6 Wisconsin opinions name it 2 courts 1981–2013 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Wisconsin courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Wisconsin. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Wisconsin. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Huntoon v. Capozza
green
2 sentences2013Huntoon v. Capozza, 57 Wis. 2d 447, 452 , 204 N.W.2d 649 (1973). 2013Huntoon v. Capozza, 57 Wis. 2d 447, 452 , 204 N.W.2d 649 (1973). | 2 | 2013–2013 |
California v. Trombetta
green
2 sentences2010"In Trombetta , the Court focused its analysis on the defendant's right to fundamental fairness by giving the defendant a chance to present a complete defense." Id. (citing Trombetta, 467 U.S. at 485 ). ¶ 22. 2010"In Trombetta , the Court focused its analysis on the defendant's right to fundamental fairness by giving the defendant a chance to present a complete defense." Id. (citing Trombetta, 467 U.S. at 485 ). ¶ 22. | 2 | 1994–2010 |
Donaldson v. BD. OF COM'RS OF ROCK-KOSHKONONG LAKE
neutral
2 sentences2004Id. 2004Id. | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Rakas v. Illinois
green
2 sentences1981Rather than view the question as one falling within the traditional concept of “standing,” the court focused its analysis on whether “the challenged search and seizure violated the Fourth Amendment rights of a criminal defendant who seeks to exclude the evidence obtained during it.” Id. at 140 . 1981Rather than view the question as one falling within the traditional concept of "standing," the court focused its analysis on whether "the challenged search and seizure violated the Fourth Amendment rights of a criminal defendant who seeks to exclude the evidence obtained during it." Id. at 140 . | 1 | 1981–1981 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.