History:
L. 1972, ch. 234, § 36; L. 1988, ch. 258, § 2; Repealed, L. 1994, ch. 339, § 28; July 1.
CASE ANNOTATIONS
1. Provision of former section (K.S.A. 65-2517) making it unnecessary to negate exceptions applied; not unconstitutional. State v. Carter, 214 Kan. 533, 535, 536, 521 P.2d 294.
2. Instructions under subsection (c) sufficient; conviction of conspiracy to deliver cocaine affirmed. State v. Glazer, 223 Kan. 351, 355, 574 P.2d 942.
State v. Glazer, 574 P.2d 942 (Kan. 1978). · cites it 4ד65-4116(c) and (d), or K.S.A. 65-4136. At the trial Glazer’s defense rested upon the exemption from liability recognized in K.”
State v. Gunn, 26 P.3d 710 (Kan. Ct. App. 2001). · cites it 3דIn 1988, K.S.A. 65-4136 was restricted by the legislature to apply only in cases seeking forfeiture under K.”
State v. Gunn, 26 P.3d 710 (Kan. Ct. App. 2001). “In 1988, K.S.A. 65-4136 was restricted by the legislature to apply only in cases seeking forfeiture under K.”
— K.S.A. § 65-4136(c) — 1 case
State v. Glazer, 574 P.2d 942 (Kan. 1978). “65-4116(c) and (d), or K.S.A. 65-4136. At the trial Glazer’s defense rested upon the exemption from liability recognized in K.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.