18 U.S.C. § 1026

Compromise, adjustment, or cancellation of farm indebtedness

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 18 CasesGoogle Scholar

Whoever knowingly makes any false statement for the purpose of influencing in any way the action of the Secretary of Agriculture, or of any person acting under his authority, in connection with any compromise, adjustment, or cancellation of any farm indebtedness as provided by sections 1150, 1150a, and 1150b of Title 12, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 4 cases, 1994–2010 · leading case: United States v. Wells, 519 U.S. 482 (1997).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

United States v. Wells, 519 U.S. 482 (1997). · cites it 2× “§ 1020 (penalizing false statement regarding highway projects); 18 U. S. C. § 1026 (penalizing false statement regarding farm indebtedness for purpose of influencing Secretary of Agriculture); 18 U.”

United States v. Alvarez, 617 F.3d 1198 (9th Cir. 2010). · cites it 2× “naturalization, citizenship, or registry of aliens"); 18 U.S.C. § 1026 (punishing "any false statement for the purpose of influencing in any way the action of the Secretary of Agriculture .”

United States v. Michael E. Gaudin, 28 F.3d 943 (9th Cir. 1994). “§ 1020 (penalizing false statement regarding highway projects); 18 U.S.C. § 1026 (penalizing false statement regarding farm indebtedness for purpose of influencing Secretary of Agriculture); 18 U.”

United States v. Feaster, 43 F. App'x 628 (4th Cir. 2002). “§ 1341 , possession of false documents in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1026 (a)(6), and money laundering in violation of 18 U.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.