Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 South Carolina opinions name it 2 courts 1981–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by South Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
In the Matter of Margaret D. Fabrigreen2 sentences2021See In re Fabri, 418 S.C. 384, 389 , 793 S.E.2d 306, 309 (2016) (per curiam). 2021See In re Fabri, 418 S.C. 384, 389 , 793 S.E.2d 306, 309 (2016) (per curiam). | 1 | 1 |
Williams v. Teran, Inc.green2 sentences2020See Williams v. Teran, Inc., 266 S.C. 55, 60 , 221 S.E.2d 526, 529 (1976) (noting that any doubt in a contract must be resolved against the drafting party); Mid-Continent Refrigerator Co. v. Way, 263 S.C. 101, 104-05 , 208 S.E.2d 31, 32 (1974) (noting that ambiguities or conflicts in documents constituting a contract must be construed against the party who drafted the contract). 2020See Williams v. Teran, Inc., 266 S.C. 55, 60 , 221 S.E.2d 526, 529 (1976) (noting that any doubt in a contract must be resolved against the drafting party); Mid-Continent Refrigerator Co. v. Way, 263 S.C. 101, 104-05 , 208 S.E.2d 31, 32 (1974) (noting that ambiguities or conflicts in documents constituting a contract must be construed against the party who drafted the contract). | 1 | 1 |
Mid-Continent Refrigerator Co. v. Waygreen2 sentences2020See Williams v. Teran, Inc., 266 S.C. 55, 60 , 221 S.E.2d 526, 529 (1976) (noting that any doubt in a contract must be resolved against the drafting party); Mid-Continent Refrigerator Co. v. Way, 263 S.C. 101, 104-05 , 208 S.E.2d 31, 32 (1974) (noting that ambiguities or conflicts in documents constituting a contract must be construed against the party who drafted the contract). 2020See Williams v. Teran, Inc., 266 S.C. 55, 60 , 221 S.E.2d 526, 529 (1976) (noting that any doubt in a contract must be resolved against the drafting party); Mid-Continent Refrigerator Co. v. Way, 263 S.C. 101, 104-05 , 208 S.E.2d 31, 32 (1974) (noting that ambiguities or conflicts in documents constituting a contract must be construed against the party who drafted the contract). | 1 | 1 |
Trotter v. TRANE COIL FACILITYgreen2 sentences2012Regs. 67–613(B) (Supp. 2011) (providing the Appellate Panel has the authority to postpone a scheduled hearing in a workers' compensation matter for "good cause," which includes such reasons as the need for additional discovery); Trotter v. Trane Coil Facility , 393 S.C. 637, 645 , 714 S.E.2d 289, 293 (2011) ("The granting or refusal of a request for a continuance rests in the sound discretion of the [Appellate Panel], whose ruling will not be disturbed unless a clear abuse of discretion is shown. 2012Regs. 67–613(B) (Supp. 2011) (providing the Appellate Panel has the authority to postpone a scheduled hearing in a workers' compensation matter for "good cause," which includes such reasons as the need for additional discovery); Trotter v. Trane Coil Facility , 393 S.C. 637, 645 , 714 S.E.2d 289, 293 (2011) ("The granting or refusal of a request for a continuance rests in the sound discretion of the [Appellate Panel], whose ruling will not be disturbed unless a clear abuse of discretion is shown. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in South Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Argoe v. THREE RIVERS BEHAVIORAL HEALTH
green
1 sentence2017Id. | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Bonnette v. State
green
1 sentence1982O’Neil v. State, S. C., 285 S. E. (2d) 352 (1981); Bonnette v. State, S. C., 282 S. E. (2d) 597 (1981). | 1 | 1982–1982 |
State v. Wheeler
green
1 sentence1981State v. Wheeler, 259 S. C. 571, 193 S. E. (2d) 515 (1972); Blandshaw v. State, 245 S. C. 385, 104 S. E. (2d) 784 (1965); (3) Failure to appear, at least through an attorney, at the scheduled hearing. | 1 | 1981–1981 |
State v. Rabens
green
1 sentence1981State v. Roberts, 79 S. C. 542, 60 S. E. 442 (1908); (4) Plea negotiations and silence before the trial court regarding the desire for a preliminary hearing when entering a guilty plea. | 1 | 1981–1981 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.