21 C.F.R. § 1308.01
Scope of this part
Schedules of controlled substances established by section 202 of the Act (21 U.S.C. 812) and nonnarcotic substances, chemical preparations, veterinary anabolic steroid implant products, prescription products, anabolic steroid products, and cannabis plant material and products made therefrom that contain tetrahydrocannabinols excluded pursuant to section 201 of the Act (21 U.S.C. 811), as they are changed, updated, and republished from time to time, are set forth in this part.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2000–2021 · leading case: Coronado v. Holder, 759 F.3d 977 (9th Cir. 2014).
Coronado v. Holder, 759 F.3d 977 (9th Cir. 2014). “§ 812 and revised annually in 21 C.F.R. § 1308.01 et seq. See 21 U.S.C.”
Shariff David Bula Lopez v. U.S. Attorney Gen., 914 F.3d 1292 (11th Cir. 2019). “1; see also 21 C.F.R. § 1308.01 ("Schedules of controlled substances as established by section 202 of the [CSA] ( 21 U.”
United States v. Daahir Caseer, 399 F.3d 828 (6th Cir. 2005). “§ 811 (providing in part that “(a) The Attorney General shall apply the provisions of this subchapter to the controlled substances listed in the schedules established by section 812 of this title and to any other drug or other substance added to such schedules under this…”
Raul Quijada Coronado v. Eric Holder, Jr., 747 F.3d 662 (9th Cir. 2014). “§ 812 and revised annually in 21 C.F.R. § 1308.01 et seq. See 21 U.S.C.”
United States v. Lowe, 143 F. Supp. 2d 613 (S.D.W. Va 2000). “21 C.F.R. § 1308.01 (describing the scope of part 1308).”
United States v. Estrada-Soto, 113 F. App'x 223 (9th Cir. 2004). “Estrada-Soto’s argument that his statute of conviction criminalizes conduct involving substances that are not on the list of federally prohibited substances such as tilidine fails, because tilidine is a Schedule I controlled substance.”
Shariff David Bula Lopez v. U.S. Attorney Gen., 909 F.3d 388 (11th Cir. 2018). “1; see also 21 C.F.R. § 1308.01 ("Schedules of controlled substances as established by section 202 of the [CSA] (21 U.”
Armstrong v. United States (W.D.N.C. 2021). “21 C.F.R. § 1308.01 et seq.; 81 F.R. 79389 (2016); 83 F.”
Raul Quijada Coronado v. Eric Holder, Jr. (9th Cir. 2014). “§ 812 and revised annually in 21 C.F.R. § 1308.01 et seq. See 21 U.S.C.”
United States v. Caseer (6th Cir. 2005). “§ 812 , sets forth five schedules of controlled substances which are revised annually by rules promulgated by the Administrator of the DEA and published in 21 C.F.R. § 1308.01 et seq. See 21 U.S.C.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.