Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Oklahoma opinions name it 3 courts 1912–1984 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Oklahoma courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Blair v. Clear Creek Oil & Gas Co.green2 sentences1984The Arkansas Supreme Court held in the case of Blair v. Clear Creek Oil & Gas Co., 148 Ark. 301 , 230 S.W. 286 , 19 A.L.R. 430, 434 (1921): “The practical test is to be found in the question: Are the outside wells, as, for example, the wells on the Greig and Bryant tracts, draining the Blair land to such an extent that, if the wells on the Greig and Bryant tracts were operated by a third party, appellee, as lessee of the Blair tract, would find it good management to put down protection wells to save its own leased territory from exhaustion? 1984The Arkansas Supreme Court held in the case of Blair v. Clear Creek Oil & Gas Co., 148 Ark. 301 , 230 S.W. 286 , 19 A.L.R. 430, 434 (1921): “The practical test is to be found in the question: Are the outside wells, as, for example, the wells on the Greig and Bryant tracts, draining the Blair land to such an extent that, if the wells on the Greig and Bryant tracts were operated by a third party, appellee, as lessee of the Blair tract, would find it good management to put down protection wells to save its own leased territory from exhaustion? | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Oklahoma. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Anderson v. State
green
2 sentences1920In Anderson v. State, 8 Okla. 1919In Anderson v. State, 8 Okla. | 2 | 1919–1920 |
Stanley v. Sweet
green
2 sentences1974Stanley v. Sweet, 202 Okl. 448 , 214 P.2d 906 (1950). 1974Stanley v. Sweet, 202 Okl. 448 , 214 P.2d 906 (1950). | 1 | 1974–1974 |
State v. Douglas
green
2 sentences1961In the case of State v. Douglas, 70 S.D. 203 -, 16 N.W.2d 489, 502 , the Supreme Court said: “The crime charged is, in effect, an embezzlement of the funds of the State. 1961In the case of State v. Douglas, 70 S.D. 203 -, 16 N.W.2d 489, 502 , the Supreme Court said: “The crime charged is, in effect, an embezzlement of the funds of the State. | 1 | 1961–1961 |
State v. Moran
green
2 sentences1947In the case of State v. Moran, 15 Or. 262 , 14 P. 419, 420 , it is held: *271 “On trial for murder the confessions of the defendant, made by him, as an admitted accomplice, when another person was on trial for the same crime, are admissible in evidence, when they have been made under an agreement with the district attorney that, if he would testify fully all he knew concerning the murder, he should not be prosecuted for any complicity therein, and subsequently he escaped from custody, and failed to perform his part of said agreement.” In the body of the opinion the Supreme Court of Oregon stat 1947In the case of State v. Moran, 15 Or. 262 , 14 P. 419, 420 , it is held: *271 “On trial for murder the confessions of the defendant, made by him, as an admitted accomplice, when another person was on trial for the same crime, are admissible in evidence, when they have been made under an agreement with the district attorney that, if he would testify fully all he knew concerning the murder, he should not be prosecuted for any complicity therein, and subsequently he escaped from custody, and failed to perform his part of said agreement.” In the body of the opinion the Supreme Court of Oregon stat | 1 | 1947–1947 |
State v. Thaden
green
2 sentences1912If it will form one link in the chain of testimony against him, he is not bound to answer; and the court should so instruct him as to -enable him to decide understandingly.” In 1890, Mr. Justice Mitchell, in the case of State v. Thaden, 43 Minn. 253 , 45 N. W. 447 , said: “After consideration of the question and an examination of the authorities, our conclusion is that the best practical rule is that laid down in some of the English cases and adopted and followed by Chief Justice. 1912If it will form one link in the chain of testimony against him, he is not bound to answer; and the court should so instruct him as to -enable him to decide understandingly.” In 1890, Mr. Justice Mitchell, in the case of State v. Thaden, 43 Minn. 253 , 45 N. W. 447 , said: “After consideration of the question and an examination of the authorities, our conclusion is that the best practical rule is that laid down in some of the English cases and adopted and followed by Chief Justice. | 1 | 1912–1912 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.