30 U.S.C. § 922

Payment of benefits

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 30 CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) SchedulesSubject to the provisions of subsection (b) of this section, benefit payments shall be made by the Secretary under this part as follows:(1) In the case of total disability of a miner due to pneumoconiosis, the disabled miner shall be paid benefits during the disability at a rate equal to 37½ per centum of the monthly pay rate for Federal employees in grade GS–2, step 1.(2) In the case of death of a miner due to pneumoconiosis or, except with respect to a claim filed under part C of this subchapter on or after the effective date of the Black Lung Benefits Amendments of 1981, of a miner receiving benefits under this part, benefits shall be paid to his widow (if any) at the rate the deceased miner would receive such benefits if he were totally disabled.(3) In the case of the child or children of a miner whose death is due to pneumoconiosis or, except with respect to a claim filed under part C of this subchapter on or after the effective date of the Black Lung Benefits Amendments of 1981, of a miner who is receiving benefits under this part at the time of his death or who was totally disabled by pneumoconiosis at the time of his death, in the case of the child or children of a widow who is receiving benefits under this part at the time of her death, and in the case of any child or children entitled to the payment of benefits under paragraph (5) of section 921(c) of this title, benefits shall be paid to such child or children as follows: If there is one such child, he shall be paid benefits at the rate specified in paragraph (1). If there is more than one such child, the benefits paid shall be divided equally among them and shall be paid at a rate equal to the rate specified in paragraph (1), increased by 50 per centum of such rate if there are two such children, by 75 per centum of such rate if there are three such children, and by 100 per centum of such rate if there are more than three such children: Provided, That benefits shall only be paid to a child for so long as he meets the criteria for the term “child” contained in section 902(g) of this title: And provided further, That no entitlement to benefits as a child shall be established under this paragraph (3) for any month for which entitlement to benefits as a widow is established under paragraph (2).(4) In the case of an individual entitled to benefit payments under clause (1) or (2) of this subsection who has one or more dependents, the benefit payments shall be increased at the rate of 50 per centum of such benefit payments, if such individual has one dependent, 75 per centum if such individual has two dependents, and 100 per centum if such individual has three or more dependents.(5) In the case of the dependent parent or parents of a miner whose death is due to pneumoconiosis, or, except with respect to a claim filed under part C of this subchapter on or after the effective date of the Black Lung Benefits Amendments of 1981, of a miner who is receiving benefits under this part at the time of his death or who was totally disabled by pneumoconiosis at the time of death, and who is not survived at the time of his death by a widow or a child, in the case of the dependent surviving brother(s) or sister(s) of such a miner who is not survived at the time of his death by a widow, child, or parent, in the case of the dependent parent or parents of a miner (who is not survived at the time of his or her death by a widow or a child) who are entitled to the payment of benefits under paragraph (5) of section 921(c) of this title, or in the case of the dependent surviving brother(s) or sister(s) of a miner (who is not survived at the time of his or her death by a widow, child, or parent) who are entitled to the payment of benefits under paragraph (5) of section 921(c) of this title, benefits shall be paid under this part to such parent(s), or to such brother(s), or sister(s), at the rate specified in paragraph (3) (as if such parent(s) or such brother(s) or sister(s), were the children of such miner). In determining for purposes of this paragraph whether a claimant bears the relationship as the miner’s parent, brother, or sister, the Secretary shall apply legal standards consistent with those applicable to relationship determination under title II of the Social Security Act [42 U.S.C. 401 et seq.]. No benefits to a sister or brother shall be payable under this paragraph for any month beginning with the month in which he or she receives support from his or her spouse, or marries. Benefits shall be payable under this paragraph to a brother only if he is—(1)(A) under eighteen years of age, or(B) under a disability as defined in section 223(d) of the Social Security Act [42 U.S.C. 423(d)] which began before the age specified in section 202(d)(1)(B)(ii) of such Act [42 U.S.C. 402(d)(1)(B)(ii)], or in the case of a student, before he ceased to be a student, or(C) a student as defined in section 902(g) of this title; or(2) who is, at the time of the miner’s death, disabled as determined in accordance with section 223(d) of the Social Security Act [42 U.S.C. 423(d)], during such disability. Any benefit under this paragraph for a month prior to the month in which a claim for such benefit is filed shall be reduced to any extent that may be necessary, so that it will not render erroneous any benefit which, before the filing of such claim, the Secretary has certified for payment for such prior months. As used in this paragraph, “dependent” means that during the one year period prior to and ending with such miner’s death, such parent, brother, or sister was living in the miner’s household, and was, during such period, totally dependent on the miner for support. Proof of such support shall be filed by such claimant within two years after May 1972, or within two years after the miner’s death, whichever is the later. Any such proof which is filed after the expiration of such period shall be deemed to have been filed within such period if it is shown to the satisfaction of the Secretary that there was good cause for failure to file such proof within such period. The determination of what constitutes “living in the miner’s household”, “totally dependent upon the miner for support,” and “good cause,” shall for purposes of this paragraph be made in accordance with regulations of the Secretary. Benefit payments under this paragraph to a parent, brother, or sister, shall be reduced by the amount by which such payments would be reduced on account of excess earnings of such parent, brother, or sister, respectively, under section 203(b)–(l) of the Social Security Act [42 U.S.C. 403(b)–(l)], as if the benefit under this paragraph were a benefit under section 202 of such Act [42 U.S.C. 402].(6) If an individual’s benefits would be increased under paragraph (4) of this subsection because he or she has one or more dependents, and it appears to the Secretary that it would be in the interest of any such dependent to have the amount of such increase in benefits (to the extent attributable to such dependent) certified to a person other than such individual, then the Secretary may, under regulations prescribed by him, certify the amount of such increase in benefits (to the extent so attributable) not to such individual but directly to such dependent or to another person for the use and benefit of such dependent; and any payment made under this clause, if otherwise valid under this subchapter, shall be a complete settlement and satisfaction of all claims, rights, and interests in and to such payment.(b) Reduction of benefits

Notwithstanding subsection (a), benefit payments under this section to a miner or his widow, child, parent, brother, or sister shall be reduced, on a monthly or other appropriate basis, by an amount equal to any payment received by such miner or his widow, child, parent, brother, or sister under the workmen’s compensation, unemployment compensation, or disability insurance laws of his State on account of the disability of such miner due to pneumoconiosis, and the amount by which such payment would be reduced on account of excess earnings of such miner under section 203(b) through (l) of the Social Security Act [42 U.S.C. 403(b) to (l)] if the amount paid were a benefit payable under section 202 of such Act [42 U.S.C. 402]. This part shall not be considered a workmen’s compensation law or plan for purposes of section 224 of such Act [42 U.S.C. 424a].

Benefits payable under this part shall be deemed not to be income for purposes of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.

(Pub. L. 91–173, title IV, § 412, Dec. 30, 1969, 83 Stat. 794; Pub. L. 92–303, §§ 1(b)(1), (2), (c)(1), 2(a), May 19, 1972, 86 Stat. 150, 151, 153; Pub. L. 95–239, §§ 3(b)(1), 4, Mar. 1, 1978, 92 Stat. 96, 97; Pub. L. 97–119, title II, § 203(a)(1)–(3), (d), Dec. 29, 1981, 95 Stat. 1643, 1644; Pub. L. 99–514, § 2, Oct. 22, 1986, 100 Stat. 2095; Pub. L. 103–296, title I, § 108(i)(2), Aug. 15, 1994, 108 Stat. 1488; Pub. L. 107–275, § 2(a), Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1925.)Editorial NotesReferences in Text

Grade GS–2, referred to in subsec. (a)(1), is contained in the General Schedule which is set out under section 5332 of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.

The effective date of the Black Lung Benefits Amendments of 1981, referred to in subsec. (a)(2), (3), and (5), is Jan. 1, 1982, except as otherwise provided. See section 206(a) of Pub. L. 97–119, set out as an Effective Date of 1981 Amendment note under section 901 of this title.

The Social Security Act, referred to in subsec. (a)(5), is act Aug. 14, 1935, ch. 531, 49 Stat. 620. Title II of that Act is classified generally to subchapter II (§ 401 et seq.) of chapter 7 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 1305 of Title 42 and Tables.

The Internal Revenue Code of 1986, referred to in subsec. (c), is classified to Title 26, Internal Revenue Code.

Amendments

2002—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 107–275 substituted “Secretary” for “Commissioner of Social Security” wherever appearing.

1994—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 103–296 substituted “Commissioner of Social Security” for “Secretary” wherever appearing.

1986—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 99–514 substituted “Internal Revenue Code of 1986” for “Internal Revenue Code of 1954”.

1981—Subsec. (a)(1). Pub. L. 97–119, § 203(d), substituted “37½ per centum of the monthly pay rate for Federal employees in grade GS–2, step 1” for “50 per centum of the minimum monthly payment to which a Federal employee in grade GS–2, who is totally disabled, is entitled at the time of payment under chapter 81 of title 5”.

Subsec. (a)(2). Pub. L. 97–119, § 203(a)(1), inserted “, except with respect to a claim filed under part C of this subchapter on or after the effective date of the Black Lung Amendments of 1981,” after “pneumoconiosis or”.

Subsec. (a)(3). Pub. L. 97–119, § 203(a)(2), inserted “, except with respect to a claim filed under part C of this subchapter on or after the effective date of the Black Lung Benefits Amendments of 1981,” after “pneumoconiosis or” and substituted “time of his death or” for “time of his death, or”.

Subsec. (a)(5). Pub. L. 97–119, § 203(a)(3), inserted “, except with respect to a claim filed under part C of this subchapter on or after the effective date of the Black Lung Benefits Amendments of 1981,” after “pneumoconiosis, or” and substituted “time of his death or who was totally” for “time of his death, or of a miner who was totally”.

1978—Subsec. (a)(3). Pub. L. 95–239, § 3(b)(1)(A), inserted reference to any child or children entitled to the payment of benefits under paragraph (5) of section 921(c) of this title.

Subsec. (a)(5). Pub. L. 95–239, § 3(b)(1)(B), inserted references to the payment of benefits under par. (5) of section 921(c) of this title.

Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 95–239, § 4, substituted “on account of the disability of such miner due to pneumoconiosis” for “on account of the disability of such miner”.

1972—Subsec. (a)(3), (4). Pub. L. 92–303, § 1(b)(1), added par. (3) and redesignated former par. (3) as par. (4).

Subsec. (a)(5), (6). Pub. L. 92–303, § 1(b)(2), added pars. (5) and (6).

Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 92–303, §§ 1(c)(1), 2(a), substituted “widow, child, parent, brother, or sister” for “widow” wherever appearing, and inserted provision that this part would not be considered as a workmen’s compensation law or plan for purposes of section 224 of such Act.

Statutory Notes and Related SubsidiariesEffective Date of 2002 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 107–275 effective 90 days after Nov. 2, 2002, see section 4 of Pub. L. 107–275, set out as a note under section 902 of this title.

Effective Date of 1994 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 103–296 effective Mar. 31, 1995, see section 110(a) of Pub. L. 103–296, set out as a note under section 401 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare.

Effective Date of 1981 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 97–119 effective Jan. 1, 1982, except as otherwise provided, see section 206(a) of Pub. L. 97–119, set out as a note under section 901 of this title.

Effective Date of 1978 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 95–239 effective Mar. 1, 1978, see section 20(a) of Pub. L. 95–239, set out as a note under section 901 of this title.

Effective Date of 1972 Amendment

Pub. L. 92–303, § 2(b), May 19, 1972, 86 Stat. 153, provided that: “The amendment made by this section [amending this section] shall be effective as of December 30, 1969.”

Calculation of Monthly Benefit Payments

Pub. L. 103–333, title V, § 512, Sept. 30, 1994, 108 Stat. 2573, provided that: “Notwithstanding any other provision of law, monthly benefit rates during fiscal year 1995 and thereafter under part B or part C of the Black Lung Benefits Act [30 U.S.C. 921 et seq., 931 et seq.] shall continue to be based on the benefit rates in effect in September, 1994 and be paid in accordance with the Act, until exceeded by the benefit rate specified in section 412(a)(1) of the Act [30 U.S.C. 922(a)(1)].”

Pub. L. 103–112, title V, § 508(a), Oct. 21, 1993, 107 Stat. 1113, provided that: “Notwithstanding any other provision of law, monthly benefit payments under part B or part C of the Black Lung Benefits Act [30 U.S.C. 921 et seq., 931 et seq.] for months after December 1993 and before October 1994 shall be calculated as though the provisions of Federal law prescribing pay rates for Federal employees continued in effect, without amendment to or limitation of such provisions, after January 1993.”

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 68 cases (5 in the last 5 years), 1973–2026 · leading case: Usery v. Turner Elkhorn Mining Co., 428 U.S. 1 (1976).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Usery v. Turner Elkhorn Mining Co., 428 U.S. 1 (1976). · cites it 8× “§§ 422 (c), (d); see § 412 (a), 30 U. S. C. § 922 (a) (1970 ed. and Supp.”

B & G Constr. Co. v. Dir., Off. of Workers' Comp. Programs, 662 F.3d 233 (3rd Cir. 2011). · cites it 8× “1643 (codified at 30 U.S.C. §§ 922 , 923 (West 1982)) (collectively "the 1981 amendments").”

Piney Mountain Coal Co. v. Mays, 176 F.3d 753 (4th Cir. 1999). · cites it 4× “Piney Mountain asserts that the total benefits that may be paid to his survivors is limited in the same way: inasmuch as there are two eligible beneficiaries, its total liability should equal one basic benefit plus 50 percent.”

U.S. Steel Mining Co., LLC v. Dir., OWCP, 719 F.3d 1275 (11th Cir. 2013). · cites it 4× “at 794 (codified as amended at 30 U.S.C. § 922 (a)(2)). The legislation provided that the federal government would pay the benefits until 1973,.”

Westmoreland Coal Co. v. Sharpe Ex Rel. Sharpe, 692 F.3d 317 (4th Cir. 2012). · cites it 4× “See 30 U.S.C. § 922 (a)(1) (providing that, "[i]n the case of total dis- ability of a miner due to pneumoconiosis, the disabled miner shall be paid benefits").”

Sharpe v. Dir., Off. of Workers' Comp. Programs, 495 F.3d 125 (4th Cir. 2007). · cites it 2× “See 30 U.S.C. § 922 (a)(1). . The 1993 ALJ Decision awarded Mr.”

West Virginia Cwp Fund v. Elsie Stacy, 671 F.3d 378 (4th Cir. 2011). · cites it 2× “For one thing, the 1981 amendments added limiting language to 30 U.S.C. §§ 922 (a)(2) and 932(Z) that effectively abolished automatic survivors’ benefits going forward.”

Robert E. McCOWN (85-5471), Willie Robinson (85-5472), Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Sec'y OF HEALTH & HUMAN Servs., Defendant-Appellee, 796 F.2d 151 (6th Cir. 1986). · cites it 5× “Upon reconsideration, the SSA waived all overpayments but reaffirmed the offset imposed by § 424a because black lung benefits paid pursuant to Part C of the Act were interpreted by the Secretary to be workers’ compensation payments which precluded invoking the offset prohibition…”

Union Carbide Corp. v. Virginia Richards, 721 F.3d 307 (4th Cir. 2013). “See 30 U.S.C. § 922 (a)(2) (1970). This automatic “derivative benefits” scheme was reinforced in the 1978 amendments to the BLBA, which enacted 30 U.”

Albert W. Freeman v. Patricia Roberts Harris, Sec'y of Health & Human Servs., Defendant, 625 F.2d 1303 (5th Cir. 1980). · cites it 3× “30 U.S.C. § 922 (b) (1976). Thus, Congress did away with a provision which had an ultimate effect (decreased benefits) similar to the double offset being considered today and which had the effect of constructing a ceiling on federal benefits of 80% of the worker’s pre-disability…”

Marmon Coal Co. v. Dir., Off. of Workers' Comp. Programs, 726 F.3d 387 (3rd Cir. 2013). “2 See 30 U.S.C. § 922 (a)(2) (1970). In 1981, due to a soaring increase in the number of claims for benefits under the BLBA, Congress prospectively eliminated the automatic entitlement to benefits for surviving dependents.”

Jackie McBrayer v. Sec'y of Health & Human Servs., 712 F.2d 795 (2d Cir. 1983). “See 30 U.S.C. § 922 (a)(3) (Supp. Y 1981). Section 922(a)(3) refers to the definition of “child” contained in section 902(g).”

Show all 68 citing cases →

— 30 U.S.C. § 922(a)(1) — 1 case

Markosky v. Mathews, 435 F. Supp. 374 (E.D. Pa. 1977).

— 30 U.S.C. § 922(a)(2) — 1 case

Jim Walter Resources, Inc. v. Dir., Off. of Worker's Comp. Programs, 766 F.3d 1333 (11th Cir. 2014).

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.