Neb. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 29
Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-3501 (2026)

Security, Privacy, and Dissemination of Criminal History Information Act, how cited

✓ text as last checked Oct. 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Sections 29-209, 29-210, 29-3501 to 29-3528, and 81-1423 shall be known and may be cited as the Security, Privacy, and Dissemination of Criminal History Information Act.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1989–2025 · leading case: Slansky v. Nebraska State Patrol, 685 N.W.2d 335 (Neb. 2004).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Slansky v. Nebraska State Patrol, 685 N.W.2d 335 (Neb. 2004). · cites it 2× “2002); record keeping of criminal histories, Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-3501 et seq. (Reissue 1995 & Supp.”
State v. Worm, 680 N.W.2d 151 (Neb. 2004). · cites it 2× “See Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 29-3501 to 29-3528 (Reissue 1995, Cum.”
State ex rel. Sileven v. Spire, 500 N.W.2d 179 (Neb. 1993). · cites it 2× “First, the relator claims that the district court erred by not using a standard different from that applicable to the general public to his request for information because he is a person in interest under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-3501 et seq. (Reissue 1989).”
Doe v. State, 980 N.W.2d 842 (Neb. 2022). · cites it 2× “- 670 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 312 Nebraska Reports DOE V.”
State v. Guida, 434 N.W.2d 522 (Neb. 1989). · cites it 2× “The purpose of the act is (1) to control and coordinate criminal offender recordkeeping, (2) to establish more efficient and uniform systems of criminal offender recordkeeping, (3) to assure periodic audits of recordkeeping, (4) to establish a more effective administrative…”
Doe v. State, 312 Neb. 665 (2022). · cites it 2× “- 670 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 312 Nebraska Reports DOE V.”
Payne v. Geer, No. 8:23-cv-00427 (D. Neb. July 23, 2025). · cites it 2× “§ 29-3501 , et. seq. Herman does not delineate what, if anything, she is refusing to disclose on this basis.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.