Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Arkansas opinions name it 2 courts 1997–2026 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Arkansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Allen v. Stategreen2 sentences1997See Allen v. State, 327 Ark. 350 , 939 S.W.2d 270 (1997) (holding that the appellate court does not attempt to weigh the evidence or pass on the credibility of witnesses; that duty is left to the trier of fact). 1997See Allen v. State, 327 Ark. 350 , 939 S.W.2d 270 (1997) (holding that the appellate court does not attempt to weigh the evidence or pass on the credibility of witnesses; that duty is left to the trier of fact). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Arkansas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Davis v. Dir.
neutral
2 sentences2013No final decision had been made to terminate Ms. Davis’s 6 Cite as 2013 Ark. 2013No final decision had been made to terminate Ms. Davis’s 6 Cite as 2013 Ark. | 2 | 2013–2013 |
Richardson v. State
green
1 sentence2026App. 234 , 576 S.W.3d 73 , and where the defendant failed to surrender himself to the sheriff’s department as ordered, Richardson v. State, 85 Ark. | 1 | 2026–2026 |
Dye v. State
neutral
2 sentences2026We observe that in Nixon’s brief, he does not argue that the State’s evidence was insufficient to prove he committed forgery. 8 defendant failed to appear at a scheduled hearing as ordered, Dye v. State, 2019 Ark. 2026App. 234 , 576 S.W.3d 73 , and where the defendant failed to surrender himself to the sheriff’s department as ordered, Richardson v. State, 85 Ark. | 1 | 2026–2026 |
AAA Bail Bond Co. v. State
neutral
1 sentence2022In AAA Bail Bond Co. v. State, 55 Ark. | 1 | 2022–2022 |
Beth's Bail Bonds, Inc. v. State
neutral
1 sentence2022App. 183 , 486 S.W.3d 822 , we explained that the most critical date regarding the bond forfeiture was the date when the defendant failed to appear in court for a scheduled hearing. | 1 | 2022–2022 |
Owens v. State
green
2 sentences2018Owens v. State , 354 Ark. 644 , 128 S.W.3d 445 (2003). 2018Owens v. State , 354 Ark. 644 , 128 S.W.3d 445 (2003). | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Martindale v. Richmond
green
2 sentences2006In Martindale, the attorney claimed that he did not learn about his prior representation of the former husband until five minutes before the scheduled hearing and that such late notice was merely a tactic to force settlement or a delay of the hearing. 301 Ark. 167 , 782 S.W.2d 582 . 2006In Martindale, the attorney claimed that he did not learn about his prior representation of the former husband until five minutes before the scheduled hearing and that such late notice was merely a tactic to force settlement or a delay of the hearing. 301 Ark. 167 , 782 S.W.2d 582 . | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.