5 Idaho opinions name it 2 courts 1993–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Idaho courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Andersongreen2 sentences2019In State v. Anderson, 129 Idaho 763, 765 , 932 P.2d 886, 888 (1997), the Idaho Supreme Court relaxed the writing requirement of I.C.R. 11(a)(2) after Anderson’s counsel stated, on the record, that Anderson’s plea was conditional and he was reserving his right to appeal the district court’s ruling on the admissibility of certain evidence. 2019In State v. Anderson, 129 Idaho 763, 765 , 932 P.2d 886, 888 (1997), the Idaho Supreme Court relaxed the writing requirement of I.C.R. 11(a)(2) after Anderson’s counsel stated, on the record, that Anderson’s plea was conditional and he was reserving his right to appeal the district court’s ruling on the admissibility of certain evidence. | 1 | 1 |
Paloukos v. Intermountain Chevrolet Co.green2 sentences1993Paloukos v. Intermountain Chevrolet Co., 99 Idaho 740, 745 , 588 P.2d 939, 944 (1978), citing § 28-2-201(3)(c). 1993Paloukos v. Intermountain Chevrolet Co., 99 Idaho 740, 745 , 588 P.2d 939, 944 (1978), citing § 28-2-201(3)(c). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Robison v. Frasierred2 sentences2009In other words, the descrip *849 tion had to “meet the essentials in an action for specific performance” and be “complete within itself.” Id.; Laker Land & Loans v. Nye, 40 Idaho 793, 796 , 237 P. 630, 631 (1925), overruled by Central Idaho Agency, Inc. v. Turner, 92 Idaho 306 , 442 P.2d 442 (1968); Robison v. Frasier, 89 Idaho 326, 332-33 , 404 P.2d 877, 880-81 (1965), abrogated by Central Idaho Agency, Inc. v. Turner, 92 Idaho 306 , 442 P.2d 442 (1968). 2009In other words, the descrip *849 tion had to “meet the essentials in an action for specific performance” and be “complete within itself.” Id.; Laker Land & Loans v. Nye, 40 Idaho 793, 796 , 237 P. 630, 631 (1925), overruled by Central Idaho Agency, Inc. v. Turner, 92 Idaho 306 , 442 P.2d 442 (1968); Robison v. Frasier, 89 Idaho 326, 332-33 , 404 P.2d 877, 880-81 (1965), abrogated by Central Idaho Agency, Inc. v. Turner, 92 Idaho 306 , 442 P.2d 442 (1968). | 1 | 1 |
Laker Land & Loans v. Nyered2 sentences2009In other words, the descrip *849 tion had to “meet the essentials in an action for specific performance” and be “complete within itself.” Id.; Laker Land & Loans v. Nye, 40 Idaho 793, 796 , 237 P. 630, 631 (1925), overruled by Central Idaho Agency, Inc. v. Turner, 92 Idaho 306 , 442 P.2d 442 (1968); Robison v. Frasier, 89 Idaho 326, 332-33 , 404 P.2d 877, 880-81 (1965), abrogated by Central Idaho Agency, Inc. v. Turner, 92 Idaho 306 , 442 P.2d 442 (1968). 2009In other words, the descrip *849 tion had to “meet the essentials in an action for specific performance” and be “complete within itself.” Id.; Laker Land & Loans v. Nye, 40 Idaho 793, 796 , 237 P. 630, 631 (1925), overruled by Central Idaho Agency, Inc. v. Turner, 92 Idaho 306 , 442 P.2d 442 (1968); Robison v. Frasier, 89 Idaho 326, 332-33 , 404 P.2d 877, 880-81 (1965), abrogated by Central Idaho Agency, Inc. v. Turner, 92 Idaho 306 , 442 P.2d 442 (1968). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Lettunich v. Key Bank National Ass'n
green
2 sentences2013Id. at 367, 109 P.3d at 6 1109. 2013Id. at 367, 109 P.3d at 1109 . | 2 | 2013–2013 |
Murphy v. Livesay
green
2 sentences2009In this Court’s earlier decisions, we held that to satisfy the writing requirement contained in section 9-508, a commission agreement had to include a property description “no less certain in its terms than would be required under any other phase of the statute of frauds.” Murphy, 34 Idaho at 796 , 197 P. at 536 . 2009In this Court’s earlier decisions, we held that to satisfy the writing requirement contained in section 9-508, a commission agreement had to include a property description “no less certain in its terms than would be required under any other phase of the statute of frauds.” Murphy, 34 Idaho at 796 , 197 P. at 536 . | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Central Idaho Agency, Inc. v. Turner
green
2 sentences2009In other words, the descrip *849 tion had to “meet the essentials in an action for specific performance” and be “complete within itself.” Id.; Laker Land & Loans v. Nye, 40 Idaho 793, 796 , 237 P. 630, 631 (1925), overruled by Central Idaho Agency, Inc. v. Turner, 92 Idaho 306 , 442 P.2d 442 (1968); Robison v. Frasier, 89 Idaho 326, 332-33 , 404 P.2d 877, 880-81 (1965), abrogated by Central Idaho Agency, Inc. v. Turner, 92 Idaho 306 , 442 P.2d 442 (1968). 2009In other words, the descrip *849 tion had to “meet the essentials in an action for specific performance” and be “complete within itself.” Id.; Laker Land & Loans v. Nye, 40 Idaho 793, 796 , 237 P. 630, 631 (1925), overruled by Central Idaho Agency, Inc. v. Turner, 92 Idaho 306 , 442 P.2d 442 (1968); Robison v. Frasier, 89 Idaho 326, 332-33 , 404 P.2d 877, 880-81 (1965), abrogated by Central Idaho Agency, Inc. v. Turner, 92 Idaho 306 , 442 P.2d 442 (1968). | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.