5 Indiana opinions name it 2 courts 1984–2023 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois Foundationgreen2 sentences2023In 1971, the United States Supreme Court vitiated the mutuality requirement, see Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois Foundation, 402 U.S. 313, 350 (1971), and later “broadened the scope of collateral estoppel beyond its common law limits.” Mendoza, 464 U.S. at 158 (citing Allen, 449 U.S. at 94 ). 1992"Permitting repeated litigation of the same issue as long as the supply of unrelated defendants holds out reflects either the aura of the gaming table or 'a lack of discipline and of disinterestedness on the part of the lower courts, hardly a worthy *590 or wise basis for fashioning rules of procedure.' [Citation omitted.]" Id. at 329, 91 S.Ct. at 1448 . | 2 | 3 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Parklane Hosiery Co. v. Shore
green
1 sentence2023The United States Supreme Court “conditionally” approved offensive collateral estoppel, Mendoza, 464 U.S. at 158 , a move authorized by Parklane Hosiery Company, Inc. v. Shore, 439 U.S. 322 , 331–33 (1979). | 1 | 2023–2023 |
United States v. Mendoza
green
2 sentences2023In 1971, the United States Supreme Court vitiated the mutuality requirement, see Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois Foundation, 402 U.S. 313, 350 (1971), and later “broadened the scope of collateral estoppel beyond its common law limits.” Mendoza, 464 U.S. at 158 (citing Allen, 449 U.S. at 94 ). 2023The United States Supreme Court “conditionally” approved offensive collateral estoppel, Mendoza, 464 U.S. at 158 , a move authorized by Parklane Hosiery Company, Inc. v. Shore, 439 U.S. 322 , 331–33 (1979). | 1 | 2023–2023 |
Allen v. McCurry
green
1 sentence2023In 1971, the United States Supreme Court vitiated the mutuality requirement, see Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois Foundation, 402 U.S. 313, 350 (1971), and later “broadened the scope of collateral estoppel beyond its common law limits.” Mendoza, 464 U.S. at 158 (citing Allen, 449 U.S. at 94 ). | 1 | 2023–2023 |
Turner v. Estate of Turner
green
1 sentence1992In Turner v. Estate of Turner (1983), Ind.App., 454 N.E.2d 1247 , Turner was tried for murdering his parents. | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Hockett v. Breunig
green
1 sentence1992Judge Shields in her concurring opinion in Hockett, supra, recognized the further erosion of the mutuality requirement in this state. | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Bernhard v. Bank of America National Trust & Saving Association
green
2 sentences1992The California Supreme Court repudiated the mutuality requirement in Bernkord v. Bank of America (1942) 19 Cal.2d 807 , 122 P.2d 892 , finding no compelling reason for the party asserting the plea of res judicata to have been a party, or in privity with a party, to the earlier litigation. 1992The California Supreme Court repudiated the mutuality requirement in Bernkord v. Bank of America (1942) 19 Cal.2d 807 , 122 P.2d 892 , finding no compelling reason for the party asserting the plea of res judicata to have been a party, or in privity with a party, to the earlier litigation. | 1 | 1992–1992 |
State, Ind. State Highway Com'n v. Speidel
green
2 sentences1988Speidel, 392 N.E.2d 1172 . 1988Speidel, 392 N.E.2d 1172 . | 1 | 1988–1988 |
Ruddock v. Ohls
green
2 sentences1984In Ruddock v. Ohls (1979), 91 Cal. App.3d 271 , 154 Cal. Rptr. 87 , a child through a guardian ad litem sued to establish a child-parent relationship between herself and her mother's ex-husband. 1984In Ruddock v. Ohls (1979), 91 Cal. App.3d 271 , 154 Cal. Rptr. 87 , a child through a guardian ad litem sued to establish a child-parent relationship between herself and her mother's ex-husband. | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.