Minn. Stat. » CHAPTER 260. JUVENILE COURT; CHILD PLACEMENT; COMPACTS
Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 260.191 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

[Repealed, 1999 c 139 art 4 s 3]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 43 cases, 1964–2000 · leading case: Matter of Welfare of JM, 574 N.W.2d 717 (Minn. 1998).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Matter of Welfare of JM, 574 N.W.2d 717 (Minn. 1998). · cites it 28× “At a hearing on July 25, 1996, Hennepin County argued that the juvenile court had no authority to place the three children in long-term foster care because the permanency statute, Minn.Stat. § 260.191, subd. 3b (1996), prohibits such placement of a child under age 12 unless the…”
In Re the Welfare of J.J.B., 390 N.W.2d 274 (Minn. 1986). · cites it 6× “” Pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 260.191, subd. 1 (1978), custody of J.”
In Re the Welfare of C.K., 426 N.W.2d 842 (Minn. 1988). · cites it 8× “f findings substantiating a conclusion that it is for the best interest of these two children to return them to this environment, which during all the times of their life in the home has been one of gross child abuse — makes it literally impossible under appropriate review…”
In Re Welfare of MH, 595 N.W.2d 223 (Minn. Ct. App. 1999). · cites it 13× “On appeal, Lisa Dickie challenges the constitutionality of Minn.Stat. § 260.191, subd. 3b (1998). ISSUES I.”
In Re the Welfare of J.W., 415 N.W.2d 879 (Minn. 1987). · cites it 4× “Dispositions of children determined to be neglected and dependent are governed by Minn.Stat. § 260.191 (1986) and by Minn.R.”
In Re the Welfare of A.R.G.-B., 551 N.W.2d 256 (Minn. Ct. App. 1996). · cites it 18× “’s best interests require her permanent placement with the maternal grandparents pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 260.191, subd. 3b(a)(l) (1994).”
In Re the Welfare of J.W., 391 N.W.2d 791 (Minn. 1986). · cites it 4× “6(d) and 10(b) (1984) and transferring custody of the children to the county under Minn.Stat. § 260.191, subd. 1(b)(2) (1984).”
Spaeth v. Warren, 478 N.W.2d 319 (Minn. Ct. App. 1991). · cites it 4× “28 (1984) (adoption); Minn.Stat. § 260.191 subd. 1a (1984) (disposition of children abused, neglected, dependent or neglected and in foster care); Minn.”
In Re the Welfare of A.J.C., 556 N.W.2d 616 (Minn. Ct. App. 1996). · cites it 4× “When contemplating the alternative of long-term foster care, the court must consider the limits on that care mandated by Minn.Stat. § 260.191, subd. 3b(a)(3) (1996).”
In Re the Welfare of D.L., 486 N.W.2d 375 (Minn. 1992). · cites it 2× “2(a) (preference for in-home placement under the Indian Child Welfare Act); Minn.Stat. § 260.191, subd. la(d) (children in need of protection); Minn.”
In Re the Welfare of M.M., 452 N.W.2d 236 (Minn. 1990). · cites it 2× “, Minn.Stat. § 260.191, subd. la(a) (1988).”
Turkel v. Ramsey Cnty. Welfare Bd., 127 N.W.2d 702 (Minn. 1964). · cites it 3× “235 provides: “If, aftér a hearing, the court does not terminate parental rights but determines that conditions of neglect or dependency exist, the court may find the child neglected or dependent and may enter an order in accordance with the provisions of section 260.191.” This…”
Show all 43 citing cases →
— Minn. Stat. § 260.191(l)(a) — 1 case
In re the Welfare of G.S., 352 N.W.2d 511 (Minn. Ct. App. 1984).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.