Texas Codes

Tex. Lab. Code § 410.255 (2026)

Judicial Review Of Issues Other Than Compensability Or Income Or Death Benefits

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section TX-LEGstatutes.capitol.texas.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Sec. 410.255. JUDICIAL REVIEW OF ISSUES OTHER THAN COMPENSABILITY OR INCOME OR DEATH BENEFITS. (a) For all issues other than those covered under Section 410.301(a), judicial review shall be conducted in the manner provided for judicial review of a contested case under Subchapter G, Chapter 2001, Government Code.

(b) Judicial review conducted under this section is governed by the substantial evidence rule.

Acts 1993, 73rd Leg., ch. 269, Sec. 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1993. Amended by Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch. 76, Sec. 5.95(53), eff. Sept. 1, 1995.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 58 cases (4 in the last 5 years), 1995–2025 · leading case: Cont'l Cas. Ins. Co. v. Functional Restoration Assocs., 19 S.W.3d 393 (Tex. 2000).
Cont'l Cas. Ins. Co. v. Functional Restoration Assocs., 19 S.W.3d 393 (Tex. 2000). · cites it 8× “" In support of its claim, Continental's petition states that the Commission's: findings, inferences, and conclusions, and decisions are unlawful and improper because of one or more of the following: 1.”
Rodriguez v. Serv. Lloyds Ins. Co., 997 S.W.2d 248 (Tex. 1999). · cites it 4× “See TEX. LAB.CODE §§ 410.255, 410.301; Garcia, 893 S.”
Texas Workers' Comp. Comm'n v. Garcia, 893 S.W.2d 504 (Tex. 1995). · cites it 2× “[27] Tex.Lab.Code § 410.255. Although plaintiffs argue in conclusory fashion that this procedure also violates the right to jury trial, none of the parties have briefed this specific issue.”
Texas Prop. & Cas. Guar. Ass'n v. Nat'l Am. Ins. Co., 208 S.W.3d 523 (Tex. App. 2006). · cites it 3× “First, observing that NAIC initially filed its judicial review suit in McLennan County, TPCIGA argues that the Travis County district court had exclusive subject-matter jurisdiction to entertain NAIC’s suit, see Tex. Lab.Code Ann. § 410.255; Tex. Gov’t Code Ann.”
Morales v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., 241 S.W.3d 514 (Tex. 2007). · cites it 2× “Tex. Lab.Code § 410.255(a); Tex. Gov’t Code § 2001.”
Morales v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., 169 S.W.3d 485 (Tex. App. 2005). · cites it 2× “See Tex. Lab.Code Ann. §§ 410.255, 410.301; Rodriguez, 997 S.”
Robert Croysdill v. Old Repub. Ins. Co., 490 S.W.3d 287 (Tex. App. 2016). · cites it 2× “Tex. Lab. Code Ann. § 410.255 (b); see Texas Prop.”
Hartford Ins. Co. v. Crain, 246 S.W.3d 374 (Tex. App. 2008). · cites it 2× “” Tex. Lab.Code Ann. § 410.255 (West 2006).”
Cervantes v. Tyson Foods, Inc., 130 S.W.3d 152 (Tex. App. 2004). “See Tex.Lab.Code Ann. § 410.255; see also Tex.”
Holmans v. Transource Polymers, Inc., 914 S.W.2d 189 (Tex. App. 1996). “Tex.Labor Code Ann. § 410.255 (Vernon Pamph.”
Texas Workers' Comp. Ins. Fund v. Texas Workers' Comp. Comm'n, 124 S.W.3d 813 (Tex. App. 2003). “176(b)(1) (West 2000); Tex. Lab.Code Ann. § 410.255 (West 1996).”
In Re Pepsico, Inc., 87 S.W.3d 787 (Tex. App. 2002). “2002) *790 as not permitting the use of mandamus to enforce the mandatory venue provision of Tex. Lab.Code Ann. § 410.255(a) (Vernon 1996).”
— Tex. Lab. Code § 410.255(a) — 10 cases
Cont'l Cas. Ins. Co. v. Functional Restoration Assocs., 19 S.W.3d 393 (Tex. 2000). “" In support of its claim, Continental's petition states that the Commission's: findings, inferences, and conclusions, and decisions are unlawful and improper because of one or more of the following: 1.”
Morales v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., 241 S.W.3d 514 (Tex. 2007). “Tex. Lab.Code § 410.255(a); Tex. Gov’t Code § 2001.”
In Re Pepsico, Inc., 87 S.W.3d 787 (Tex. App. 2002). “2002) *790 as not permitting the use of mandamus to enforce the mandatory venue provision of Tex. Lab.Code Ann. § 410.255(a) (Vernon 1996).”
State Off. of Risk Mgmt. v. Herrera, 288 S.W.3d 543 (Tex. App. 2009).
State Off. of Risk Mgmt. v. Herrera, 189 S.W.3d 405 (Tex. App. 2006).
— Tex. Lab. Code § 410.255(b) — 5 cases
Sec. Nat'l Ins. Co. v. Farmer, 89 S.W.3d 197 (Tex. App. 2002).
Facility Ins. Corp. v. Patients Med. Ctr., 574 S.W.3d 436 (Tex. App. 2018).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.