timeliness claim (Kansas) · Go Syfert
← Kansas issues

timeliness claim in Kansas

5 Kansas opinions name it 2 courts 1980–2021 1 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Kansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (0)

CaseFollowedCited
No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Kansas.

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Kansas. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (4)

CaseCitedYears
State v. Gray green
kan · 2001
2 sentences

2010With respect to the timeliness rule, Gray stated that "[t]he subsequent consent was given within a minute or less of when the officer checked the `refusal' box on the consent form." 270 Kan. at 797 , 18 P.3d 962 .

2010With respect to the timeliness rule, Gray stated that “[t]he subsequent consent was given within a minute or less of when the officer checked the ‘refusal’ box on the consent form.” 270 Kan. at 797 .

22010–2010
Allen v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. green
kan · 1959
2 sentences

2005K.S.A. 77-621(a)(7); Allen v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 184 Kan. 184, 185-86 , 334 P.2d 370 (1959).

2005K.S.A. 77-621(a)(7); Allen v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 184 Kan. 184, 185-86 , 334 P.2d 370 (1959).

21980–2005
Riedel v. Gage Plumbing & Heating Co. neutral
kan · 1969
2 sentences

2005The timeliness of a claim is primarily an issue of fact, Riedel v. Gage Plumbing & Heating Co., 202 Kan. 538, 541 , 449 P.2d 521 (1969), which should not be disturbed on appeal if it is supported by substantial competent evidence.

2005The timeliness of a claim is primarily an issue of fact, Riedel v. Gage Plumbing & Heating Co., 202 Kan. 538, 541 , 449 P.2d 521 (1969), which should not be disturbed on appeal if it is supported by substantial competent evidence.

21980–2005
State v. Ortiz green
kan · 1982
2 sentences

2021State v. Ortiz, 230 Kan. 733 , Syl. ¶ 3, 640 P.2d 1255 (1982).

2021State v. Ortiz, 230 Kan. 733 , Syl. ¶ 3, 640 P.2d 1255 (1982).

12021–2021

Where else courts name it

PA 1486 (1977–2026) CA 110 (1974–2026) NY 71 (1972–2026) OH 58 (1984–2026) IL 49 (1975–2026) TX 32 (1972–2025) AZ 27 (1979–2022) CT 22 (1982–2016) NM 19 (1988–2024) MO 19 (1992–2023) FL 16 (1985–2025) UT 13 (1937–2017) MD 13 (1992–2011) WA 13 (1984–2024) IA 12 (1979–2026) AL 12 (1983–2024) TN 12 (2010–2026) CO 10 (1984–2026) AR 10 (1994–2024) MA 9 (1985–2022) IN 9 (2013–2025) DE 9 (1997–2026) GA 9 (1973–2026) NJ 8 (1979–2021) MN 8 (1975–2015) OR 7 (1977–2018) MT 6 (2001–2015) ID 6 (1993–2015) LA 6 (1991–2016) MI 5 (1992–2006) KS 5 (1980–2021) WI 5 (1980–2019) NC 4 (2006–2025) VA 4 (2007–2026) MS 4 (2006–2017) WV 4 (2012–2024) NH 4 (1992–2003) HI 3 (2015–2021) VT 3 (2005–2025) WY 3 (2001–2021) NV 3 (2016–2023) SC 3 (2009–2019) VI 3 (2012–2014) RI 3 (2003–2014) ME 2 (2009–2025) DC 2 (1996–2022) AK 2 (1974–1987) SD 2 (1990–2009)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check