33 U.S.C. § 990

Offenses and penalties

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 33 CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Application of penal statutes

All general penal statutes relating to the larceny, embezzlement, or conversion, of public moneys or property of the United States shall apply to the moneys and property of the Corporation.

(b) Frauds and false entries, reports, or statements

Any person who, with intent to defraud the Corporation, or to deceive any director, officer, or employee of the Corporation or any officer or employee of the United States, (1) makes any false entry in any book of the Corporation, or (2) makes any false report or statement for the Corporation, shall, upon conviction thereof, be fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.

Any person who shall receive any compensation, rebate, or reward, or shall enter into any conspiracy, collusion, or agreement, express or implied, with intent to defraud the Corporation or wrongfully and unlawfully to defeat its purposes, shall, on conviction thereof, be fined not more than $5,000 or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.

(May 13, 1954, ch. 201, § 9, 68 Stat. 96.)

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 3 cases, 1974–1997 · leading case: United States v. Wells, 519 U.S. 482 (1997).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

United States v. Wells, 519 U.S. 482 (1997). · cites it 2× “§ 931 (penalizing false statement for purpose of obtaining workers' compensation benefit); 33 U. S. C. § 990 (b) (penalizing false statement to corporation governing Saint Lawrence Seaway); 33 U.”

United States v. Michael E. Gaudin, 28 F.3d 943 (9th Cir. 1994). “§ 931 (penalizing false statement for purpose of obtaining workers’ compensation benefit); 33 U.S.C. § 990 (b) (penalizing false statement to corporation governing Saint Lawrence Seaway); 33 U.”

Breitbeck v. United States, 205 Ct. Cl. 208 (Ct. Cl. 1974). “” 33 U.S.C. § 990 (a). The functions of the Corporation ( 33 U.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.