Texas Codes

Tex. Lab. Code § 410.301 (2026)

Judicial Review Of Issues Regarding Compensability Or Income Or Death Benefits

✓ laws through the 89th Legislature (2025)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section TX-LEGstatutes.capitol.texas.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Sec. 410.301. JUDICIAL REVIEW OF ISSUES REGARDING COMPENSABILITY OR INCOME OR DEATH BENEFITS. (a) Judicial review of a final decision of the appeals panel regarding compensability or eligibility for or the amount of income or death benefits shall be conducted as provided by this subchapter.

(b) A determination of benefits before a court shall be in accordance with this subtitle.

Acts 1993, 73rd Leg., ch. 269, Sec. 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1993.

Amended by:

Acts 2005, 79th Leg., Ch. 265 (H.B. 7), Sec. 3.203, eff. September 1, 2005.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 83 cases (4 in the last 5 years), 1995–2025 · leading case: Cont'l Cas. Ins. Co. v. Functional Restoration Assocs., 19 S.W.3d 393 (Tex. 2000).
Cont'l Cas. Ins. Co. v. Functional Restoration Assocs., 19 S.W.3d 393 (Tex. 2000). · cites it 4× “Compare TEX. LAB.CODE § 410.301(a) ("Judicial review of a final decision of a commission appeals panel regarding compensability or eligibility for or the amount of income or death benefits shall be conducted as provided by this subchapter.”
Albertson's, Inc. v. Sinclair, 984 S.W.2d 958 (Tex. 1999). · cites it 3× “” Tex. Lab.Code § 410.301; see also Lumbermens Mut.”
Texas Workers' Comp. Comm'n v. Garcia, 893 S.W.2d 504 (Tex. 1995). · cites it 2× “See Tex.Lab.Code § 410.301. The question presented, therefore, is whether the Legislature has so restricted the jury's role in deciding these issues that it has transgressed the inviolate right to jury trial.”
Texas Prop. & Cas. Guar. Ass'n v. Nat'l Am. Ins. Co., 208 S.W.3d 523 (Tex. App.—Austin 2006). · cites it 3× “However, after a jury trial under the “modified de novo ” standard applicable to disputes relating to compensability, eligibility, or amount of income benefits, see Tex. Lab.Code Ann. § 410.301 (West Supp.2005), the district court rendered judgment on a verdict that Hunter was…”
Rodriguez v. Serv. Lloyds Ins. Co., 997 S.W.2d 248 (Tex. 1999). · cites it 2× “See TEX. LAB.CODE § 410.301; see also Garcia, 893 S.”
Am. Zurich Ins. Co. v. Samudio, 317 S.W.3d 336 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2010). · cites it 4× “A dispute regarding the extent of impairment suffered by Samudio goes directly to the issue of Samudio’s eligibility for income benefits.”
Cervantes v. Tyson Foods, Inc., 130 S.W.3d 152 (Tex. App.—El Paso 2004). · cites it 2× “Under Texas Labor Code Section 410.301, judicial review of a final decision of the commission appeals panel regarding compensa-bility or eligibility for or the amount of income or death benefits shall be conducted as provided by this subchapter.”
Morales v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., 241 S.W.3d 514 (Tex. 2007). ““Benefit” is defined as “a medical benefit, an income benefit, a death benefit, or a burial benefit based on com-pensable injury.”
Texas Dep't of Ins. v. De Los Santos, 446 S.W.3d 800 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2014). · cites it 4× “See TEX. LAB. CODE ANN. § 410.301 (West 2006) (permitting judicial review of issues regarding income benefits).”
Robert Croysdill v. Old Repub. Ins. Co., 490 S.W.3d 287 (Tex. App.—El Paso 2016). · cites it 2× “See Tex. Lab. Code Ann. § 410.301 (West 2015).”
Hartford Ins. Co. v. Crain, 246 S.W.3d 374 (Tex. App.—Austin 2008). · cites it 2× “Issues regarding com-pensability or income or death benefits are to be reviewed using a modified de novo standard, Tex. Lab.Code Ann. § 410.301, while all other issues are reviewed using the substantial evidence rule, Tex.”
Harris Cnty. Emergency Servs. Dist. 1 v. Miller, 122 S.W.3d 218 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2003). · cites it 2× “" Tex. Lab.Code Ann. § 410.301(a) (Vernon 1996); see Albertson's, Inc.”
Tex. Lab. Code § 410.301(a): 21 cases
Cont'l Cas. Ins. Co. v. Functional Restoration Assocs., 19 S.W.3d 393 (Tex. 2000). “Compare TEX. LAB.CODE § 410.301(a) ("Judicial review of a final decision of a commission appeals panel regarding compensability or eligibility for or the amount of income or death benefits shall be conducted as provided by this subchapter.”
Am. Zurich Ins. Co. v. Samudio, 317 S.W.3d 336 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2010). “A dispute regarding the extent of impairment suffered by Samudio goes directly to the issue of Samudio’s eligibility for income benefits.”
Morales v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., 241 S.W.3d 514 (Tex. 2007). ““Benefit” is defined as “a medical benefit, an income benefit, a death benefit, or a burial benefit based on com-pensable injury.”
Harris Cnty. Emergency Servs. Dist. 1 v. Miller, 122 S.W.3d 218 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2003). “" Tex. Lab.Code Ann. § 410.301(a) (Vernon 1996); see Albertson's, Inc.”
City of Laredo v. Garza, 293 S.W.3d 625 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2009).
Tex. Lab. Code § 410.301(a)(b): 1 case
Beaumont Indep. Sch. Dist. v. Parkerson, 105 S.W.3d 761 (Tex. App.—Beaumont 2003).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.