5 Colorado opinions name it 2 courts 1975–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Colorado courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Specialty Restaurants Corp. v. Nelsongreen1 sentence2021Corp. v. Nelson , 231 P.3d 393, 397 ( Colo. 2010 ) . ¶58 Had the legislature intended to bar the type of consecutive prison-probation sentences Manaois received in this case , it presumably would have said as much. | 1 | 1 |
Smith v. Doegreen1 sentence2018See Smith v. Doe, 538 U.S. 84, 92 (2003) (legislative intent as expressed in statute supported conclusion that Alaska sex offender registration statute was non-punitive). | 1 | 1 |
Devenyns v. Hartiggreen1 sentence2015See Devenyns, 983 P.2d at 66 . | 1 | 1 |
People v. Lagegreen1 sentence2015See People v. Lage, 232 P.3d 138 , 141 (Colo.App.2009) (when different statutes relate to the same subject matter, they are closely enough related to justify interpreting one in light of the other). ¶ 17 Reading the two statutes consistently, we conclude that the legislature intended that the exception apply to the doctor's unaltered prescription order. "[I]nformation acquired" by the doctor, in section 13-90-107(1)(d), extends beyond statements made by a patient to his or her doctor to include medical records created in the course of treatment. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Colorado. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
v. Struckmeyer
green
1 sentence2020Nothing in this discussion suggests that the legislature intended the waiver of immunity to be limited to cases of negligence, and not applicable to more serious torts such as gross negligence or intentional conduct. ¶ 72 When a person operating a jail acts with wrongful intent, the person also acts at least negligently by unreasonably neglecting the rights of the injured claimant. “[P]roving a culpable mental state 33 necessarily establishes any lesser culpable mental state(s).” People v. Struckmeyer, 2020 CO 76, ¶ 6 . ¶ 73 The majority correctly states that negligence and intentional torts a | 1 | 2020–2020 |
White v. Hansen
green
1 sentence2020Nothing in this discussion suggests that the legislature intended the waiver of immunity to be limited to cases of negligence, and not applicable to more serious torts such as gross negligence or intentional conduct. ¶ 72 When a person operating a jail acts with wrongful intent, the person also acts at least negligently by unreasonably neglecting the rights of the injured claimant. “[P]roving a culpable mental state 33 necessarily establishes any lesser culpable mental state(s).” People v. Struckmeyer, 2020 CO 76, ¶ 6 . ¶ 73 The majority correctly states that negligence and intentional torts a | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Shoenberg Farms, Inc. v. People ex rel. Swisher
green
2 sentences1975Swisher, 166 Colo. 199 , 444 P.2d 277 ; Burton v. City and County of Denver, 99 Colo. 207 , 61 P.2d 856 , we conclude that the legislature intended that the defense of factual or legal impossibility not be available in an attempt prosecution. 1975Swisher, 166 Colo. 199 , 444 P.2d 277 ; Burton v. City and County of Denver, 99 Colo. 207 , 61 P.2d 856 , we conclude that the legislature intended that the defense of factual or legal impossibility not be available in an attempt prosecution. | 1 | 1975–1975 |
Burton v. City & County of Denver
green
2 sentences1975Swisher, 166 Colo. 199 , 444 P.2d 277 ; Burton v. City and County of Denver, 99 Colo. 207 , 61 P.2d 856 , we conclude that the legislature intended that the defense of factual or legal impossibility not be available in an attempt prosecution. 1975Swisher, 166 Colo. 199 , 444 P.2d 277 ; Burton v. City and County of Denver, 99 Colo. 207 , 61 P.2d 856 , we conclude that the legislature intended that the defense of factual or legal impossibility not be available in an attempt prosecution. | 1 | 1975–1975 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.