Neb. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 52
Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 52-125 (2026)

Act, how cited

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Sections 52-125 to 52-159 shall be known and may be cited as the Nebraska Construction Lien Act.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 27 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1984–2026 · leading case: Tilt-Up Concrete, Inc. v. Star City/Fed., Inc., 621 N.W.2d 502 (Neb. 2001).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Tilt-Up Concrete, Inc. v. Star City/Fed., Inc., 621 N.W.2d 502 (Neb. 2001). · cites it 3× “*68 Effect of Nebraska Construction Lien Act Tilt-Up’s construction lien was brought under the Nebraska Construction Lien Act (NCLA), Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 52-125 through 52-159 (Reissue 1998).”
Lincoln Lumber Co. v. Lancaster, 618 N.W.2d 676 (Neb. 2000). · cites it 3× “This is an appeal from a foreclosure action on construction liens filed under the Nebraska Construction Lien Act, Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 52-125 through 52-159 (Reissue 1998).”
Chicago Lumber Co. v. Sch. Dist. No. 71, 417 N.W.2d 757 (Neb. 1988). · cites it 2× “The Nebraska Construction Lien Act, Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 52-125 et seq. (Reissue 1984), does not apply to real estate owned by a governmental agency or political subdivision, and, hence, did not apply to the district’s real estate which was the subject of the renovation project.”
Echo Grp. v. Tradesmen Internat., 980 N.W.2d 869 (Neb. 2022). · cites it 2× “1 Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 52-125 to 52-159 (Reissue 2021).”
Tilt-Up Concrete, Inc. v. Star City/Fed., Inc., 582 N.W.2d 604 (Neb. 1998). · cites it 2× “Such a rule is not consistent with the purpose of the Nebraska Construction Lien Act (NCLA), see Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 52-125 through 52-159 (Reissue 1993).”
Franksen v. Crossroads Jt. Venture, 515 N.W.2d 794 (Neb. 1994). · cites it 2× “A person who furnishes services or materials pursuant to a real estate improvement contract has a construction lien, to the extent provided in the act, to secure the payment of his or her contract price.”
Blue Tee Corp. v. CDI Contractors, Inc., 529 N.W.2d 16 (Neb. 1995). · cites it 2× “CDI claimed that Blue Tee was not entitled to protection under the Nebraska Construction Lien Act, Neb. Rev. Stat. § 52-125 et seq. (Reissue 1993).”
Sorenson v. Dager, 601 N.W.2d 564 (Neb. Ct. App. 1999). · cites it 2× “BACKGROUND On April 9, 1996, Sorenson filed a petition for foreclosure of a construction lien under the Nebraska Construction Lien Act, Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 52-125 to 52-159 (Reissue 1998).”
Omaha Constr. Indus. Pension Plan v. Child.'s Hosp., 642 N.W.2d 849 (Neb. Ct. App. 2002). · cites it 3× “The Nebraska Construction Lien Act, Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 52-125 through 52-159 (Reissue 1998), is an almost verbatim version of article 5 of the Uniform Simplification of Land Transfers Act (Uniform Act).”
Payless Bldg. Ctr., Inc. v. Wilmoth, 581 N.W.2d 420 (Neb. 1998). · cites it 2× “The district court dismissed the action, concluding that being titled in the names of protected parties under the Nebraska Construction Lien Act, Neb. Rev. Stat. § 52-125 et seq. (Reissue 1993), the property was exempt from foreclosure.”
Preston Refrigeration v. Omaha Cold Storage, 742 N.W.2d 782 (Neb. Ct. App. 2007). · cites it 3× “From this authority and reasoning, Cold Storage argues that a construction lien foreclosure is a statutory action under Neb.Rev.Stat. § 52-125 et seq. (Reissue 2004) and that thus, a common law action for breach of contract cannot be combined therewith.”
Borrenpohl v. DaBeers Props., LLC, 755 N.W.2d 39 (Neb. 2008). · cites it 2× “Also on October 19, 2005, DaBeers executed a notice of commencement in accordance with the Nebraska Construction Lien Act (NCLA), Neb.Rev.Stat. § 52-125 et seq. (Reissue 2004).”
Show all 27 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.