8 New Jersey opinions name it 2 courts 1960–2022 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New Jersey courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Pipquarryco, Inc. v. Hamburg Boroughgreen2 sentences2010Finally: [w]here, on or before the scheduled hearing date, a taxpayer communicates to the county board the taxpayer’s desire to prosecute an appeal and provides reasonable indicia that the taxpayer will, on a later date, be prepared to proceed in a “meaningful manner”, the taxpayer’s conduct should not be regarded as either “deliberate” or “contemptuous”, and the county board should not dismiss the appeal for failure to prosecute. [Pipquarryco, Inc. v. Borough of Hamburg, 15 N.J.Tax 413, 418-19 (1996).] Mt. 1996In so doing, the court noted: Where, on or before the scheduled hearing date, a taxpayer communicates to the county board the taxpayer’s desire to prosecute an appeal and provides reasonable indicia that the taxpayer will, on a later date, be prepared to proceed in a “meaningful manner”, the taxpayer’s conduct should not be regarded as either “deliberate” or “contemptuous”, and the county board should not dismiss the appeal for failure to prosecute. [15 N.J.Tax at 418-19.] The conduct of plaintiff herein, through its attorney, does not satisfy the standard articulated in Pipquarryco for denial | 2 | 2 |
VEEDER v. Township of Berkeleygreen1 sentence2022See Veeder v. Twp. of Berkeley, 109 N.J. | 1 | 1 |
Allegro v. Afton Village Corp.green1 sentence2022See Allegro, 9 N.J. at 160-61 . | 1 | 1 |
Jepson Refrigeration Corp. v. City of Trentongreen1 sentence2020Super. at 353 .; (See Jepson Refrigeration Corp. v. City of Trenton, 295 N.J. | 1 | 1 |
Stirling v. City of Plainfieldgreen1 sentence1960Stirling v. City of Plainfield, 136 N.J.L. 38, 40-41 ( E. & A. 1947). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New Jersey. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
West Essex Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Montville Township
green
2 sentences2022Id. 2022He was obligated to appear before the Board on the hearing date…” Id. at 3 156. | 1 | 2022–2022 |
Rutherford v. BOR. OF RUTHERFORD
green
2 sentences2020“Where, on or before the scheduled hearing date, a taxpayer communicates to the county board the taxpayer's desire to prosecute an appeal and provides reasonable indicia that the taxpayer will, on a later date, be prepared to proceed in a ‘meaningful manner’, the taxpayer's conduct should not be regarded as either ‘deliberate’ or ‘contemptuous’, and the county board should not dismiss the appeal for failure to prosecute.” Id. at 419 . “[T]he drastic step of dismissal should not be invoked unless it is clear that the conduct of the offending party is deliberate.” Rutherford Realty Assoc. v. Bor 2020“Where, on or before the scheduled hearing date, a taxpayer communicates to the county board the taxpayer's desire to prosecute an appeal and provides reasonable indicia that the taxpayer will, on a later date, be prepared to proceed in a ‘meaningful manner’, the taxpayer's conduct should not be regarded as either ‘deliberate’ or ‘contemptuous’, and the county board should not dismiss the appeal for failure to prosecute.” Id. at 419 . “[T]he drastic step of dismissal should not be invoked unless it is clear that the conduct of the offending party is deliberate.” Rutherford Realty Assoc. v. Bor | 1 | 2020–2020 |
VSH Realty, Inc. v. Harding Township
green
2 sentences2010Id. at 298 , 677 A.2d 274 . 2010Id. at 298 , 677 A.2d 274 . | 1 | 2010–2010 |
ARP Realty Associates v. Washington Borough
green
1 sentence1998Where, on or before the scheduled hearing date, a taxpayer communicates to the county board the taxpayer’s desire to prosecute an appeal and provides reasonable indicia that the taxpayer will, on a later date, be prepared to proceed in a “meaningful manner”, the taxpayer’s conduct should not be regarded as either “deliberate” or “contemptuous”, and the county board should not dismiss the appeal for failure to prosecute. [Id at 418-19.] In ARP Realty Assocs. v. Washington Bor., 16 N.J.Tax, 281 (Tax 1997), the attorney for the taxpayer appeared before the county board on the scheduled hearing da | 1 | 1998–1998 |
International Federation of Professional & Technical Engineers, Local 194A v. BRIDGE COM'N
green
2 sentences1996Id. at 17 , 572 A. 2d 204 . 1996Id. at 17 , 572 A. 2d 204 . | 1 | 1996–1996 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.