Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Tennessee opinions name it 4 courts 1981–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Tennessee courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Federal Copper & Aluminum Company v. Dickeygreen1 sentence2021It cited Federal Copper and Aluminum Company v. Dickey, 493 S.W.2d 463, 464 (Tenn. 1973), where the Tennessee Supreme Court adopted the following test for willful misrepresentation: (1) The employee must have knowingly and willfully made a false representation as to his physical condition; (2) the employer must have relied upon the false representation and this reliance must have been a substantial factor in the hiring; and (3) there must have been a causal connection between the false representation and the injury. | 1 | 1 |
McDaniel v. CSX Transportation, Inc.green1 sentence2013In examining the other factors, trial “courts ‘must analyze the science and not merely the qualifications [of the expert].’” Scott, 275 S.W.3d at 402 (quoting McDaniel v. CSX Transp., Inc., 955 S.W.2d 257, 265 (Tenn. 1997)). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Littlegreen1 sentence1981Judge Scott’s analysis was as follows: In State v. Little, 560 S.W.2d 403, 407 (Tenn.1978), our Supreme Court set forth two circumstances that authorize the impeachment of a search warrant affidavit sufficient on its face. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Tennessee. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Jordan v. Baptist Three Rivers Hospital
green
2 sentences2001The court granted this motion, holding that Jordan v. Baptist Three Rivers Hospital, 984 S.W.2d 593 (Tenn.1999), did not embrace a claim by a parent for the loss of consortium of a deceased child. 2000The court granted this motion, holding that Jordan v. Baptist Three Rivers Hospital, 984 S.W.2d 593 (Tenn. 1999), did not embrace a claim by a parent for the loss of consortium of a deceased child. | 2 | 2000–2001 |
State v. Scott
green
1 sentence2013In examining the other factors, trial “courts ‘must analyze the science and not merely the qualifications [of the expert].’” Scott, 275 S.W.3d at 402 (quoting McDaniel v. CSX Transp., Inc., 955 S.W.2d 257, 265 (Tenn. 1997)). | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Randall D. Kiser v. Ian J. Wolfe
green
1 sentence2013Kiser v. Wolfe, 353 S.W.3d 741 , 747 2 Although Mr. Scott’s motion was filed pursuant to Tennessee Rule of Civil Procedure 12, the trial court granted summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 because matters outside the pleadings were considered by the trial court. | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.