5 Kentucky opinions name it 2 courts 2018–2025 4 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Kentucky courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
London v. Collinsgreen1 sentence2024See London v. Collins, 242 S.W.3d 351, 357 (Ky. App. 2007) (holding that though permanency order in dependency case might otherwise qualify as a custody decree, permanency order at issue was not a valid custody decree in part because parent was not given formal notice that the scheduled hearing was for purposes of resolving custody).15 Thus, we VACATE the family court’s awarding sole custody to Father and remand for further proceedings in conformity with this Opinion. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Kentucky. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Murphy v. Murphy
green
1 sentence2025Id. at 868 . | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Gormley v. Judicial Conduct Commission
green
1 sentence2024In Gormley, there was a scheduled hearing before Judge Gormley on a pro se motion by a wife to modify the no contact provision of a domestic violence order previously entered against her husband. 332 S.W.3d at 721 . | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Kentucky Bar Association v. Justin Ross Morgan
neutral
1 sentence2022Id. | 1 | 2022–2022 |
Diaz v. Barker
green
1 sentence2018But, two days before the scheduled hearing date, Lindsey filed a second affidavit pursuant to KRS 26A.020, seeking recusal of the circuit judge and the appointment of a special judge, which stayed the action. "[U]nder the recusal remedy set out in KRS 26A.020(1), the [circuit] judge is not to make the recusal determination and the case is to be held in abeyance pending the Chief Justice's determination." Diaz v. Barker , 254 S.W.3d 835 , 838 (Ky. App. 2008) (citation omitted). | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.