42 U.S.C. § 15511

Transferred

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 42 CasesGoogle Scholar

[transferred]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 11 cases, 2006–2013 · leading case: Marks v. Gessler, 350 P.3d 883 (Colo. Ct. App. 2013).
Marks v. Gessler, 350 P.3d 883 (Colo. Ct. App. 2013). · cites it 2× “They cite 42 U.S.C. §15511 (2006), which provides: ' The Attorney General may bring a civil action against any State or jurisdiction in an appropriate United States District Court for such declaratory and injunctive relief (including a temporary restraining order, a permanent or…”
Indiana Prot. & Advocacy Servs. v. Indiana Fam. & Soc. Servs. Admin., 603 F.3d 365 (7th Cir. 2010). “requirements under [sections 301, 302, and 303]” 42 U.S.C. § 15511 ; see 544 F.3d at 729-30 .”
Ohio Repub. Party v. Brunner, 544 F.3d 711 (6th Cir. 2008). · cites it 3× “42 U.S.C. § 15511 . The U.S. Attorney General has not brought suit.”
Crowley v. Ex rel. Nevada Sec'y of State, 678 F.3d 730 (9th Cir. 2012). “The district court dismissed all of Crowley’s declaratory relief claims for failure to state a cognizable private claim because it *733 ruled, under 42 U.S.C. § 15511 , that “declaratory relief claims are within the express purview of the United States Attorney General’s…”
Cnty. of Nassau v. New York, 724 F. Supp. 2d 295 (E.D.N.Y 2010). “42 U.S.C. § 15511 . Title IV also requires states receiving funds under HAVA to establish administrative grievance procedures.”
Taylor v. Onorato, 428 F. Supp. 2d 384 (W.D. Pa. 2006). “42 U.S.C. § 15511 . Had Congress intended to allow any registered voter to also bring a claim to enforce section 301 it would have clearly said so.”
California Council of the Blind v. Cnty. of Alameda, 985 F. Supp. 2d 1229 (N.D. Cal. 2013). “See 42 U.S.C. § 15511 (providing that the “Attorney General may bring a civil action against any State.”
Ind. Prot. & Adv. Servs. v. Ind. Fam. & Soc., 603 F.3d 365 (7th Cir. 2010). “requirements under [sections 301, 302, and 303]" 42 U.S.C. § 15511 ; see 544 F.3d at 729-30 .”
Ohio Repub. Party v. Brunner, 582 F. Supp. 2d 957 (S.D. Ohio 2008). · cites it 2× “§ 15512 , which requires states to establish an administrative complaint procedure, and 42 U.S.C. § 15511 , which provides that the U.”
Crowley v. Nevada Ex Rel. Nevada Sec'y, 678 F.3d 730 (9th Cir. 2012). “The district court dismissed all of Crowley's declaratory relief claims for failure to state a cognizable private claim because it *733 ruled, under 42 U.S.C. § 15511 , that "declaratory relief claims are within the express purview of the United States Attorney General's…”
Ohio Repub. Party v. Jennifer Brunner (6th Cir. 2008). “42 U.S.C. § 15511 . The U.S. Attorney General has not brought suit.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.