Oklahoma Statutes

Okla. Stat. tit. 47, § 1110 (2026)

See the following versions:

✓ current as of July 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section OK-LEGoklegislature.gov JustiaOkla. Stat. CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

OS 47-1110v1 (HB 3618, Laws 2024, c. 323, § 1) OS 47-1110v2 (SB 527, Laws 2025, c. 403, § 1)

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 30 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1986–2022 · leading case: In Re Harper, 516 F.3d 1180 (10th Cir. 2008).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

In Re Harper, 516 F.3d 1180 (10th Cir. 2008). · cites it 7× “Okla. Stat. tit. 47, § 1110 (a)(1), (7); tit.”

Wheels, Inc. v. Otasco, Inc. (In Re Otasco, Inc.), 111 B.R. 976 (Bankr. N.D. Okla 1990). · cites it 5× “So far as appears from the record, no lien entry forms were ever delivered to the Oklahoma Tax Commission, pursuant to 47 O.S. § 1110, as to any of the vehicles herein.”

In Re Jernigan, 130 B.R. 879 (Bankr. N.D. Okla 1991). · cites it 2× “See 47 O.S. § 1110. It is undisputed ... that [Credit Union’s] lien was perfected on January 5, 1989.”

Bank of Oklahoma, N.A. v. Portis, 942 P.2d 249 (Okla. Civ. App. 1997). · cites it 2× “The trial court granted Portis’ motion for summary judgment, holding BOK violated the Oklahoma Uniform Consumer Credit Code (UCCC) by failing to properly notify Portis of the insurance charges.”

Malloy v. WilServ Credit Union, 516 F.3d 1180 (10th Cir. 2008). · cites it 7× “Okla. Stat. tit. 47, § 1110 (a)(1), (7); tit.”

Arvest Bank v. SpiritBank, N.A., 2008 OK CIV APP 55 (Okla. Civ. App. 2008). · cites it 2× “, 47 O.S.2001 § 1110(A). According to § 1110(A), delivery of a hen entry form to the Oklahoma Tax Commission or a motor license agent is required to perfect a security interest in a vehicle “[e]xcept for a security interest in vehicles held by a dealer,” and the fifing and…”

In Re Robinson, 285 B.R. 732 (Bankr. W.D. Okla. 2002). “Okla. Stat. Ann. tit. 47, § 1110 (West Supp.”

Beaumont v. Gen. Motors Acceptance Corp. (In Re Power), 133 B.R. 242 (Bankr. N.D. Okla 1991). · cites it 4× “GMAC perfected its security interest in the truck by filing the lien entry form with the Oklahoma Tax Commission on March 22, 1991, (“Day 15”) pursuant to 47 O.S. § 1110(A)(2). 1 On April 10, 1991, approximately three weeks after Day 15, the Debtor filed a Voluntary Chapter 7…”

Volvo Com. Fin. LLC the Americas v. McClellan, 2003 OK CIV APP 27 (Okla. Civ. App. 2002). “2001 § 1103, and that all vehicle liens must be recorded on such certificates, 47 O.S.2001 § 1110, we similarly hold that potential purchasers and lenders must be able to rely on Oklahoma certificates of title to determine whether a vehicle is subject to an encumbrance.”

McKinney v. State, 819 P.2d 722 (Okla. Civ. App. 1991). · cites it 2× “However, 47 O.S.Supp.1989 § 1110 provides for “perfection” of a security interest in a motor vehicle.”

Wheels, Inc. v. Otasco, Inc. (In Re Otasco, Inc.), 196 B.R. 554 (N.D. Okla. 1991). “No lien entry forms pursuant to 47 O.S. § 1110 were ever delivered to the Oklahoma Tax Commission as to any of the vehicles.”

Tinker Fed. Credit Union v. Liticker, 2023 OK CIV APP 6 (Okla. Civ. App. 2022). · cites it 2× “Liticker maintains "[t]he trial court erred in finding TFCU did not convert [his] property," and argues the trial court erred in finding TFCU was not required to release the lien within seven days on Collateral 2 after the last payment was made on November 5, 2012, in violation…”

Show all 30 citing cases →

— Okla. Stat. tit. 47, § 1110(A) — 2 cases

Arvest Bank v. SpiritBank, N.A., 2008 OK CIV APP 55 (Okla. Civ. App. 2008). “, 47 O.S.2001 § 1110(A). According to § 1110(A), delivery of a hen entry form to the Oklahoma Tax Commission or a motor license agent is required to perfect a security interest in a vehicle “[e]xcept for a security interest in vehicles held by a dealer,” and the fifing and…”

In re De Los Angeles, 101 B.R. 722 (Bankr. E.D. Okla. 1989).

— Okla. Stat. tit. 47, § 1110(A)(1) — 5 cases

Wheels, Inc. v. Otasco, Inc. (In Re Otasco, Inc.), 111 B.R. 976 (Bankr. N.D. Okla 1990). “So far as appears from the record, no lien entry forms were ever delivered to the Oklahoma Tax Commission, pursuant to 47 O.S. § 1110, as to any of the vehicles herein.”

Kirtley v. Gen. Motors Acceptance Corp. (In Re Thummel), 109 B.R. 447 (Bankr. N.D. Okla 1989).

Manchester v. Green Tree Fin. Servicing Corp., 97 P.3d 639 (Okla. 2004).

In Re Gregory, 2004 OK 57 (Okla. 2001).

Malloy v. WilServ Credit Union, 383 F.3d 1180 (10th Cir. 2008).

— Okla. Stat. tit. 47, § 1110(A)(2) — 3 cases

In Re Jernigan, 130 B.R. 879 (Bankr. N.D. Okla 1991). “See 47 O.S. § 1110. It is undisputed ... that [Credit Union’s] lien was perfected on January 5, 1989.”

Beaumont v. Gen. Motors Acceptance Corp. (In Re Power), 133 B.R. 242 (Bankr. N.D. Okla 1991). “GMAC perfected its security interest in the truck by filing the lien entry form with the Oklahoma Tax Commission on March 22, 1991, (“Day 15”) pursuant to 47 O.S. § 1110(A)(2). 1 On April 10, 1991, approximately three weeks after Day 15, the Debtor filed a Voluntary Chapter 7…”

Spears v. Oklahoma High. Credit Union (In re Barragree), 159 B.R. 43 (W.D. Okla. 1993).

— Okla. Stat. tit. 47, § 1110(A)(5) — 1 case

— Okla. Stat. tit. 47, § 1110(B)(1) — 2 cases

Bank of Oklahoma, N.A. v. Portis, 942 P.2d 249 (Okla. Civ. App. 1997). “The trial court granted Portis’ motion for summary judgment, holding BOK violated the Oklahoma Uniform Consumer Credit Code (UCCC) by failing to properly notify Portis of the insurance charges.”

Tinker Fed. Credit Union v. Liticker, 2023 OK CIV APP 6 (Okla. Civ. App. 2022).

— Okla. Stat. tit. 47, § 1110(C) — 2 cases

Manchester v. Green Tree Fin. Servicing Corp., 97 P.3d 639 (Okla. 2004).

In Re Gregory, 2004 OK 57 (Okla. 2001).

— Okla. Stat. tit. 47, § 1110(G) — 3 cases

In Re Harper, 516 F.3d 1180 (10th Cir. 2008). “Okla. Stat. tit. 47, § 1110 (a)(1), (7); tit.”

Malloy v. WilServ Credit Union, 516 F.3d 1180 (10th Cir. 2008). “Okla. Stat. tit. 47, § 1110 (a)(1), (7); tit.”

Malloy v. WilServ Credit Union, 383 F.3d 1180 (10th Cir. 2008).

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.