Any party to a proceeding for an order confirming, modifying, correcting, or vacating an award made in an arbitration proceeding shall, at the time the application is filed with the clerk of the court of common pleas, also file the following papers with the clerk:
(A) The agreement, the selection or appointment, if any, of an additional arbitrator or umpire, and each written extension of the time within which to make the award;
(B) The award;
(C) Each notice, affidavit, or other paper used upon an application to confirm, modify, or correct the award, and a copy of each order of the court upon such an application.
The judgment entered in such proceeding shall be docketed as if rendered in an action.
The judgment so entered shall have in all respects the same effect as, and be subject to all laws relating to, a judgment in an action. Such judgment may be enforced as if rendered in an action in the court in which it is entered.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 36
cases (8 in the last 5 years), 1981–2026 · leading case: NCO Portfolio Mgmt. Inc. v. McAfee, 843 N.E.2d 1259 (Ohio Ct. App. 9th Dist. 2005).
NCO Portfolio Mgmt. Inc. v. McAfee, 843 N.E.2d 1259 (Ohio Ct. App. 9th Dist. 2005). · cites it 7דThe issue was heard by a magistrate, who dismissed NCO’s claim due to its failure to file the accompanying arbitration agreement, as is required by R.C. 2711.14. NCO filed objections with the trial court, which overruled the objections and ordered the claim dismissed pursuant to…”
Worldwide Asset Purchasing, L.L.C. v. Easterling, 928 N.E.2d 1148 (Ohio Ct. App. 10th Dist. 2009). · cites it 7ד{¶ 2} At issue on appeal is whether Worldwide’s motion to confirm the arbitration award sufficiently complied with R.C. 2711.14, which requires that the party seeking to enforce an award submit certain documents with its motion evidencing the existence of an arbitration…”
Buyer's First Realty, Inc. v. Cleveland Area Bd. of Realtors, 745 N.E.2d 1069 (Ohio Ct. App. 8th Dist. 2000). · cites it 3דBuyer’s First did not attach to the complaint copies of the CABOR rules that provide for arbitration of disputes, the arbitration agreement, the arbitration award, or the award confirmation as required by R.C. 2711.14. On December 29, 1997, Buyer’s First filed a second complaint…”
Citibank South Dakota, N.A. v. Wood, 169 Ohio App. 3d 269 (Ohio Ct. App. 2d Dist. 2006). · cites it 2ד*281 hi {¶ 36} In the seventh assignment of error, Wood claims that the trial court erroneously allowed Citibank to violate R.C. 2711.14, which requires parties to attach various documents to a motion to vacate, including the arbitration agreement, the award, and other documents…”
Woods v. Farmers Ins. of Columbus, Inc., 666 N.E.2d 283 (Ohio Ct. App. 10th Dist. 1995). · cites it 2ד” Rather, our decision on this point is based on the plain meaning of R.C. 2711.14, which states: “The judgment entered in [a proceeding for an order confirming, modifying, correcting, or vacating an award made in an' arbitration proceeding] shall be docketed as if rendered in…”
Cleveland Police Patrolmen's Ass'n v. City of Cleveland, 649 N.E.2d 1291 (Ohio Ct. App. 8th Dist. 1994). · cites it 3ד59319, unreported, 1991 WL 263713 , that compliance with R.C. 2711.14 mandates that a party file the pertinent papers in his motion to vacate an arbitrator’s award.”
Fraternal Order of Police v. City of Cincinnati, 860 N.E.2d 1073 (Ohio Ct. App. 1st Dist. 2006). · cites it 7דAs authority for this proposition, the city cites R.C. 2711.14, which states that any party applying to vacate an award in an arbitration hearing must file “[t]he agreement, the selection or appointment, if any, of an additional arbitrator or umpire, and each written extension…”
Citibank v. Wood, 894 N.E.2d 57 (Ohio Ct. App. 2d Dist. 2008). · cites it 3ד{¶ 9} We also noted, “In view of Citibank’s failure to present any evidence to the trial court, the court’s decision was clearly erroneous.”
Lockhart v. Am. Reserve Ins., 440 N.E.2d 1219 (Ohio Ct. App. 8th Dist. 1981). “13* (vacate); or R.C. 2711.14 (enforce the award). These special statutory sections provide the only procedures for post award attack or support of an arbitration decision.”
Sebold v. Latina Design Build Grp., L.L.C., 2021-Ohio-124, 166 N.E.3d 688. “Thereafter, the court of common pleas can, assuming the parties comply with the procedural requirements in R.C. 2711.14, enter a judgment confirming the award.”
Ohio Patrolmen's Benevolent Assn. v. Cleveland, 2024-Ohio-2651, 244 N.E.3d 1092. “{¶ 30} Nor is the deficiency with the union’s initial filing remedied by the union’s attaching to that filing the documents required for an application to vacate 14 January Term, 2024 an arbitration award under R.C. 2711.14. Under that statute’s text, a party asking for an order…”
City of Cincinnati v. Queen City Lodge No. 69, 842 N.E.2d 588 (Ohio Ct. App. 1st Dist. 2005). “In the trial court, the city did not challenge the conduct or regularity of the arbitration proceeding. Whether the arbitrator had exceeded her authority under the collective-bargaining agreement was an issue that was amply reviewable from the record of all exhibits filed and…”
Cleveland Police Patrolmen's Ass'n v. City of Cleveland, 649 N.E.2d 1291 (Ohio Ct. App. 8th Dist. 1994). “59319, unreported, 1991 WL 263713 , that compliance with R.C. 2711.14 mandates that a party file the pertinent papers in his motion to vacate an arbitrator’s award.”
NCO Portfolio Mgmt. Inc. v. McAfee, 843 N.E.2d 1259 (Ohio Ct. App. 9th Dist. 2005). “The issue was heard by a magistrate, who dismissed NCO’s claim due to its failure to file the accompanying arbitration agreement, as is required by R.C. 2711.14. NCO filed objections with the trial court, which overruled the objections and ordered the claim dismissed pursuant to…”
Fraternal Order of Police v. City of Cincinnati, 860 N.E.2d 1073 (Ohio Ct. App. 1st Dist. 2006). “As authority for this proposition, the city cites R.C. 2711.14, which states that any party applying to vacate an award in an arbitration hearing must file “[t]he agreement, the selection or appointment, if any, of an additional arbitrator or umpire, and each written extension…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.