11 Mississippi opinions name it 2 courts 1994–2025 4 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Mississippi courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Isom v. Jernigangreen2 sentences2023A similar situation arose in Isom v. Jernigan, 840 So. 2d 104 (Miss. 2003), when the defendant Kelly was served her Rule 81 summons six days before a scheduled hearing. 2023Id. at 106 (¶8). | 2 | 2 |
Mississippi Department of Employment Security v. Johnsongreen2 sentences2013Id. at 1275-76 (¶ 6). ¶ 4. 2010Id. at 1275-76 (¶ 6). | 2 | 2 |
Carl Ronnie Daricek Living Trust v. Hancock County Ex Rel. Board of Supervisorsgreen1 sentence2024The hearing itself is fundamental: it is a public forum where the landowner 3 In Daricek Living Trust, the Supreme Court strongly implied that if a total seizure of property was at stake via eminent domain, a minimal time period of 30 days was required. 34 So. 3d at 595 (¶17) (holding that “[t]hirty-days’ notice is constitutionally sufficient” and relying on Branaman v. Long Beach Water Mgmt. | 1 | 1 |
Carr v. Stategreen1 sentence2020Id. at 263 (¶4). | 1 | 1 |
In Re Hamptongreen2 sentences2019The majority also cites In re Hampton , 919 So.2d 949 , 957 (Miss. 2006), which involved an attorney who filed a petition for a writ of prohibition and then failed to appear at the scheduled hearing. 2019The majority also cites In re Hampton, 919 So. 2d 949, 957 (Miss. 2006), which involved an attorney who filed a petition for a writ of prohibition and then failed to appear at the scheduled hearing. | 1 | 1 |
Manning v. King's Daughters Medical Centergreen2 sentences2016In Manning, 138 So.3d at 116 (¶21), the supreme court recognized its recent holding that “a plaintiffs failure .to respond to discovery for approximately seventeen months supported a finding of a clear record of delay, sufficient to warrant dismissal with prejudice.” (Citing Holder v. Orange Grove Med. 2016In Manning, 138 So. 3d at 116 (¶21), the supreme court recognized its recent holding that “a plaintiff's failure to respond to discovery for approximately seventeen months supported a finding of a clear record of delay, sufficient to warrant dismissal with prejudice.” (Citing Holder v. Orange Grove Med. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Mississippi. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Scales v. Lackey Memorial Hosp.
green
1 sentence2025The court then discussed relevant caselaw—including this Court’s decisions in Rainer and Scales v. Lackey Memorial Hosp., 988 So. 2d 426 (Miss. | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Williams v. Mississippi Department of Employment Security
green
2 sentences2024On appeal, this Court noted that Williams was mailed a “notice of telephonic hearing” containing the same cautionary language that the Coe Law Firm in this case received, namely that “[f]ailure to provide a valid telephone number, or the inability to receive a call at the time of the scheduled hearing, may result in the loss of the case.” Id. at (¶4). 2024Although failure to appear may be excused by a showing of good cause, Williams provided nothing but a claim of a “telecommunications error.” Id. | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Barker v. Wingo
green
2 sentences1994Finding that the Tribunal was incorrect in applying the factors set forth in Barker v. Wingo, 407 U.S. 514 , 92 S.Ct. 2182 , 33 L.Ed.2d 101 (1972), we reverse and remand for another disciplinary proceeding. 1994Finding that the Tribunal was incorrect in applying the factors set forth in Barker v. Wingo, 407 U.S. 514 , 92 S.Ct. 2182 , 33 L.Ed.2d 101 (1972), we reverse and remand for another disciplinary proceeding. | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.