scheduled hearing in Nebraska

2018Cite as 300 Neb. 510 Before considering the motion to recuse, the court requested briefs from the parties and heard arguments on the issue of whether or not the juvenile court was bound by the district court’s order to suppress statements J.K. had made on August 17, 2015.

2018Cite as 300 Neb. 510 Before considering the motion to recuse, the court requested briefs from the parties and heard arguments on the issue of whether or not the juvenile court was bound by the district court’s order to suppress statements J.K. had made on August 17, 2015.

2018To the contrary, in In re Interest of Cassandra B. & Moira B., 290 Neb. 619 , 861 N.W.2d 398 (2015), the juvenile court's order prohibited a parent from homeschooling one of the children, pending further order of the court.

2018To the contrary, in In re Interest of Cassandra B. & Moira B., 290 Neb. 619 , 861 N.W.2d 398 (2015), the juvenile court’s order prohibited a parent from homeschooling one of the children, pending further order of the court.

2026App. 622 , 657 N.W.2d 650 (2003). 31 Id. - 401 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 321 Nebraska Reports STATE v. COLLINS Cite as 321 Neb. 381 of Appeals did not simply file the statutorily required notice, but “took the additional step of requesting a pretrial hearing and ruling.” 32 At the scheduled hearing on the motion, other matters were considered, but the defendant did not argue the motion, which remained pending at the time of the defendant’s motion for discharge.

2026App. 622 , 657 N.W.2d 650 (2003). 31 Id. - 401 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 321 Nebraska Reports STATE v. COLLINS Cite as 321 Neb. 381 of Appeals did not simply file the statutorily required notice, but “took the additional step of requesting a pretrial hearing and ruling.” 32 At the scheduled hearing on the motion, other matters were considered, but the defendant did not argue the motion, which remained pending at the time of the defendant’s motion for discharge.

2026App. 622 , 657 N.W.2d 650 (2003). 31 Id. - 401 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 321 Nebraska Reports STATE v. COLLINS Cite as 321 Neb. 381 of Appeals did not simply file the statutorily required notice, but “took the additional step of requesting a pretrial hearing and ruling.” 32 At the scheduled hearing on the motion, other matters were considered, but the defendant did not argue the motion, which remained pending at the time of the defendant’s motion for discharge.

2022If any of the responding parties fails to appear, the Appeal Tribunal will proceed with the hearing and render a decision based on evidence received from the appeal- ing party. 22 The role of the hearing officer is also governed by regula- tion: “The hearing officer shall function as an impartial fact finder and must attempt to obtain the reasonably available, competent evidence necessary to resolve the issues of the case, but shall not act as an advocate for any party.” 23 In reaching an “independent conclusion regarding the facts of any case,” the hearing officer must follow “Nebraska Statut

2022If any of the responding parties fails to appear, the Appeal Tribunal will proceed with the hearing and render a decision based on evidence received from the appeal- ing party. 22 The role of the hearing officer is also governed by regula- tion: “The hearing officer shall function as an impartial fact finder and must attempt to obtain the reasonably available, competent evidence necessary to resolve the issues of the case, but shall not act as an advocate for any party.” 23 In reaching an “independent conclusion regarding the facts of any case,” the hearing officer must follow “Nebraska Statut

2022In reviewing the facts of this case, we are mindful of the Nebraska Supreme Court’s statement in In re Interest of Landon H., 287 Neb. 105, 112 , 841 N.W.2d 369 , 374-75 (2013), wherein the court held: We clarified that juvenile courts are not required to conduct inquiries into the whereabouts of every parent who fails to appear for a scheduled hearing.

2021The Grievance Committee “shall not ask ques- tions but may, through the Hearings Officer, ask for clarifica- tion of statements or evidence.” At the end of the hearing, the Grievance Committee “shall privately deliberate” before issu- ing its written decision concerning the grievance. - 63 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 309 Nebraska Reports CHAMPION v. HALL COUNTY Cite as 309 Neb. 55 (b) Joint Stipulation of Facts Before the scheduled hearing, the parties filed with the Grievance Committee a joint stipulation of facts.

2004We do not intend by this holding to require juvenile courts “to conduct an inquiry as to the whereabouts of every respondent parent who fails to appear for a scheduled hearing in order to ascertain whether their absence is attributable to incarceration.” In re Stephen Tyler R., 213 W.

2004Va. at 733 , 584 S.E.2d at 589 .