Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 122.40 (2026)
[Repealed]
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
[Repealed, 1957 c 947 art 9 s 9]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7
cases, 1952–2012 · leading case: Emerson v. Bd. of Indep. Sch. Dist. 199, 809 N.W.2d 679 (Minn. 2012).
Emerson v. Bd. of Indep. Sch. Dist. 199, 809 N.W.2d 679 (Minn. 2012). “The school board denied the grievance on the ground that Emerson was only a *681 "teacher" when he was employed for 1 year as middle school principal, and therefore was still within the probationary period under Minn.Stat. § 122.40, and could be terminated at the discretion of…”
State ex rel. Klitzke v. Indep. Consol. Sch. Dist. No. 88, 61 N.W.2d 410 (Minn. 1953). “52? (4) Where a part of a school area proposed to be reorganized under § 122.40, et seq., is set over to an adjoining district by a board of county commissioners pursuant to § 122.”
Bricelyn Sch. Dist. No. 132 v. Bd. of Cnty. Commissioners, 55 N.W.2d 597 (Minn. 1952). “1949, §§ 122.40 to 122.57), providing a new method for the reorganization of school districts in Minnesota.”
Sullivan v. Jt. Indep. Consol. Sch. Dist. No. 102, 88 N.W.2d 1 (Minn. 1958). “No single district voting unfavorably may defeat the consolidation.”
State Ex Rel. Helling v. Indep. Consol. Sch. Dist. No. 160, 92 N.W.2d 70 (Minn. 1958). “3, reads: “In case an election for reorganization has been held in accordance with the provisions of sections 122.40 to 122.57, and such election has failed, another election in any proposed district may be held at which time the same recommendation or a revised recommendation,…”
Indep. Consol. Sch. Dist. No. 66 v. Big Stone Cnty., 67 N.W.2d 903 (Minn. 1954). “27, or from a school district reorganized in accordance with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Sections 122.40 to 122.57, subsequent to the elections on consolidation or reorganization, such petitions shall be approved by the school board of such consolidated or reorganized…”
Frost Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 131 v. Bd. of Cnty. Commissioners, 55 N.W.2d 602 (Minn. 1952). “*63 1949, §§ 122.40 to 122.57, commonly known as the school district reorganization act.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.