Sec. 410.255. JUDICIAL REVIEW OF ISSUES OTHER THAN COMPENSABILITY OR INCOME OR DEATH BENEFITS. (a) For all issues other than those covered under Section 410.301(a), judicial review shall be conducted in the manner provided for judicial review of a contested case under Subchapter G, Chapter 2001, Government Code.
(b) Judicial review conducted under this section is governed by the substantial evidence rule.
Acts 1993, 73rd Leg., ch. 269, Sec. 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1993. Amended by Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch. 76, Sec. 5.95(53), eff. Sept. 1, 1995.
Notes of Decisions
Cont'l Cas. Ins. Co. v. Functional Restoration Assocs., 19 S.W.3d 393 (Tex. 2000).
· cites it 8× “" In support of its claim, Continental's petition states that the Commission's: findings, inferences, and conclusions, and decisions are unlawful and improper because of one or more of the following: 1.”
Texas Workers' Comp. Comm'n v. Garcia, 893 S.W.2d 504 (Tex. 1995).
· cites it 2× “[27] Tex.Lab.Code § 410.255. Although plaintiffs argue in conclusory fashion that this procedure also violates the right to jury trial, none of the parties have briefed this specific issue.”
Texas Prop. & Cas. Guar. Ass'n v. Nat'l Am. Ins. Co., 208 S.W.3d 523 (Tex. App.—Austin 2006).
· cites it 3× “First, observing that NAIC initially filed its judicial review suit in McLennan County, TPCIGA argues that the Travis County district court had exclusive subject-matter jurisdiction to entertain NAIC’s suit, see Tex. Lab.Code Ann. § 410.255; Tex. Gov’t Code Ann.”
In re Pepsico, Inc., 87 S.W.3d 787 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 2002).
“2002) *790 as not permitting the use of mandamus to enforce the mandatory venue provision of Tex. Lab.Code Ann. § 410.255(a) (Vernon 1996).”
Tex. Lab. Code § 410.255(a): 10 cases
Cont'l Cas. Ins. Co. v. Functional Restoration Assocs., 19 S.W.3d 393 (Tex. 2000).
“" In support of its claim, Continental's petition states that the Commission's: findings, inferences, and conclusions, and decisions are unlawful and improper because of one or more of the following: 1.”
In re Pepsico, Inc., 87 S.W.3d 787 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 2002).
“2002) *790 as not permitting the use of mandamus to enforce the mandatory venue provision of Tex. Lab.Code Ann. § 410.255(a) (Vernon 1996).”
Tex. Lab. Code § 410.255(b): 5 cases
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.