mere personal privilege (Illinois) · Go Syfert
← Illinois issues

mere personal privilege in Illinois

5 Illinois opinions name it 2 courts 1971–2003 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
Holladay v. Chicago Arc Light & Power Co.green
illappct · 1894 · cited in 2 Illinois opinions naming this issue, 1991–2003
2 sentences

2003App. 3d 996, 1001 , 387 N.E.2d 866 (1979), quoting Holladay v. Chicago Arc Light & Power Co., 55 Ill.

1991App. 3d at 1001 , quoting Holladay v. Chicago Arc Light & Power Co. (1894), 55 Ill.

12

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (6)

CaseCitedYears
In Re Application of Rosewell green
illappct · 1979
2 sentences

2003A license is "an authority to do some act on the land of another, without passing an estate in the land, and 'being a mere personal privilege, it can only be enjoyed by the licensee himself, and is not therefore assignable so that an under tenant can claim privileges conceded to a lessee.' " In re Application of Rosewell , 69 Ill.

2003A license is “ ‘an authority to do some act on the land of an other, without passing an estate in the land, and “being a mere personal privilege, it can only be enjoyed by the licensee himself, and is not therefore assignable so that an under tenant can claim privileges conceded to a lessee.” [Citation.]’ ” In re Application of Rosewell, 69 Ill.

31991–2003
Northern Trust Co. v. Winston green
illappct · 1975
2 sentences

1976A recent Illinois case, Northern Trust Co. v. Winston (1st Dist. 1975), 32 Ill.App.3d 199 , 336 N.E.2d 543 , involved a somewhat similar trust provision giving the widow occupancy of a condominium residence.

1976A recent Illinois case, Northern Trust Co. v. Winston (1st Dist. 1975), 32 Ill.App.3d 199 , 336 N.E.2d 543 , involved a somewhat similar trust provision giving the widow occupancy of a condominium residence.

11976–1976
Winters National Bank & Trust Co. v. Shawen green
ohprobctmontgom · 1964
1 sentence

1976In Chamberland v. Goldberg (1959), 89 RI. 223, 152 A.2d 219 , the court found a life estate; however, a mere personal privilege of occupancy was found in Baldesberger v. Baldesberger (1954), 378 Pa. 113 , 105 A.2d 713 , 45 A.L.R. 2d 691 , and in Winters National Bank & Trust Co. v. Shawen (Ohio Prob. 1964), 205 N.E.2d 135 .

11976–1976
Baldesberger v. Baldesberger green
pa · 1954
2 sentences

1976In Chamberland v. Goldberg (1959), 89 RI. 223, 152 A.2d 219 , the court found a life estate; however, a mere personal privilege of occupancy was found in Baldesberger v. Baldesberger (1954), 378 Pa. 113 , 105 A.2d 713 , 45 A.L.R. 2d 691 , and in Winters National Bank & Trust Co. v. Shawen (Ohio Prob. 1964), 205 N.E.2d 135 .

1976In Chamberland v. Goldberg (1959), 89 RI. 223, 152 A.2d 219 , the court found a life estate; however, a mere personal privilege of occupancy was found in Baldesberger v. Baldesberger (1954), 378 Pa. 113 , 105 A.2d 713 , 45 A.L.R. 2d 691 , and in Winters National Bank & Trust Co. v. Shawen (Ohio Prob. 1964), 205 N.E.2d 135 .

11976–1976
Chamberland v. Goldberg green
ri · 1959
1 sentence

1976In Chamberland v. Goldberg (1959), 89 RI. 223, 152 A.2d 219 , the court found a life estate; however, a mere personal privilege of occupancy was found in Baldesberger v. Baldesberger (1954), 378 Pa. 113 , 105 A.2d 713 , 45 A.L.R. 2d 691 , and in Winters National Bank & Trust Co. v. Shawen (Ohio Prob. 1964), 205 N.E.2d 135 .

11976–1976
Gustin v. Barney green
illappct · 1928
1 sentence

1971Barney, 250 Ill.

11971–1971

Where else courts name it

AL 26 (1877–2017) MO 17 (1832–2016) SC 16 (1908–2024) TX 11 (1885–2017) PA 11 (1932–2025) NE 9 (1876–2015) NY 9 (1859–2000) CA 7 (1924–2020) IL 5 (1971–2003) CO 5 (1911–2003) MA 4 (1838–1993) FL 3 (1960–2004) IA 3 (1886–1937) NJ 3 (1882–2015) MD 3 (1984–2017) AR 3 (1873–1944) NC 3 (1953–1961) WY 2 (1957–1985) KS 2 (1907–1916) UT 2 (1903–1906) MI 2 (1927–2014) KY 2 (1884–1937) WA 2 (1913–1942) OR 2 (1943–1972) NM 2 (1920–1936) GA 2 (1905–1949)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check