42 U.S.C. § 3796c
Transferred
[transferred]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 21
cases, 1980–2016 · leading case: Calvin Hawkins & Donna L. Hawkins v. United States, 469 F.3d 993 (Fed. Cir. 2006).
Calvin Hawkins & Donna L. Hawkins v. United States, 469 F.3d 993 (Fed. Cir. 2006). “” However, the BJA is authorized under 42 U.S.C. § 3796c(a) to “establish such rules, regulations, and procedures as may be necessary to carry out the purposes of’ the PSOBA.”
Yanco v. United States, 258 F.3d 1356 (Fed. Cir. 2001). “Under 42 U.S.C. § 3796c(a), BJA is “authorized to establish regulations and *1360 procedures as may be necessary to carry out the purposes of this subsection.”
White v. United States, 543 F.3d 1330 (Fed. Cir. 2008). “2(c), or the evidence necessary to establish a potential beneficiary's relationship with the deceased public safety officer, see § 32.12-14. PSOBA is silent as to this part of the processing of the benefits and in fact bestows upon the agency the right to enact implementing…”
Elaine Easley Russell v. Law Enf't Assistance Admin. of the United States of Am., 637 F.2d 354 (5th Cir. 1981). “Indeed, had Congress genuinely intended to make § 3759(a) applicable to PSOBA, it most certainly would have modified the troublesome language in the appellate review provision to reflect that fact. A final, rather telling, consideration is the fact that Congress expressly chose…”
Groff v. United States, 493 F.3d 1343 (Fed. Cir. 2007). “egulations governing the representation of claimants in claims proceedings before the BJA; it authorized the BJA to use appropriated funds to conduct appeals of death and disability claims; it empowered the BJA to use administrative and investigative assistance from state and…”
Julie Amber-Messick, Adm'x of the Est. of Christopher Kangas, Deceased v. United States, 483 F.3d 1316 (Fed. Cir. 2007). “” See 42 U.S.C. § 3796c (“The Bureau is authorized to establish such rules, regulations, and procedures as may be necessary to carry out the purposes of this subchapter.”
Hawkins v. United States, 68 Fed. Cl. 74 (Fed. Cl. 2005). “” 42 U.S.C. § 3796c(a). 28 C.F.R. § 32.2 (c)(1), however, improperly narrowed the effect of Congress’ definition of “law enforcement officers,” so that only the families of law enforcement officers who died in “controlling or reducing crime” or “enforcing the criminal law” would…”
Demutiis v. United States, 48 Fed. Cl. 81 (Fed. Cl. 2000). “” 42 U.S.C. § 3796c(b). See also Chacon, 32 Fed.”
Harold v. United States, 225 Ct. Cl. 168 (Ct. Cl. 1980). “§ 3796b *170 defines certain terms used in the Act and the final section, 42 U.S.C. § 3796c, grants LEAA the power, inter alia, to establish rules and regulations for the administration of the death benefit program established by the Act.”
Tafoya v. United States, 8 Cl. Ct. 256 (Ct. Cl. 1985). “It should be added that 42 U.S.C. § 3796c(b) vests the responsibility for rendering the final determinations regarding benefits in the LEAA.”
Leonard E. Cassella v. United States, 469 F.3d 1376 (Fed. Cir. 2006). “42 U.S.C. § 3796c(a). Pursuant to this authority, the BJA promulgated the regulations set forth in Part 32 of Title 28 of the Code of Federal Regulations ( 28 C.”
Hillensbeck v. United States, 69 Fed. Cl. 369 (Fed. Cl. 2006). “” Congress did not define the term “serving a public agency in an official capacity,” nor does the legislative history of the PSOBA provide specific guidance in this regard.”
— 42 U.S.C. § 3796c(a) — 11 cases
Calvin Hawkins & Donna L. Hawkins v. United States, 469 F.3d 993 (Fed. Cir. 2006). “” However, the BJA is authorized under 42 U.S.C. § 3796c(a) to “establish such rules, regulations, and procedures as may be necessary to carry out the purposes of’ the PSOBA.”
Yanco v. United States, 258 F.3d 1356 (Fed. Cir. 2001). “Under 42 U.S.C. § 3796c(a), BJA is “authorized to establish regulations and *1360 procedures as may be necessary to carry out the purposes of this subsection.”
White v. United States, 543 F.3d 1330 (Fed. Cir. 2008). “2(c), or the evidence necessary to establish a potential beneficiary's relationship with the deceased public safety officer, see § 32.12-14. PSOBA is silent as to this part of the processing of the benefits and in fact bestows upon the agency the right to enact implementing…”
Hawkins v. United States, 68 Fed. Cl. 74 (Fed. Cl. 2005). “” 42 U.S.C. § 3796c(a). 28 C.F.R. § 32.2 (c)(1), however, improperly narrowed the effect of Congress’ definition of “law enforcement officers,” so that only the families of law enforcement officers who died in “controlling or reducing crime” or “enforcing the criminal law” would…”
Leonard E. Cassella v. United States, 469 F.3d 1376 (Fed. Cir. 2006). “42 U.S.C. § 3796c(a). Pursuant to this authority, the BJA promulgated the regulations set forth in Part 32 of Title 28 of the Code of Federal Regulations ( 28 C.”
— 42 U.S.C. § 3796c(b) — 2 cases
Demutiis v. United States, 48 Fed. Cl. 81 (Fed. Cl. 2000). “” 42 U.S.C. § 3796c(b). See also Chacon, 32 Fed.”
Tafoya v. United States, 8 Cl. Ct. 256 (Ct. Cl. 1985). “It should be added that 42 U.S.C. § 3796c(b) vests the responsibility for rendering the final determinations regarding benefits in the LEAA.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.