residual exception (Texas) · Go Syfert
← Texas issues

residual exception in Texas

6 Texas opinions name it 1 courts 2002–2023 3 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

CaseFollowedCited
Johnson v. United Statesgreen
scotus · 2015 · cited in 2 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2022–2023
2 sentences

2023It does not appear law enforcement or appellate courts have “had trouble making sense” of the statute or that the statute is “nearly impossible to apply consistently.” Cf. Johnson, 576 U.S. at 598–99 (“Here, this Court’s repeated attempts and repeated failures to craft a principled and objective standard out of the residual clause confirm its hopeless indeterminacy.”). - 20 - 04-22-00513, 514, 515, 516, 517, 518, 519-CR The trial court erred to the extent it granted the motions to quash on Appellees’ vagueness claims.

2022Id. at 597.

12
Sessions v. Dimayagreen
scotus · 2018 · cited in 1 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2021–2021
1 sentence

2021See Dimaya, 2018 U.S. LEXIS 2497, at *39 .4 Because the immigration consequences of a conviction for evading arrest in a motor vehicle are “not succinct and straightforward,” Greaves owed appellant a duty only to advise him that his conviction may carry a risk of adverse immigration consequences.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (2)

CaseCitedYears
Idaho v. Wright green
scotus · 1990
2 sentences

2002Id ., 497 U.S. at 817 , 110 S. Ct. at 3148 .

2002Id ., 497 U.S. at 817 , 110 S. Ct. at 3148 .

22002–2002
Lujan v. Navistar, Inc. green
tex · 2018
1 sentence

2019Id. at 88 .

12019–2019

Where else courts name it

CT 51 (1988–2025) IL 45 (1984–2026) GA 42 (2008–2026) MN 40 (1970–2026) MT 26 (1988–2017) NC 26 (1984–2023) IA 25 (1994–2024) CA 25 (1982–2026) WI 23 (1978–2025) MI 22 (1998–2023) MA 16 (1982–2024) MS 15 (1968–2017) CO 14 (1986–2026) OR 11 (1984–2026) AZ 11 (1974–2024) NJ 10 (1955–2024) UT 10 (2001–2025) WA 10 (1990–2025) NM 10 (1990–2024) NE 10 (1993–2023) PA 9 (2005–2025) AK 8 (1972–2021) KY 8 (1989–2021) SD 8 (1985–2016) MD 8 (1995–2020) DE 7 (1999–2023) ND 7 (2009–2025) KS 7 (1992–2021) TX 6 (2002–2023) RI 6 (1996–2011) WV 5 (1990–2025) NV 5 (1998–2019) IN 5 (2005–2019) OK 4 (1967–2005) FL 4 (1963–2024) AR 4 (1992–2021) MO 4 (2002–2019) ID 3 (1988–2023) DC 3 (2004–2020) OH 2 (2006–2017) VT 2 (2023–2024) NY 2 (1980–1995) AL 2 (1995–2001) TN 2 (2016–2019) LA 2 (1962–1990) VI 2 (2002–2015) WY 2 (2003–2015)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check