K.S.A. » Chapter 21
Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 21-4711 (2026)

Repealed

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

21-4711.

History: L. 1992, ch. 239, § 11; L. 1993, ch. 291, § 260; L. 1994, ch. 291, § 55; L. 1996, ch. 158, § 5; L. 1999, ch. 164, § 19; L. 2001, ch. 200, § 17; L. 2004, ch. 30, § 1; Repealed, L. 2010, ch. 136, § 307; July 1, 2011.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 110 cases (13 in the last 5 years), 1994–2025 · leading case: State v. Keel, 357 P.3d 251 (Kan. 2015).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Keel, 357 P.3d 251 (Kan. 2015). · cites it 9× “21-6811 (formerly K.S.A. 21-4711) stating that, for criminal history purposes, a conviction or juvenile adjudication for an offense committed prior to July 1, 1993, shall be scored as a person or nonperson crime based on the classification in effect for the comparable offense…”
State v. Manbeck, 83 P.3d 190 (Kan. 2004). · cites it 15× “Pursuant to K.S.A. 2002 Supp. 21-4711(c)(2), the presentence investigation report gave Manbeck a criminal history score which included his four previous DUI convictions as person felonies.”
State v. Vega-Fuentes, 955 P.2d 1235 (Kan. 1998). · cites it 20× “On the issue of whether the district court erred in aggregating the defendant’s convictions for violations of municipal ordinances, the Court of Appeals concluded that while convictions for the violation of municipal ordinances become part of criminal history, they may not be…”
State v. Clark, 486 P.3d 591 (Kan. 2021). · cites it 6× “Under this construction of the statute, the district court concluded that Clark's out-of-state conviction was "comparable" to the Kansas crime of battery of a law enforcement officer and classified the out-of-state conviction as a person offense.”
State v. Wetrich, 412 P.3d 984 (Kan. 2018). · cites it 3× “21-6811(d)(1) (previously **556 K.S.A. 21-4711 [d][1] ), which provides for the scoring as a person felony of any prior conviction or adjudication that "was classified as a burglary as defined in K.”
State v. Gales, 476 P.3d 412 (Kan. 2020). · cites it 10× “At the time of Gales' conviction and original sentencing, K.S.A. 21-4711 provided: 8 "[T]he following shall apply in determining an offender's criminal history classification as contained in the presumptive sentencing guidelines grid for nondrug crimes and the presumptive…”
State v. Murdock, 439 P.3d 307 (Kan. 2019). · cites it 2× “At the time of Murdock's current offense, K.S.A. 21-4711(e) governed the classification of out-of-state convictions for criminal history purposes.”
State v. Weber, 442 P.3d 1044 (Kan. 2019). · cites it 3× “An out-of-state crime will be classified as either a felony or a misdemeanor according to the convicting jurisdiction.”
State v. Obregon, 444 P.3d 331 (Kan. 2019). · cites it 2× “If the state of Kansas does not have a comparable offense in effect on the date the current crime of conviction was committed, the out-of-state conviction shall be classified as a nonperson crime." (Emphasis added.”
State v. Vandervort, 72 P.3d 925 (Kan. 2003). · cites it 3× “An out-of-state crime will be classified as either a felony or a misdemeanor according to the convicting jurisdiction.”
State v. Sartin, 446 P.3d 1068 (Kan. 2019). · cites it 2× “Prior convictions for person felonies increase the criminal history score more than nonperson felony convictions and, thus, result in longer prison terms. Of particular importance here is that his prior out-of-state convictions were compared to Kansas crimes when calculating…”
State v. Hankins, 372 P.3d 1124 (Kan. 2016). · cites it 2× “21-4710(d)(2), including an offender's out-of-state convictions and juvenile adjudications, K.S.A. 21-4711(e). The question presented here is whether Hankins' Oklahoma deferred judgment is to be classified as an out-of-state felony conviction for criminal history classification…”
Show all 110 citing cases →
— K.S.A. § 21-4711(a) — 23 cases
State v. Vega-Fuentes, 955 P.2d 1235 (Kan. 1998). “On the issue of whether the district court erred in aggregating the defendant’s convictions for violations of municipal ordinances, the Court of Appeals concluded that while convictions for the violation of municipal ordinances become part of criminal history, they may not be…”
State v. Dickey, 350 P.3d 1054 (Kan. 2015).
State v. Delacruz, 899 P.2d 1042 (Kan. 1995).
State v. Neal, 258 P.3d 365 (Kan. 2011).
State v. Youngblood, 206 P.3d 518 (Kan. 2009).
— K.S.A. § 21-4711(c) — 3 cases
State v. Briggs, 950 P.2d 273 (Kan. Ct. App. 1997).
State v. Obiero (Kan. Ct. App. 2022).
State v. Obiero (Kan. Ct. App. 2022).
— K.S.A. § 21-4711(c)(2) — 4 cases
State v. Manbeck, 83 P.3d 190 (Kan. 2004). “Pursuant to K.S.A. 2002 Supp. 21-4711(c)(2), the presentence investigation report gave Manbeck a criminal history score which included his four previous DUI convictions as person felonies.”
State v. Brown, 124 P.3d 1035 (Kan. Ct. App. 2005).
State v. Manbeck, 69 P.3d 636 (Kan. Ct. App. 2003).
State v. Scheuerman, 82 P.3d 515 (Kan. Ct. App. 2003).
— K.S.A. § 21-4711(d) — 10 cases
State v. Gales, 452 P.3d 868 (Kan. Ct. App. 2019).
State v. Thomas, 383 P.3d 152 (Kan. Ct. App. 2016).
State v. Gales, 476 P.3d 412 (Kan. 2020). “At the time of Gales' conviction and original sentencing, K.S.A. 21-4711 provided: 8 "[T]he following shall apply in determining an offender's criminal history classification as contained in the presumptive sentencing guidelines grid for nondrug crimes and the presumptive…”
State v. May, 186 P.3d 847 (Kan. Ct. App. 2008).
State v. Fifer, 881 P.2d 589 (Kan. Ct. App. 1994).
— K.S.A. § 21-4711(d)(1) — 1 case
State v. Haskins, 942 P.2d 16 (Kan. 1997).
— K.S.A. § 21-4711(d)(2) — 2 cases
State v. Alvis, 53 P.3d 1232 (Kan. Ct. App. 2002).
State v. May, 186 P.3d 847 (Kan. Ct. App. 2008).
— K.S.A. § 21-4711(d)(l) — 2 cases
State v. Alvis, 53 P.3d 1232 (Kan. Ct. App. 2002).
State v. May, 186 P.3d 847 (Kan. Ct. App. 2008).
— K.S.A. § 21-4711(e) — 51 cases
State v. Keel, 357 P.3d 251 (Kan. 2015). “21-6811 (formerly K.S.A. 21-4711) stating that, for criminal history purposes, a conviction or juvenile adjudication for an offense committed prior to July 1, 1993, shall be scored as a person or nonperson crime based on the classification in effect for the comparable offense…”
State v. Clark, 486 P.3d 591 (Kan. 2021). “Under this construction of the statute, the district court concluded that Clark's out-of-state conviction was "comparable" to the Kansas crime of battery of a law enforcement officer and classified the out-of-state conviction as a person offense.”
State v. Murdock, 439 P.3d 307 (Kan. 2019). “At the time of Murdock's current offense, K.S.A. 21-4711(e) governed the classification of out-of-state convictions for criminal history purposes.”
State v. Gales, 476 P.3d 412 (Kan. 2020). “At the time of Gales' conviction and original sentencing, K.S.A. 21-4711 provided: 8 "[T]he following shall apply in determining an offender's criminal history classification as contained in the presumptive sentencing guidelines grid for nondrug crimes and the presumptive…”
State v. Weber, 442 P.3d 1044 (Kan. 2019). “An out-of-state crime will be classified as either a felony or a misdemeanor according to the convicting jurisdiction.”
— K.S.A. § 21-4711(f) — 8 cases
State v. Keel, 357 P.3d 251 (Kan. 2015). “21-6811 (formerly K.S.A. 21-4711) stating that, for criminal history purposes, a conviction or juvenile adjudication for an offense committed prior to July 1, 1993, shall be scored as a person or nonperson crime based on the classification in effect for the comparable offense…”
State v. MacIas, 39 P.3d 85 (Kan. Ct. App. 2002).
State v. Pope, 927 P.2d 503 (Kan. Ct. App. 1996).
State v. Presha, 8 P.3d 14 (Kan. Ct. App. 2000).
In re J.M., 44 P.3d 429 (Kan. 2002).
— K.S.A. § 21-4711(g) — 3 cases
State v. Keel, 357 P.3d 251 (Kan. 2015). “21-6811 (formerly K.S.A. 21-4711) stating that, for criminal history purposes, a conviction or juvenile adjudication for an offense committed prior to July 1, 1993, shall be scored as a person or nonperson crime based on the classification in effect for the comparable offense…”
State v. LaGrange, 901 P.2d 44 (Kan. Ct. App. 1995).
State v. Luarks, 360 P.3d 418 (Kan. 2015).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.