Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 Connecticut opinions name it 3 courts 1994–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Connecticut courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Bennett v. Meadergreen2 sentences2010Bennett v. Meader, 208 Conn. 352, 362 , 545 A.2d 553 (1988); see also id., 362 n.8 (“only *761 written arbitration agreements are enforceable and all others are void”). 1994In Bennett v. Meader , 208 Conn. 352 , 359 (1988) the court held that "an agreement to arbitrate must meet the requirements of the arbitration statute, including that the agreement be in writing, or it is invalid." The courts have followed this strict enforcement of the writing requirement in order to eliminate the problems of proving an oral agreement and in order to establish, either separately or within the agreement to arbitrate, a written submission setting forth the arbitrable issues. | 1 | 2 |
United States v. Jonathan Garrett and Christopher Garrettgreen1 sentence2008See, e.g., United States v. Robertson, supra, 1431 ; United States v. Saadya, 750 F.2d 1419, 1420 (9th Cir. 1985); United States v. Garrett, 727 F.2d 1003, 1012-13 (11th Cir. 1984), aff'd, 471 U.S. 773 , 105 S. Ct. 2407 , 85 L. | 1 | 1 |
United States v. Amnon Saadya, United States of America v. Marco Abkasisgreen1 sentence2008See, e.g., United States v. Robertson, supra, 1431 ; United States v. Saadya, 750 F.2d 1419, 1420 (9th Cir. 1985); United States v. Garrett, 727 F.2d 1003, 1012-13 (11th Cir. 1984), aff'd, 471 U.S. 773 , 105 S. Ct. 2407 , 85 L. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Glazer v. Dress Barn, Inc.
green
2 sentences2019Even if we were to agree that that section of the UCC was applicable to the sale of real estate, however, both defendants argue that the plaintiff in the present case failed to allege that Giardi used "explicit terms" to put the property up without reserve, under either § 42a-2-328 or § 2-328 of the UCC. 4 Although not averred in the complaint or in the amended complaint, the plaintiff argued in its opposition to Hartford Auto Park's motion to strike that, by requesting highest and best offers, Giardi offered to sell the property to the highest bidder, transforming the plaintiff's offer into a 2019Even if we were to agree that that section of the UCC was applicable to the sale of real estate, however, both defendants argue that the plaintiff in the present case failed to allege that Giardi used "explicit terms" to put the property up without reserve, under either § 42a-2-328 or § 2-328 of the UCC. 4 Although not averred in the complaint or in the amended complaint, the plaintiff argued in its opposition to Hartford Auto Park's motion to strike that, by requesting highest and best offers, Giardi offered to sell the property to the highest bidder, transforming the plaintiff's offer into a | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Pyles v. Goller
green
1 sentence2019Notwithstanding that challenge, we observe that the plaintiff had an opportunity to expand the factual record through amending its complaint. 7 We observe that, in one of the cases cited by the plaintiff in its opposition to Hartford Auto Park's motion to strike, Pyles v. Goller , 109 Md. | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Garrett v. United States
green
2 sentences2008See, e.g., United States v. Robertson, supra, 1431 ; United States v. Saadya, 750 F.2d 1419, 1420 (9th Cir. 1985); United States v. Garrett, 727 F.2d 1003, 1012-13 (11th Cir. 1984), aff'd, 471 U.S. 773 , 105 S. Ct. 2407 , 85 L. 2008See, e.g., United States v. Robertson, supra, 1431 ; United States v. Saadya, 750 F.2d 1419, 1420 (9th Cir. 1985); United States v. Garrett, 727 F.2d 1003, 1012-13 (11th Cir. 1984), aff'd, 471 U.S. 773 , 105 S. Ct. 2407 , 85 L. | 1 | 2008–2008 |
Marrin v. Spearow
green
2 sentences2002“The methods of discontinuing a highway through governmental agencies are pre scribed by law and must be strictly followed.” Marrin v. Spearow, 35 Conn. App. 398, 404 , 646 A.2d 254 (1994). 2002“The methods of discontinuing a highway through governmental agencies are pre scribed by law and must be strictly followed.” Marrin v. Spearow, 35 Conn. App. 398, 404 , 646 A.2d 254 (1994). | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Cole
green
2 sentences2002B The plaintiff also claims that the court, citing Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Cole, 189 Conn. 518, 532 , 457 A.2d 656 (1983) (letterhead or billhead satisfies signature requirement), improperly found that form 1099-C satisfied the writing requirement of § 42a-3-604 (a) (ii). 2002B The plaintiff also claims that the court, citing Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Cole, 189 Conn. 518, 532 , 457 A.2d 656 (1983) (letterhead or billhead satisfies signature requirement), improperly found that form 1099-C satisfied the writing requirement of § 42a-3-604 (a) (ii). | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Sawmill Brook Racing Ass'n v. Boston Realty Advisors, Inc.
green
2 sentences1997The cases cited by the plaintiffs, Schwarzschild v. Martin, 191 Conn. 316 , 464 A.2d 774 (1983), and Sawmill Brook Racing Assn., Inc. v. Boston Realty Advisors, Inc., 39 Conn. App. 444 , 664 A.2d 819 (1995), are inapposite cases discussing the writing requirement of General Statutes § 52-408 for a contract authorizing arbitration. 1997The cases cited by the plaintiffs, Schwarzschild v. Martin, 191 Conn. 316 , 464 A.2d 774 (1983), and Sawmill Brook Racing Assn., Inc. v. Boston Realty Advisors, Inc., 39 Conn. App. 444 , 664 A.2d 819 (1995), are inapposite cases discussing the writing requirement of General Statutes § 52-408 for a contract authorizing arbitration. | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Schwarzschild v. Martin
green
2 sentences1997The cases cited by the plaintiffs, Schwarzschild v. Martin, 191 Conn. 316 , 464 A.2d 774 (1983), and Sawmill Brook Racing Assn., Inc. v. Boston Realty Advisors, Inc., 39 Conn. App. 444 , 664 A.2d 819 (1995), are inapposite cases discussing the writing requirement of General Statutes § 52-408 for a contract authorizing arbitration. 1997The cases cited by the plaintiffs, Schwarzschild v. Martin, 191 Conn. 316 , 464 A.2d 774 (1983), and Sawmill Brook Racing Assn., Inc. v. Boston Realty Advisors, Inc., 39 Conn. App. 444 , 664 A.2d 819 (1995), are inapposite cases discussing the writing requirement of General Statutes § 52-408 for a contract authorizing arbitration. | 1 | 1997–1997 |
General Accident Insurance Co. of America v. Powers, Bolles, Houlihan & Hartline, Inc.
neutral
1 sentence1996The plaintiff appealed the trial court's judgment raising the issue that the trial court improperly refused to instruct the jury as to the writing requirement. 1 General Accident Insurance Company of America v. Powers, Bolles, Houlihan, and Hartline, Inc., 38 Conn. App. 290 (1995). | 1 | 1996–1996 |
Adam v. Consolini
green
2 sentences1994Adam v. Consolini, 135 Conn. 321, 324 , 64 A.2d 44 (1949); Johnson v. Mary Oliver Candy Shops, Inc., supra; Perrotti v. Chiodo, 21 Conn. App. 288, 290 , 573 A.2d 342 (1990). 1994Adam v. Consolini, 135 Conn. 321, 324 , 64 A.2d 44 (1949); Johnson v. Mary Oliver Candy Shops, Inc., supra; Perrotti v. Chiodo, 21 Conn. App. 288, 290 , 573 A.2d 342 (1990). | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Perrotti v. Chiodo
green
2 sentences1994Adam v. Consolini, 135 Conn. 321, 324 , 64 A.2d 44 (1949); Johnson v. Mary Oliver Candy Shops, Inc., supra; Perrotti v. Chiodo, 21 Conn. App. 288, 290 , 573 A.2d 342 (1990). 1994Adam v. Consolini, 135 Conn. 321, 324 , 64 A.2d 44 (1949); Johnson v. Mary Oliver Candy Shops, Inc., supra; Perrotti v. Chiodo, 21 Conn. App. 288, 290 , 573 A.2d 342 (1990). | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.