ILCS » Chapter 225 · Act 60
Illinois Compiled Statutes

225 ILCS 60/43 (2026)

Restoration of license from discipline

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(225 ILCS 60/43) (from Ch. 111, par. 4400-43)
    (Section scheduled to be repealed on January 1, 2027)
    Sec. 43. Restoration of license from discipline. At any time after the successful completion of a term of probation, suspension, or revocation of a license, the Department may restore the license to the licensee, unless after an investigation and a hearing, the Secretary determines that restoration is not in the public interest. No person or entity whose license or permit has been revoked as authorized in this Act may apply for restoration of that license or permit until such time as provided for in the Civil Administrative Code of Illinois.
(Source: P.A. 97-622, eff. 11-23-11.)

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1998–2025 · leading case: Ikpoh v. Dep't of Prof'l Reg., 789 N.E.2d 442 (Ill. App. Ct. 2003).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Ikpoh v. Dep't of Prof'l Reg., 789 N.E.2d 442 (Ill. App. Ct. 2003). · cites it 4× “The relevant provisions of the Act are section 22 (225 ILCS 60/22 (West 2000)) and section 43 (225 ILCS 60/43 (West 2000)). Section 22 of the Act provides as follows: “The Department may revoke, suspend, place on probationary status, or take any other disciplinary action as the…”
Albazzaz v. Dep't of Prof'l Reg., 731 N.E.2d 787 (Ill. App. Ct. 2000). · cites it 2× “” 225 ILCS 60/43 (West 1998). Albazzaz contends, without citation to relevant authority, that section 43 allows a license to be restored at any time, and thus any attempt by the Department to impose a minimum duration for suspension is in conflict with this language and…”
Pasic v. Dep't of Fin. & Prof'l Reg., 2022 IL App (1st) 220076 (Ill. App. Ct. 2022). “” 225 ILCS 60/43 (West 2020). The 7 1-22-0076 Disciplinary Board has defined the standards it uses to determine whether a physician has been sufficiently rehabilitated following a suspension so as to warrant the public trust.”
Krain v. Ill. Dept. of Prof'l Reg., 696 N.E.2d 692 (Ill. App. Ct. 1998). “225 ILCS 60/43 (West 1996). This section provides that the Department may restore or reinstate a license upon the recommendation of the Medical Disciplinary Board.”
Rodriquez v. Dep't of Fin. & Prof'l Reg., 870 N.E.2d 1029 (Ill. App. Ct. 2007). “225 ILCS 60/43 (West 2004). A detailed comparison of the Act with the sections rendered inapplicable under section 2105 — 150 demonstrates the legislature’s intention to restrict all proceedings on complaints under section 22 of the Act to the procedures established in the Act.”
Leone v. Div. of Prof'l Reg. of the Dep't of Fin. & Prof'l Reg., 2024 IL App (4th) 220753 (Ill. App. Ct. 2024). “” (Emphasis added) (225 ILCS 60/43 (West 2022)). This, - 27 - he argues, means any suspension must have a definite term.”
Lavery v. Dep't of Fin. & Prof'l Reg., 2025 IL 130033 (Ill. 2025). “” 225 ILCS 60/43 (West 2020) (restoration of license from discipline).”
Ikpoh v. Dep't of Prof'l Reg. (Ill. App. Ct. 2003). · cites it 4× “The relevant provisions of the Act are section 22 (225 ILCS 60/22 (West 2000)) and section 43 (225 ILCS 60/43 (West 2000)) . Section 22 of the Act provides as follows: “The Department may revoke, suspend, place on probationary status, or take any other disciplinary action as the…”
Albazzaz v. Dept. of Prof'l Reg. (Ill. App. Ct. 2000). · cites it 2× “" (225 ILCS 60/43 (1998)). Albazzaz contends, without citation to relevant authority, that 60/43 allows a license to be restored at any time, and thus any attempt by the Department to impose a minimum duration for suspension is in conflict with this language and impermissible.”
Krain v. Illinois Dept. of Prof'l Reg. (Ill. App. Ct. 1998). “225 ILCS 60/43 (West, 1996). This section provides that the Department may restore or reinstate a license upon the recommendation of the Medical Disciplinary Board.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.