5 Oklahoma opinions name it 2 courts 1934–2017 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Oklahoma courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
In Re Initiative Petition No. 379green2 sentences2017In McCurley , the Court explained the permit was in violation of an ordinance, the permittee possessed constructive knowledge the permit was in violation of the ordinance, and permittee's position was substantially unchanged since the construction permittee had undertaken was limited to "four or five men" doing "a half day's work." Id . 280 P. at 472 . 62 Bankoff v. Board of Adjustment of Wagoner County , 1994 OK 58, n.9 , 875 P.2d 1138, 1143 , citing, Burdick v. Independent School , 1985 OK 49 , 702 P.2d 48 (If the facts and circumstances implicate a prevailing public interest, the case will 2017In McCurley , the Court explained the permit was in violation of an ordinance, the permittee possessed constructive knowledge the permit was in violation of the ordinance, and permittee's position was substantially unchanged since the construction permittee had undertaken was limited to "four or five men" doing "a half day's work." Id . 280 P. at 472 . 62 Bankoff v. Board of Adjustment of Wagoner County , 1994 OK 58, n.9 , 875 P.2d 1138, 1143 , citing, Burdick v. Independent School , 1985 OK 49 , 702 P.2d 48 (If the facts and circumstances implicate a prevailing public interest, the case will | 2 | 2 |
Rose Brothers, Inc. v. City of Alvagreen2 sentences2017In McCurley , the Court explained the permit was in violation of an ordinance, the permittee possessed constructive knowledge the permit was in violation of the ordinance, and permittee's position was substantially unchanged since the construction permittee had undertaken was limited to "four or five men" doing "a half day's work." Id . 280 P. at 472 . 62 Bankoff v. Board of Adjustment of Wagoner County , 1994 OK 58, n.9 , 875 P.2d 1138, 1143 , citing, Burdick v. Independent School , 1985 OK 49 , 702 P.2d 48 (If the facts and circumstances implicate a prevailing public interest, the case will 2017In McCurley , the Court explained the permit was in violation of an ordinance, the permittee possessed constructive knowledge the permit was in violation of the ordinance, and permittee's position was substantially unchanged since the construction permittee had undertaken was limited to "four or five men" doing "a half day's work." Id . 280 P. at 472 . 62 Bankoff v. Board of Adjustment of Wagoner County , 1994 OK 58, n.9 , 875 P.2d 1138, 1143 , citing, Burdick v. Independent School , 1985 OK 49 , 702 P.2d 48 (If the facts and circumstances implicate a prevailing public interest, the case will | 1 | 2 |
Bankoff v. Board of Adjustmentgreen2 sentences2017In McCurley , the Court explained the permit was in violation of an ordinance, the permittee possessed constructive knowledge the permit was in violation of the ordinance, and permittee's position was substantially unchanged since the construction permittee had undertaken was limited to "four or five men" doing "a half day's work." Id . 280 P. at 472 . 62 Bankoff v. Board of Adjustment of Wagoner County , 1994 OK 58, n.9 , 875 P.2d 1138, 1143 , citing, Burdick v. Independent School , 1985 OK 49 , 702 P.2d 48 (If the facts and circumstances implicate a prevailing public interest, the case will 2017In McCurley , the Court explained the permit was in violation of an ordinance, the permittee possessed constructive knowledge the permit was in violation of the ordinance, and permittee's position was substantially unchanged since the construction permittee had undertaken was limited to "four or five men" doing "a half day's work." Id . 280 P. at 472 . 62 Bankoff v. Board of Adjustment of Wagoner County , 1994 OK 58, n.9 , 875 P.2d 1138, 1143 , citing, Burdick v. Independent School , 1985 OK 49 , 702 P.2d 48 (If the facts and circumstances implicate a prevailing public interest, the case will | 1 | 2 |
City of Enid v. Warner-Quinlan Asphalt Co.green2 sentences2017In McCurley , the Court explained the permit was in violation of an ordinance, the permittee possessed constructive knowledge the permit was in violation of the ordinance, and permittee's position was substantially unchanged since the construction permittee had undertaken was limited to "four or five men" doing "a half day's work." Id . 280 P. at 472 . 62 Bankoff v. Board of Adjustment of Wagoner County , 1994 OK 58, n.9 , 875 P.2d 1138, 1143 , citing, Burdick v. Independent School , 1985 OK 49 , 702 P.2d 48 (If the facts and circumstances implicate a prevailing public interest, the case will 2017In McCurley , the Court explained the permit was in violation of an ordinance, the permittee possessed constructive knowledge the permit was in violation of the ordinance, and permittee's position was substantially unchanged since the construction permittee had undertaken was limited to "four or five men" doing "a half day's work." Id . 280 P. at 472 . 62 Bankoff v. Board of Adjustment of Wagoner County , 1994 OK 58, n.9 , 875 P.2d 1138, 1143 , citing, Burdick v. Independent School , 1985 OK 49 , 702 P.2d 48 (If the facts and circumstances implicate a prevailing public interest, the case will | 1 | 2 |
Cochran v. Norrisgreen2 sentences2017In McCurley , the Court explained the permit was in violation of an ordinance, the permittee possessed constructive knowledge the permit was in violation of the ordinance, and permittee's position was substantially unchanged since the construction permittee had undertaken was limited to "four or five men" doing "a half day's work." Id . 280 P. at 472 . 62 Bankoff v. Board of Adjustment of Wagoner County , 1994 OK 58, n.9 , 875 P.2d 1138, 1143 , citing, Burdick v. Independent School , 1985 OK 49 , 702 P.2d 48 (If the facts and circumstances implicate a prevailing public interest, the case will 2017In McCurley , the Court explained the permit was in violation of an ordinance, the permittee possessed constructive knowledge the permit was in violation of the ordinance, and permittee's position was substantially unchanged since the construction permittee had undertaken was limited to "four or five men" doing "a half day's work." Id . 280 P. at 472 . 62 Bankoff v. Board of Adjustment of Wagoner County , 1994 OK 58, n.9 , 875 P.2d 1138, 1143 , citing, Burdick v. Independent School , 1985 OK 49 , 702 P.2d 48 (If the facts and circumstances implicate a prevailing public interest, the case will | 1 | 2 |
McCurley v. City of El Renogreen2 sentences2017In McCurley , the Court explained the permit was in violation of an ordinance, the permittee possessed constructive knowledge the permit was in violation of the ordinance, and permittee's position was substantially unchanged since the construction permittee had undertaken was limited to "four or five men" doing "a half day's work." Id . 280 P. at 472 . 62 Bankoff v. Board of Adjustment of Wagoner County , 1994 OK 58, n.9 , 875 P.2d 1138, 1143 , citing, Burdick v. Independent School , 1985 OK 49 , 702 P.2d 48 (If the facts and circumstances implicate a prevailing public interest, the case will 2017In McCurley , the Court explained the permit was in violation of an ordinance, the permittee possessed constructive knowledge the permit was in violation of the ordinance, and permittee's position was substantially unchanged since the construction permittee had undertaken was limited to "four or five men" doing "a half day's work." Id . 280 P. at 472. 62 Bankoff v. Board of Adjustment of Wagoner County , 1994 OK 58, n.9, 875 P.2d 1138, 1143, citing, Burdick v. Independent School , 1985 OK 49, 702 P.2d 48 (If the facts and circumstances implicate a prevailing public interest, the case will exce | 1 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Oklahoma. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Burdick v. Independent School District No. 52
green
2 sentences2017In McCurley , the Court explained the permit was in violation of an ordinance, the permittee possessed constructive knowledge the permit was in violation of the ordinance, and permittee's position was substantially unchanged since the construction permittee had undertaken was limited to "four or five men" doing "a half day's work." Id . 280 P. at 472 . 62 Bankoff v. Board of Adjustment of Wagoner County , 1994 OK 58, n.9 , 875 P.2d 1138, 1143 , citing, Burdick v. Independent School , 1985 OK 49 , 702 P.2d 48 (If the facts and circumstances implicate a prevailing public interest, the case will 2017In McCurley , the Court explained the permit was in violation of an ordinance, the permittee possessed constructive knowledge the permit was in violation of the ordinance, and permittee's position was substantially unchanged since the construction permittee had undertaken was limited to "four or five men" doing "a half day's work." Id . 280 P. at 472. 62 Bankoff v. Board of Adjustment of Wagoner County , 1994 OK 58, n.9, 875 P.2d 1138, 1143, citing, Burdick v. Independent School , 1985 OK 49, 702 P.2d 48 (If the facts and circumstances implicate a prevailing public interest, the case will exce | 2 | 2017–2017 |
General Motors Corp. v. Oklahoma County Board of Equalization
green
2 sentences2017In McCurley , the Court explained the permit was in violation of an ordinance, the permittee possessed constructive knowledge the permit was in violation of the ordinance, and permittee's position was substantially unchanged since the construction permittee had undertaken was limited to "four or five men" doing "a half day's work." Id . 280 P. at 472 . 62 Bankoff v. Board of Adjustment of Wagoner County , 1994 OK 58, n.9 , 875 P.2d 1138, 1143 , citing, Burdick v. Independent School , 1985 OK 49 , 702 P.2d 48 (If the facts and circumstances implicate a prevailing public interest, the case will 2017In McCurley , the Court explained the permit was in violation of an ordinance, the permittee possessed constructive knowledge the permit was in violation of the ordinance, and permittee's position was substantially unchanged since the construction permittee had undertaken was limited to "four or five men" doing "a half day's work." Id . 280 P. at 472. 62 Bankoff v. Board of Adjustment of Wagoner County , 1994 OK 58, n.9, 875 P.2d 1138, 1143, citing, Burdick v. Independent School , 1985 OK 49, 702 P.2d 48 (If the facts and circumstances implicate a prevailing public interest, the case will exce | 2 | 2017–2017 |
General Motors Corp. v. Oklahoma County Board of Equalization
green
2 sentences2017In McCurley , the Court explained the permit was in violation of an ordinance, the permittee possessed constructive knowledge the permit was in violation of the ordinance, and permittee's position was substantially unchanged since the construction permittee had undertaken was limited to "four or five men" doing "a half day's work." Id . 280 P. at 472 . 62 Bankoff v. Board of Adjustment of Wagoner County , 1994 OK 58, n.9 , 875 P.2d 1138, 1143 , citing, Burdick v. Independent School , 1985 OK 49 , 702 P.2d 48 (If the facts and circumstances implicate a prevailing public interest, the case will 2017In McCurley , the Court explained the permit was in violation of an ordinance, the permittee possessed constructive knowledge the permit was in violation of the ordinance, and permittee's position was substantially unchanged since the construction permittee had undertaken was limited to "four or five men" doing "a half day's work." Id . 280 P. at 472 . 62 Bankoff v. Board of Adjustment of Wagoner County , 1994 OK 58, n.9 , 875 P.2d 1138, 1143 , citing, Burdick v. Independent School , 1985 OK 49 , 702 P.2d 48 (If the facts and circumstances implicate a prevailing public interest, the case will | 2 | 2017–2017 |
Sadler v. Board of Com'rs of Mayes County
neutral
2 sentences1936In unplatted tracts no well shall be drilled or put down upon any block or tract of less than 5 acres in area, and in platted tracts no such well shall be drilled or put down upon any block of less than 2% acres in area, except as otherwise provided. * * *” In the case of Anderson-Kerr, Inc., v. Van Meter, 162 Okla. 176 , 19 P. (2d) 1068 , this court held that there are four requirements which must be met before there is authority to grant a permit as an exception to the terms of the above ordinance. 1934Anderson-Kerr, Inc., v. Van Meter, 162 Okla. 176 , 19 P. (2d) 1068 . | 2 | 1934–1936 |
Anderson-Kerr, Inc. v. Van Meter
neutral
2 sentences1936In unplatted tracts no well shall be drilled or put down upon any block or tract of less than 5 acres in area, and in platted tracts no such well shall be drilled or put down upon any block of less than 2% acres in area, except as otherwise provided. * * *” In the case of Anderson-Kerr, Inc., v. Van Meter, 162 Okla. 176 , 19 P. (2d) 1068 , this court held that there are four requirements which must be met before there is authority to grant a permit as an exception to the terms of the above ordinance. 1934Anderson-Kerr, Inc., v. Van Meter, 162 Okla. 176 , 19 P. (2d) 1068 . | 2 | 1934–1936 |
E. I. Du Pont De Nemours Powder Co. v. Dodson
green
1 sentence1997Du Pont de Nemours Powder Company v. Dodson, 150 P. at 1087 . ¶ 19 However, the Court held that the permit did not bar a suit for damages under Section 23: [W]hilst the Legislature may legalize an act which might otherwise be a nuisance, it cannot authorize the taking or damaging of private property. . . . | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Van Meter v. H. F. Wilcox Oil & Gas Co.
green
2 sentences1936In the case of Van Meter v. Wilcox Oil & Gas Co., 170 Okla. 604 , 41 P. (2d) 904 , this court considered a number of the applicable authorities. 1936In the case of Van Meter v. Wilcox Oil & Gas Co., 170 Okla. 604 , 41 P. (2d) 904 , this court considered a number of the applicable authorities. | 1 | 1936–1936 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.