§703-308 Use of force to prevent suicide or
the commission of a crime. (1) The use of force upon or toward the person
of another is justifiable when the actor believes that such force is
immediately necessary to prevent the other person from committing suicide,
inflicting serious bodily harm upon oneself, committing or consummating the
commission of a crime involving or threatening bodily injury, damage to or loss
of property, or breach of the peace, except that:
(a) Any limitations imposed by the other provisions
of this chapter on the justifiable use of force in self-protection, for the
protection of others, the protection of property, the effectuation of an
arrest, or the prevention of an escape from custody shall apply notwithstanding
the criminality of the conduct against which such force is used; and
(b) The use of deadly force is not in any event
justifiable under this section unless:
(i) The actor believes that there is a
substantial risk that the person whom the actor seeks to prevent from
committing a crime will cause death or serious bodily injury to another unless
the commission or the consummation of the crime is prevented and that the use
of such force presents no substantial risk of injury to innocent persons; or
(ii) The actor believes that the use of such
force is necessary to suppress a riot after the rioters have been ordered to
disperse and warned, in any particular manner that the law may require, that
deadly force will be used if they do not obey.
(2) The justification afforded by this section
extends to the use of confinement as preventive force only if the actor takes
all reasonable measures to terminate the confinement as soon as the actor knows
that the actor safely can, unless the person confined has been arrested on a
charge of crime. [L 1972, c 9, pt of §1; gen ch 1993]
COMMENTARY ON §703-308
The purpose of this section is to provide a justification for
the use of force to prevent suicide, serious bodily injury, or the commission
of a crime. It gives a right to use such force as the actor believes is
immediately necessary to prevent suicide or serious bodily injury, or to
prevent a crime involving or threatening bodily harm, damage to or loss of
property, or a breach of the peace. The right to use force in crime prevention
is a concomitant of the right to use force to make an arrest spelled out in
§703-307. It is, however, limited by all of the limitations expressed in the
preceding sections. Deadly force may not be used except for the purpose of
preventing a crime which will cause death or serious bodily injury, under
circumstances in which there is no substantial risk of injury to innocent
persons. Deadly force may also be used if the actor believes such force is
necessary to suppress a riot, following an appropriate warning.
Subsection (2) contains a rule about the use of confinement
as preventive force, similar to the rules on the same subject in §§703-304 to
306.
Previous Hawaii case law did not distinguish the defense
presented in this section from that in §703-307, on the use of force in law
enforcement.[1] The Code provides clarification on the issue.
__________
§703-308 Commentary:
1. Provisional Government v. Caecires, 9 Haw. 522, 533 (1894).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
24
cases (
4 in the last 5 years), 1978–2025 · leading case:
State v. Graybeard, 6 P.3d 385 (Haw. App. 2000).
State v. Graybeard, 6 P.3d 385 (Haw. App. 2000).
· cites it 6× “Graybeard also argues that his “threat” against Martinez was justified in defense of property (the chickens) and therefore not criminal, citing HRS § 703-306 and HRS § 703-308. Graybeard argues that “he was simply attempting to stop Mr.”
State v. Mark, 231 P.3d 478 (Haw. 2010).
· cites it 3× “HRS § 703-308, which justifies the use of force upon another person if the force is enough to prevent, inter alia, suicide or the commission of a crime, is not relevant to this case.”
State v. Augustin, 63 P.3d 1097 (Haw. 2002).
· cites it 2× “HRS § 703-304 (1993), governing the defense of self-defense or the "[u]se of force in self-protection," provides in relevant part as follows: (1) Subject to the provisions of this section and of section 703-308 [regarding the use of force to prevent suicide or the commission of…”
State v. Deleon., 319 P.3d 382 (Haw. 2014).
· cites it 2× “2009) provides, in relevant part: (1) Subject to the provisions of this section and of section 703-308, the use of force upon or toward another person is justifiable when the actor believes that such force is immediately necessary for the purpose of protecting himself against…”
State v. Walsh, 260 P.3d 350 (Haw. 2011).
· cites it 2× “(1) Subject to the provisions of this section and of section 703-308, the use of force upon or toward another person is justifiable when the actor believes that such force is immediately necessary for the purpose of protecting himself against the use of unlawful force by the…”
State v. Nupeiset, 977 P.2d 183 (Haw. App. 1999).
· cites it 3× “HRS § 703-308 (1993) concerns the use of force to prevent suicide or the commission of a crime and is not germane to this case.”
State v. Feliciano, 115 P.3d 648 (Haw. 2005).
· cites it 2× “[24] HRS § 703-304, entitled "Use of force in self-protection," provides: (1) Subject to the provisions of this section and of section 703-308, the use of force upon or toward another person is justifiable when the actor believes that such force is immediately necessary for the…”
State v. Padilla, 164 P.3d 765 (Haw. App. 2007).
“(1) Subject to the provisions of this section and of section 703-308, the use of force upon or toward another person is justifiable when the actor believes that such force is immediately necessary for the purpose of protecting himself against the use of unlawful force by the…”
State v. McNulty, 588 P.2d 438 (Haw. 1978).
“HRS §§ 703-304(1) and (2)(1976), the relevant self-defense provisions, state: (1) Subject to the provisions of this section and section 703-308, the use of force upon or toward another person is justifiable when the actor believes that *262 such force is immediately necessary…”
State v. Matuu., 445 P.3d 91 (Haw. 2019).
“(1) Subject to the provisions of this section and of section 703-308, the use of force upon or toward another person is justifiable when the actor believes that such force is immediately necessary for the purpose of protecting himself against the use of unlawful force by the…”
State v. Van Dyke, 69 P.3d 88 (Haw. 2003).
“HRS § 703-304, Hawaii’s self-defense statute, provides in relevant part: (1) Subject to the provisions of this section and of section 703-308, the use of force upon or toward another person is justifiable when the actor believes that such force is immediately necessary for the…”
State v. Lubong, 886 P.2d 766 (Haw. App. 1994).
“(1) Subject to the provisions of this section and of section 703-308, the use of force upon or toward another person is justifiable when the actor believes that such force is immediately necessary for the purpose of protecting himself against the use of unlawful force by the…”
— Haw. Rev. Stat. § 703-308(1) — 2 cases
State v. Graybeard, 6 P.3d 385 (Haw. App. 2000).
“Graybeard also argues that his “threat” against Martinez was justified in defense of property (the chickens) and therefore not criminal, citing HRS § 703-306 and HRS § 703-308. Graybeard argues that “he was simply attempting to stop Mr.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.