Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
14 Nevada opinions name it 2 courts 1969–2024 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Nevada courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Wright v. State, Department of Motor Vehiclesgreen2 sentences2016See Wright, 121 Nev. at 125, 110 P.3d at 1068. 2016See Wright, 121 Nev. at 125, 110 P.3d at 1068. | 4 | 4 |
Miller v. Alabamagreen2 sentences2017See Miller v. Alabama, 567 U.S. 460, 479 (2012) (mandatory sentences of life without the possibility of parole for juvenile SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 4 (0) I947A AZe offenders convicted of homicide violates the Eighth Amendment). 2017See Miller v. Alabama, 567 U.S. „ 132 S. Ct. 2455, 2469 (2012) (mandatory sentences of life without the possibility of parole for juvenile offenders convicted of homicide violates the Eighth Amendment). | 3 | 3 |
Missouri v. Fryegreen1 sentence2024See Frye, 566 U.S. at 143 (explaining that the adult criminal justice system for the niost part a system of pleas, not a system of trials") (quoting Lafler v. Cooper, 566 U.S. 156, 170 (2012)). | 1 | 1 |
Lafler v. Coopergreen1 sentence2024See Frye, 566 U.S. at 143 (explaining that the adult criminal justice system for the niost part a system of pleas, not a system of trials") (quoting Lafler v. Cooper, 566 U.S. 156, 170 (2012)). | 1 | 1 |
Anthony Lee R., a Minor v. Stategreen2 sentences2024See Anthony Lee R. v. State, 113 Nev. 1406 , 1410 n.1, 952 P.2d 1 , 4 n.1 (1997) ("The juvenile court's decision to retain jurisdiction or certify for criminal proceedings is a much more momentous and life-changing event for a juvenile than is an adjudication of delinquency . . . ."). 2024See Anthony Lee R. v. State, 113 Nev. 1406 , 1410 n.1, 952 P.2d 1 , 4 n.1 (1997) ("The juvenile court's decision to retain jurisdiction or certify for criminal proceedings is a much more momentous and life-changing event for a juvenile than is an adjudication of delinquency . . . ."). | 1 | 1 |
Matter of Two Minor Childrengreen2 sentences2024In re Two Minor Children, 95 Nev. 225, 231 , 592 P.2d 166, 169 (1979) (holding that if a minor was not competent, the court "could go no further with the proceedings"); see NRS 62D.190. 2024If D.C. was incompetent, the court "could go no further with the proceedings." In re Two Minor Children, 95 Nev. at 231 , 592 P.2d at 169 . | 1 | 1 |
........................ v. Stategreen2 sentences2022A Minor v. State, 86 Nev. 691, 694 , 476 P.2d 11, 13 (1970). 2022A Minor v. State, 86 Nev. 691, 694 , 476 P.2d 11, 13 (1970). | 1 | 1 |
MacK-manley v. Manleygreen2 sentences2018See Manley, 122 Nev. at 855 , 138 P.3d at 529-30 . 2018See Manley, 122 Nev. at 855 , 138 P.3d at 529-30 . | 1 | 1 |
Thedford v. Sheriff, Clark Countygreen2 sentences1990Cf. Three Minors, 100 Nev. at 418 , 684 P.2d at 1124 , with Thedford v. Sheriff, 86 Nev. 741, 743-744 , 476 P.2d 25, 27 (1970). 1990Cf. Three Minors, 100 Nev. at 418 , 684 P.2d at 1124 , with Thedford v. Sheriff, 86 Nev. 741, 743-744 , 476 P.2d 25, 27 (1970). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Nevada. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Kent v. United States
green
2 sentences2017Relying on Kent v. United States, 383 U.S. 541 (1966), appellant asserts that the juvenile court's order does not demonstrate that a full investigation was performed prior to the certification hearing. 2017Relying on Kent v. United States, 383 U.S. 541 (1966), appellant asserts that the juvenile court's order does not demonstrate that a full investigation was performed prior to the certification hearing. | 4 | 1997–2017 |
Dickson v. Second Judicial District Court
green
2 sentences2024In re Two Minor Children, 95 Nev. 225, 231 , 592 P.2d 166, 169 (1979) (holding that if a minor was not competent, the court "could go no further with the proceedings"); see NRS 62D.190. 2024If D.C. was incompetent, the court "could go no further with the proceedings." In re Two Minor Children, 95 Nev. at 231 , 592 P.2d at 169 . | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Thomas R. v. Juvenile Division
green
2 sentences2024At the certification hearing, the juvenile court considered the factors established for discretionary certification in In re Seven Minors, 99 Nev. 427 , 664 P.2d 947 (1983), disapproved on other grounds by In re 5 William S., 122 Nev. 432 , 442 n.23, 132 P.3d 1015 , 1021 n.23 (2006). 2024At the certification hearing, the juvenile court considered the factors established for discretionary certification in In re Seven Minors, 99 Nev. 427 , 664 P.2d 947 (1983), disapproved on other grounds by In re 5 William S., 122 Nev. 432 , 442 n.23, 132 P.3d 1015 , 1021 n.23 (2006). | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Matter of Seven Minors
green
2 sentences2024At the certification hearing, the juvenile court considered the factors established for discretionary certification in In re Seven Minors, 99 Nev. 427 , 664 P.2d 947 (1983), disapproved on other grounds by In re 5 William S., 122 Nev. 432 , 442 n.23, 132 P.3d 1015 , 1021 n.23 (2006). 2024At the certification hearing, the juvenile court considered the factors established for discretionary certification in In re Seven Minors, 99 Nev. 427 , 664 P.2d 947 (1983), disapproved on other grounds by In re 5 William S., 122 Nev. 432 , 442 n.23, 132 P.3d 1015 , 1021 n.23 (2006). | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Matter of William S.
green
2 sentences2024At the certification hearing, the juvenile court considered the factors established for discretionary certification in In re Seven Minors, 99 Nev. 427 , 664 P.2d 947 (1983), disapproved on other grounds by In re 5 William S., 122 Nev. 432 , 442 n.23, 132 P.3d 1015 , 1021 n.23 (2006). 2024At the certification hearing, the juvenile court considered the factors established for discretionary certification in In re Seven Minors, 99 Nev. 427 , 664 P.2d 947 (1983), disapproved on other grounds by In re 5 William S., 122 Nev. 432 , 442 n.23, 132 P.3d 1015 , 1021 n.23 (2006). | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Rickell W. v. State
green
1 sentence1990Cf. Three Minors, 100 Nev. at 418 , 684 P.2d at 1124 , with Thedford v. Sheriff, 86 Nev. 741, 743-744 , 476 P.2d 25, 27 (1970). | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Matter of Three Minors
green
1 sentence1990Cf. Three Minors, 100 Nev. at 418 , 684 P.2d at 1124 , with Thedford v. Sheriff, 86 Nev. 741, 743-744 , 476 P.2d 25, 27 (1970). | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Lewis v. State
green
2 sentences1983Springer, Mowbray, Steffen, and Gunderson, JJ., concur. 1 This court upheld, in Lewis v. State, 86 Nev. 889 , 478 P.2d 168 (1970), the constitutionality of NRS 62.080 against charges that the statute constituted an unlawful delegation of legislative power by applying the standards enunciated in Kent . 2 Incidentally, Mr. Carmen’s proposed language for the amendment of NRS 62.080 was rejected. 1983Springer, Mowbray, Steffen, and Gunderson, JJ., concur. 1 This court upheld, in Lewis v. State, 86 Nev. 889 , 478 P.2d 168 (1970), the constitutionality of NRS 62.080 against charges that the statute constituted an unlawful delegation of legislative power by applying the standards enunciated in Kent . 2 Incidentally, Mr. Carmen’s proposed language for the amendment of NRS 62.080 was rejected. | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Cradle v. Peyton
green
1 sentence1969Since there was no finding of guilt in the juvenile court, but only a certification, the fact that the appellant was not represented by counsel at the certification hearing did not affect the reliability of the guilt determining process as it did in Gideon v. Wainwright, supra; Hamilton v. Alabama, supra; and Douglas v. California, supra. In Cradle v. Peyton, 156 S.E.2d 874 (Va. 1967), the Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia, in an excellent in depth analysis of the question of retrospective versus prospective application of Gault said: “In view of the justifiable reliance on the old system b | 1 | 1969–1969 |
Messmore v. Fogliani
green
2 sentences1969In Messmore v. Fogliani, 82 Nev. 153 , 413 P.2d 306 (1966), this court said: “The federal constitution neither *688 requires nor prohibits retrospective effect. 1969In Messmore v. Fogliani, 82 Nev. 153 , 413 P.2d 306 (1966), this court said: “The federal constitution neither *688 requires nor prohibits retrospective effect. | 1 | 1969–1969 |
Hamilton v. Alabama
green
1 sentence1969Since there was no finding of guilt in the juvenile court, but only a certification, the fact that the appellant was not represented by counsel at the certification hearing did not affect the reliability of the guilt determining process as it did in Gideon v. Wainwright, supra; Hamilton v. Alabama, supra; and Douglas v. California, supra. In Cradle v. Peyton, 156 S.E.2d 874 (Va. 1967), the Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia, in an excellent in depth analysis of the question of retrospective versus prospective application of Gault said: “In view of the justifiable reliance on the old system b | 1 | 1969–1969 |
Douglas v. California
green
1 sentence1969Since there was no finding of guilt in the juvenile court, but only a certification, the fact that the appellant was not represented by counsel at the certification hearing did not affect the reliability of the guilt determining process as it did in Gideon v. Wainwright, supra; Hamilton v. Alabama, supra; and Douglas v. California, supra. In Cradle v. Peyton, 156 S.E.2d 874 (Va. 1967), the Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia, in an excellent in depth analysis of the question of retrospective versus prospective application of Gault said: “In view of the justifiable reliance on the old system b | 1 | 1969–1969 |
Gideon v. Wainwright
green
1 sentence1969Since there was no finding of guilt in the juvenile court, but only a certification, the fact that the appellant was not represented by counsel at the certification hearing did not affect the reliability of the guilt determining process as it did in Gideon v. Wainwright, supra; Hamilton v. Alabama, supra; and Douglas v. California, supra. In Cradle v. Peyton, 156 S.E.2d 874 (Va. 1967), the Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia, in an excellent in depth analysis of the question of retrospective versus prospective application of Gault said: “In view of the justifiable reliance on the old system b | 1 | 1969–1969 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.