All proceedings brought under sections 163.01 to 163.22 of the Revised Code shall be governed by the law applicable in civil actions and the Rules of Civil Procedure, including, but not limited to, the rules governing discovery, except as otherwise provided in those sections. The proceedings shall be advanced as a matter of immediate public interest and concern and shall be heard by the court at the earliest practicable moment.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 14
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1981–2021 · leading case: City of Norwood v. Horney, 853 N.E.2d 1115 (Ohio 2006).
City of Norwood v. Horney, 853 N.E.2d 1115 (Ohio 2006). · cites it 2דIt is therefore imperative that the property owner who prosecutes an appeal on other than the jury award of compensation adequately inform the appellate court of his dilemma, so that the appellate court might implement the special provision of R.C. 163.22 which mandates that…”
State ex rel. R.T.G., Inc. v. State, 780 N.E.2d 998 (Ohio 2002). “” R.C. 163.22. Unless a particular statute contains a limitation, a civil action must be commenced within a period prescribed in R.”
Sunoco Pipeline L.P. v. Teter, 2016-Ohio-7073. · cites it 2ד{¶15} Appellant timely appealed the trial court’s December 14, 2015 appropriation order. The trial court denied Appellant’s stay request; however, this court granted the request.”
State ex rel. R.T.G., Inc. v. State, 2002-Ohio-6716, 98 Ohio St. 3d 1. “” R.C. 163.22. Unless a particular statute contains a limitation, a civil action must be commenced within a period prescribed in R.”
Ohio Power Co. v. Burns, 2021-Ohio-2714, 176 N.E.3d 778. · cites it 3ד11, which governs the signing of pleadings, motions and other documents generally applies to appropriation proceedings. However, R.C. 163.”
Ohio Power Co. v. Duff, 2020-Ohio-4628. · cites it 2ד{¶ 16} R.C. 163.22 provides that "[a]ll proceedings brought under sections 163.”
City of Middletown v. Campbell, 486 N.E.2d 208 (Ohio Ct. App. 12th Dist. 1984). “See R.C. 163.22. The prompt adjudication of these cases enables public projects to be rapidly completed.”
Cleveland Bakers Union Local No. 19 Pension Fund v. State, 443 N.E.2d 999 (Ohio Ct. App. 8th Dist. 1981). “” R.C. 163.22. The burden of proof is upon the owner to show that the agency has no right to make the appropriation, that the appropriation is not necessary, or that the parties were unable to agree as to the fair market value of the property.”
State v. Penrod, 611 N.E.2d 996 (Ohio Ct. App. 4th Dist. 1992). “01 through R.C. 163.22, including R.C. 163.17, apply to appropriations of real property.”
Putnam Cty. Bd. of Commrs. v. Weis, 2019-Ohio-3720. · cites it 2ד5 {¶6} The trial court set the matters for trial on October 9-12, 2018, using an abbreviated scheduling due to R.C. 163.22, which requires appropriation proceedings to “be advanced as a matter of immediate public interest and concern and shall be heard by the court at the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.