practical rule in Florida

1992In determining that the tax met the external consistency test and was fairly apportioned, the Court observed “that the external consistency test is essentially a practical inquiry.” 488 U.S. at 264 , 109 S.Ct. at 590 , 102 L.Ed.2d at 619 .

1992In determining that the tax met the external consistency test and was fairly apportioned, the Court observed “that the external consistency test is essentially a practical inquiry.” 488 U.S. at 264 , 109 S.Ct. at 590 , 102 L.Ed.2d at 619 .

1990This case is controlled by the practical rule of Shank v. Fassoulas, 304 So.2d 469 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974), as explained in Sears Roebuck & Co. v. Jackson , that an error which is brought to the trial court's attention as soon as it is discovered may be timely, even though not contemporaneous. [1] See Routh v. Williams, 141 Fla. 334, 339 , 193 So. 71 , 73 (1940); Lamb v. State, 90 Fla. 844, 849-50 , 107 So. 530, 532 (1925); Brantley v. Tampa Gen.

1990This case is controlled by the practical rule of Shank v. Fassoulas, 304 So.2d 469 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974), as explained in Sears Roebuck & Co. v. Jackson , that an error which is brought to the trial court's attention as soon as it is discovered may be timely, even though not contemporaneous. [1] See Routh v. Williams, 141 Fla. 334, 339 , 193 So. 71 , 73 (1940); Lamb v. State, 90 Fla. 844, 849-50 , 107 So. 530, 532 (1925); Brantley v. Tampa Gen.

1990This case is controlled by the practical rule of Shank v. Fassoulas, 304 So.2d 469 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974), as explained in Sears Roebuck & Co. v. Jackson , that an error which is brought to the trial court's attention as soon as it is discovered may be timely, even though not contemporaneous. [1] See Routh v. Williams, 141 Fla. 334, 339 , 193 So. 71 , 73 (1940); Lamb v. State, 90 Fla. 844, 849-50 , 107 So. 530, 532 (1925); Brantley v. Tampa Gen.

1990Hosp., 315 So.2d 233, 234 (Fla. 2d DCA), cert. dismissed, 320 So.2d 396 (Fla. 1975). [2] The plaintiff first objected to the admission of the subject medical records in his post-trial motion for new trial, and thus raised an otherwise unpreserved error as a basis for his new trial request.

1976Although controlled by the policy therein, Loftus, supra, held that the term “automobile,” in light of applicable law, modern definitions, and the practical rule that courts will not distort the definition of words utilized in the normal course of the English language in order to impose liability upon an insurer, is not synonymous with the term “motorcycle.” Cf. Florida Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company v. Pitzer, Fla.App.4th 1976, 330 So.2d 499 .

1976Although controlled by the policy therein, Loftus, supra, held that the term “automobile,” in light of applicable law, modern definitions, and the practical rule that courts will not distort the definition of words utilized in the normal course of the English language in order to impose liability upon an insurer, is not synonymous with the term “motorcycle.” Cf. Florida Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company v. Pitzer, Fla.App.4th 1976, 330 So.2d 499 .

1975Co. of Omaha, supra , we hold the terms "automobile" and "motorcycle" are not here synonymous.

1957“The oral and written tests shall 'bé made with reference to knowledge of the Building Code; the practical test shall be evidencetyf work done iri 'class for which application is 'rnade,' and such evidence may be furnished by photographs with affidavits of such construction, and/or affidavits of competency from persons for which said ' work was done. ' “If the applicant, however,'shall-fail to make a grade of 75%. as. above provided, then, the Examining Board-shall refuse to grant'such-certificate.”. 183 So. 304, 310 .