5 Idaho opinions name it 1 courts 1978–2009 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Idaho courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Thorn Creek Cattle Ass'n, Inc. v. Bonzgreen2 sentences1999Thorn Creek Cattle Ass’n, Inc., v. Bonz, 122 Idaho 42, 45 , 830 P.2d 1180, 1183 (1992) (citing Toney v. Coeur d’Alene Sch. 1999Thorn Creek Cattle Ass’n, Inc., v. Bonz, 122 Idaho 42, 45 , 830 P.2d 1180, 1183 (1992) (citing Toney v. Coeur d’Alene Sch. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Idaho. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Psychiatric Healthcare Corp. v. Department of Social Services
green
2 sentences2009In Psychiatric Healthcare Corp., the state of Missouri adopted an administrative regulation requiring that hospitals include a certificate of need form in a patient’s medical record, which complied with the certification requirement in 42 C.F.R. § 441.152 , or the hospital would forfeit all payment for medically necessary care. 100 S.W.3d at 904 . 2009In Psychiatric Healthcare Corp., the state of Missouri adopted an administrative regulation requiring that hospitals include a certificate of need form in a patient‟s medical record, which complied with the certification requirement in 42 C.F.R. § 441.152 , or the hospital would forfeit all payment for medically necessary care. 100 S.W.3d at 904 . | 3 | 2009–2009 |
Matter of JS
green
1 sentence1978Matter of J.S., 556 P.2d 641 , 643 (Okl.Cr. 1976). | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.