Neb. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 48
Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 48-1228 (2026)

Act, how cited

✓ text as last checked Oct. 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Sections 48-1228 to 48-1236 shall be known and may be cited as the Nebraska Wage Payment and Collection Act.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 77 cases (8 in the last 5 years), 1982–2026 · leading case: Mays v. Midnite Dreams, Inc., 915 N.W.2d 71 (Neb. 2018).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Mays v. Midnite Dreams, Inc., 915 N.W.2d 71 (Neb. 2018). · cites it 2× “Neb. Rev. Stat. § 48-1228 et seq. (Reissue 2010 & Cum.”
Fisher v. PayFlex Sys. USA, 829 N.W.2d 703 (Neb. 2013). · cites it 4× “PayFlex’s employee manual set out its PTO rules 1 See Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 48-1228 to 48-1232 (Reissue 2010).”
Rauscher v. City of Lincoln, 691 N.W.2d 844 (Neb. 2005). · cites it 4× “The district court also ordered the City, in accordance with the Nebraska Wage Payment and Collection Act, Neb. Rev. Stat. § 48-1228 et seq. (Reissue 2004), to pay Rauscher’s attorney fees.”
Law Offices of Ronald J. Palagi v. Howard, 747 N.W.2d 1 (Neb. 2008). · cites it 2× “S-06-384, we affirm the judgment of dismissal entered by the district court. JUDGMENT IN NO. S-06-384 AFFIRMED.”
Drought v. Marsh, 937 N.W.2d 229 (Neb. 2020). · cites it 2× “2018 & Supp. 2019). - 862 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 304 Nebraska Reports DROUGHT v.”
Trosper v. Bag 'N Save, 734 N.W.2d 704 (Neb. 2007). · cites it 4× “[12] See Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 48-1228 to 48-1232 (Reissue 2004).”
Waite v. AS Battiato Co., 469 N.W.2d 766 (Neb. 1991). · cites it 10× “The court denied his claim for attorney fees under the Nebraska Wage Payment and Collection Act, Neb.Rev.Stat. §§ 48-1228 et seq. (Reissues 1984 & 1988), and Waite contends that determination is erroneous.”
Cleasby v. Leo A. Daly Co., 376 N.W.2d 312 (Neb. 1985). · cites it 6× “He assigns as error (1) the ruling of the trial court that the contract was not fully integrated and that there was an implied right of Daly to terminate the contract upon good cause shown, (2) the court's instructions on plaintiff's burden of proof and damages, and (3) the…”
Billingsley v. BFM Liquor Mgmt., Inc., 645 N.W.2d 791 (Neb. 2002). · cites it 3× “§§ 48-1001 to 48-1010 (Reissue 1998), and the Nebraska Wage Payment and Collection Act (wage payment act), Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 48-1228 to 48-1232 (Reissue 1998).”
Hawkins v. City of Omaha, 627 N.W.2d 118 (Neb. 2001). · cites it 2× “Applicability of Nebraska Wage Payment and Collection Act The City contends the trial court erred in awarding plaintiffs attorney fees pursuant to the Nebraska Wage Payment and Collection Act, Neb. Rev. Stat. § 48-1228 et seq. (Reissue 1998).”
Acklie v. Greater Omaha Packing Co., 944 N.W.2d 297 (Neb. 2020). · cites it 2× “§ 48-1228 et seq. (Reissue 2010, Cum. Supp. 2018 & Supp.”
Jackson v. Morris Commc'ns Corp., 657 N.W.2d 634 (Neb. 2003). · cites it 2× “More recently, we refused to find a public policy exception when an employee was discharged for asserting a claim under the Nebraska Wage Payment and Collection Act, Neb. Rev. Stat. § 48-1228 et seq. (Reissue 1998).”
Show all 77 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.