Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Kansas opinions name it 2 courts 1980–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Kansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Kansas. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Kansas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Gray
green
2 sentences2010With respect to the timeliness rule, Gray stated that “[t]he subsequent consent was given within a minute or less of when the officer checked the ‘refusal’ box on the consent form.” 270 Kan. at 797 . 2010With respect to the timeliness rule, Gray stated that "[t]he subsequent consent was given within a minute or less of when the officer checked the `refusal' box on the consent form." 270 Kan. at 797 , 18 P.3d 962 . | 2 | 2010–2010 |
Allen v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.
green
2 sentences2005K.S.A. 77-621(a)(7); Allen v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 184 Kan. 184, 185-86 , 334 P.2d 370 (1959). 2005K.S.A. 77-621(a)(7); Allen v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 184 Kan. 184, 185-86 , 334 P.2d 370 (1959). | 2 | 1980–2005 |
Riedel v. Gage Plumbing & Heating Co.
neutral
2 sentences2005The timeliness of a claim is primarily an issue of fact, Riedel v. Gage Plumbing & Heating Co., 202 Kan. 538, 541 , 449 P.2d 521 (1969), which should not be disturbed on appeal if it is supported by substantial competent evidence. 2005The timeliness of a claim is primarily an issue of fact, Riedel v. Gage Plumbing & Heating Co., 202 Kan. 538, 541 , 449 P.2d 521 (1969), which should not be disturbed on appeal if it is supported by substantial competent evidence. | 2 | 1980–2005 |
State v. Ortiz
green
2 sentences2021State v. Ortiz, 230 Kan. 733 , Syl. ¶ 3, 640 P.2d 1255 (1982). 2021State v. Ortiz, 230 Kan. 733 , Syl. ¶ 3, 640 P.2d 1255 (1982). | 1 | 2021–2021 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.