Haw. Rev. Stat. » Haw. Rev. Stat. / Chapter 706
Hawaii Revised Statutes

Haw. Rev. Stat. § 706-600 (2026)

  Sentence in accordance with this chapter; other applicable law

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section HI-LEGcapitol.hawaii.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

PART I.  PRE-SENTENCE INVESTIGATION AND REPORT, AUTHORIZED

DISPOSITION, AND CLASSES OF FELONIES

 

Law Journals and Reviews

 

  Comments and Questions About Mental Health Law in Hawaii.  13 HBJ, no. 4, at 13 (1978).

 

     §706-600  Sentence in accordance with this chapter; other applicable law.  A sentence shall be imposed in accordance with this chapter, unless otherwise provided by applicable law. [L 1972, c 9, pt of §1; am L 1986, c 314, §10; am L 2022, c 43, §6]

 

COMMENTARY ON §706-600

 

  This section establishes that dispositions for all offenses--whether defined within or outside of the Penal Code--are to be imposed in accordance with this chapter and that, except for the power of the court to impose "incidental civil sanctions such as forfeitures of property, suspension or cancellation of licenses, removal from office and the like," as provided in §706-605(4), "the only dispositions authorized are those permitted by the Code."[1]

  The Penal Code, in centralizing provisions relating to the disposition of convicted defendants in one chapter, differs from previous law which provided a separate sanction (fine or imprisonment or both) for each offense.  This resulted in authorized sentences which, when considered in relation to the potential danger to the person resulting from the commission of each offense, gave rise to a sense of inconsistency.  An act of destruction of real or personal property with intent to hinder the United States in its military preparations was given a 20-year sentence and a $10,000 fine[2] while kidnapping was deemed worthy of a life sentence but only a $1,000[3] fine.  An offense delicately called "carnal abuse" of a female child under twelve years of age was punishable by life imprisonment,[4] whereas manslaughter, defined as killing without malice aforethought, received a relatively lenient ten-year sentence.[5]  Larceny from the person drew a two-year sentence and a $2,000 fine,[6] whereas simple larceny, not involving any potential danger to the person, was punished by a ten-year sentence but no fine at all.[7]  None of the penalties mentioned is inherently wrong, although most are questionable, but taken together they reflect no consistent policy.

  By centralizing sentencing the Code seeks to achieve an internal consistency which is lacking under previous law.

 

SUPPLEMENTAL COMMENTARY ON §706-600

 

  Act 43, Session Laws 2022, made conforming amendments to this section to authorize the imposition of sentences for offenses in accordance with applicable laws other than as provided in chapter 706.  These conforming amendments facilitated other amendments made by Act 43 clarifying that a court is required to impose a sentence for domestic violence intervention, with or without probation, for violations of restraining orders, orders for protection, and abuse of family or household members.  The legislature found that §586-4 authorizes a family court to order a violator of a temporary restraining order to undergo mandatory domestic violence intervention.  However, the legislature found that the Hawaii Supreme Court misinterpreted §586-4(e) by holding that domestic violence intervention may only be ordered as a condition of probation.  The legislature noted that domestic violence intervention, which includes anger management and domestic violence treatment, is an important part of addressing the root causes of domestic violence.  Act 43 highlighted the importance of domestic violence intervention and clarified legislative intent by clearly mandating domestic violence intervention regardless of whether persons are sentenced with or without probation for violations of restraining orders, orders for protection, or abuse of family or household members.  Senate Standing Committee Report No. 3853, House Standing Committee Report No. 777-22, Senate Standing Committee Report No. 3444.

 

Case Notes

 

  As §706-661 and this section do not authorize a court to impose a single sentence on a defendant who has been convicted of multiple charges, trial court did not violate plea agreement by imposing a life term for each class A felony defendant was convicted of, and then running each life term concurrently.  91 H. 20, 979 P.2d 1046 (1999).

 

__________

§706-600 Commentary:

 

1.  M.P.C., Tentative Draft No. 2, comments at 12 (1954).

 

2.  H.R.S. §767-2.

 

3.  Id. §749-1.

 

4.  Id. §768-36.

 

5.  Id. §748-7.

 

6.  Id. §750-22.

 

7.  Id. §750-19.

 

 

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 25 cases (4 in the last 5 years), 1980–2025 · leading case: Barnett v. State, 979 P.2d 1046 (Haw. 1999).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Barnett v. State, 979 P.2d 1046 (Haw. 1999). · cites it 4× “HRS § 706-600 (1993) provides, in relevant part, that “[n]o sentence shall be imposed otherwise than in accordance with this chapter.”
State v. Chow, 883 P.2d 663 (Haw. App. 1994). · cites it 4× “HRS § 706-600 (Supp.1992) states that “[n]o sentence shall be imposed otherwise than in accordance with this chapter [706] [ (Disposition of Convicted Defendants) ].”
State v. Medeiros., 454 P.3d 1069 (Haw. 2019). · cites it 8× “Pursuant to HRS § 706-600 (2014), “[n]o sentence shall be imposed otherwise than in accordance with [HRS] chapter [706].”
State v. Hussein. , 229 P.3d 313 (Haw. 2010). · cites it 2× “HRS § 706-600 (1993). HRS § 706-602(1) provides that, in the sentencing procedure, the PSI is prepared “by personnel assigned to the court, intake service center or other agency designated by the eourt[.”
State v. Locquiao, 58 P.3d 1242 (Haw. 2002). · cites it 2× “Any person who violates this section is guilty of a class C felony and upon conviction may be imprisoned pursuant to section 706-600 and, if appropriate as provided in section 706-641, fined pursuant to section 706-640.”
State v. Agdinaoay., 500 P.3d 408 (Haw. 2021). · cites it 8× “” HRS § 706-600 (emphasis added). The command is clear.”
State v. Casugay-Badiang. , 305 P.3d 437 (Haw. 2013). · cites it 4× “6 See HRS § 706-600 (1993)(“No sentence shall be imposed otherwise than in accordance with this chapter.”
State v. Murray, 621 P.2d 334 (Haw. 1980). · cites it 2× “The court shall not sentence the convicted person only to perform such services unless, having regard to the nature and circumstances of the crime and to the history and character of the defendant, it is of the opinion that such services alone suffice for the protection of the…”
State v. Sinagoga, 918 P.2d 228 (Haw. App. 1996). · cites it 2× “§ 706-600 Sentence in accordance with this chapter.”
State v. Anzalone., 412 P.3d 951 (Haw. 2018). · cites it 4× “Second, Anzalone contended that the family court lacked the authority to require her to pay extradition costs because: (1) pursuant to HRS § 706-600, 6 criminal defendants can only be sentenced pursuant to HRS Chapter 706, and the family court's authority to order payment of…”
State v. March, 11 P.3d 1094 (Haw. 2000). · cites it 4× “And, HRS § 706-600 (1993) expressly precludes the imposition of any sentence not authorized by chapter 706.”
State v. Asuncion, 205 P.3d 577 (Haw. App. 2009). · cites it 4× “HRS § 706-600 (1993) expressly states that “[n]o sentence shall be imposed otherwise than in accordance with this chapter.”
Show all 25 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.