5 Indiana opinions name it 2 courts 2001–2023 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Terry v. Ohiogreen2 sentences2009The touchstone of our analysis under the Fourth Amendment is always "the reasonableness in all the circumstances of the particular governmental invasion of a citizen's personal security." Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 19 [, 88 S.Ct. 1868 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 ] (1968). 2009The touchstone of our analysis under the Fourth Amendment is always "the reasonableness in all the circumstances of the particular governmental invasion of a citizen's personal security." Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 19 [, 88 S.Ct. 1868 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 ] (1968). | 2 | 2 |
United States v. Brignoni-Poncegreen2 sentences2009Reasonableness, of course, depends "on a balance between the public interest and the individual's right to personal security free from arbitrary interference by law officers." United States v. Brignoni-Ponce, 422 U.S. 873, 878 [, 95 S.Ct. 2574 , 45 L.Ed.2d 607 ] (1975). 2009Reasonableness, of course, depends "on a balance between the public interest and the individual's right to personal security free from arbitrary interference by law officers." United States v. Brignoni-Ponce, 422 U.S. 873, 878 [, 95 S.Ct. 2574 , 45 L.Ed.2d 607 ] (1975). | 2 | 2 |
Shultz v. Stategreen2 sentences2005I would note that the touchstone of our analysis under the Fourth Amendment is whether an individual has a "constitutionally protected reasonable expectation of privacy." Shultz v. State, 742 N.E.2d 961, 964 (Ind.Ct.App.2001). 2005I would note that the touchstone of our analysis under the Fourth Amendment is whether an individual has a "constitutionally protected reasonable expectation of privacy." Shultz v. State, 742 N.E.2d 961, 964 (Ind.Ct.App.2001). | 2 | 2 |
Howard Regional Health System v. Gordongreen2 sentences2023Doe v. Ind. Dep’t of Ins., 194 N.E.3d 1197 , 1201 (Ind. Ct. App. 2022), trans. denied. [12] The touchstone of a claim of medical malpractice is the “‘curative or salutary conduct of a health care provider acting within his or her professional capacity.’” Metz, 115 N.E.3d at 495 (quoting Howard Reg’l Health Sys. v. Gordon, 952 N.E.2d 182, 185 (Ind. 2011)). 2023Claims that come within the purview of the Act must be based on “‘the provider’s behavior or practices while acting in his professional capacity as a provider of medical services.’” Metz, 115 N.E.3d at 495 (quoting Robertson v. Anonymous Clinic, 63 N.E.3d 349, 358 (Ind. Ct. App. 2016), trans. denied). [13] On the other hand, excluded from the Act is conduct “‘unrelated to the promotion of a patient’s health or the provider’s exercise of professional expertise, skill, or judgment.’” Metz, 115 N.E.3d at 495 (quoting Howard Reg’l Health Sys., 952 N.E.2d at 185 ). | 1 | 1 |
Stephen W. Robertson, Commissioner, Indiana Department of Insurance, as Admin. of the Indiana Patient's Compensation Fund v. Anonymous Clinicgreen1 sentence2023Claims that come within the purview of the Act must be based on “‘the provider’s behavior or practices while acting in his professional capacity as a provider of medical services.’” Metz, 115 N.E.3d at 495 (quoting Robertson v. Anonymous Clinic, 63 N.E.3d 349, 358 (Ind. Ct. App. 2016), trans. denied). [13] On the other hand, excluded from the Act is conduct “‘unrelated to the promotion of a patient’s health or the provider’s exercise of professional expertise, skill, or judgment.’” Metz, 115 N.E.3d at 495 (quoting Howard Reg’l Health Sys., 952 N.E.2d at 185 ). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Amy K. Metz, as Mother and Next Friend of Kiara K. Metz, an incapacitated minor v. Saint Joseph Regional Medical Center-Plymouth Campus, Inc. (mem. dec.)
green
2 sentences2023Doe v. Ind. Dep’t of Ins., 194 N.E.3d 1197 , 1201 (Ind. Ct. App. 2022), trans. denied. [12] The touchstone of a claim of medical malpractice is the “‘curative or salutary conduct of a health care provider acting within his or her professional capacity.’” Metz, 115 N.E.3d at 495 (quoting Howard Reg’l Health Sys. v. Gordon, 952 N.E.2d 182, 185 (Ind. 2011)). 2023Claims that come within the purview of the Act must be based on “‘the provider’s behavior or practices while acting in his professional capacity as a provider of medical services.’” Metz, 115 N.E.3d at 495 (quoting Robertson v. Anonymous Clinic, 63 N.E.3d 349, 358 (Ind. Ct. App. 2016), trans. denied). [13] On the other hand, excluded from the Act is conduct “‘unrelated to the promotion of a patient’s health or the provider’s exercise of professional expertise, skill, or judgment.’” Metz, 115 N.E.3d at 495 (quoting Howard Reg’l Health Sys., 952 N.E.2d at 185 ). | 1 | 2023–2023 |
Pennsylvania v. Mimms
green
2 sentences2001In Pennsylvania v. Mimms, 434 U.S. 106 , 98 S.Ct. 330 , 54 L.Ed.2d 331 (1977), the United States Supreme Court, confronting a claim that a weapon was improperly seized during a routine traffic stop, explained: The touchstone of our analysis under the Fourth Amendment is always "the reasonableness in all the cireumstances of the particular governmental invasion of a citizen's personal security." Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 19 [, 88 S.Ct. 1868 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 ] (1968). 2001In Pennsylvania v. Mimms, 434 U.S. 106 , 98 S.Ct. 330 , 54 L.Ed.2d 331 (1977), the United States Supreme Court, confronting a claim that a weapon was improperly seized during a routine traffic stop, explained: The touchstone of our analysis under the Fourth Amendment is always "the reasonableness in all the cireumstances of the particular governmental invasion of a citizen's personal security." Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 19 [, 88 S.Ct. 1868 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 ] (1968). | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.