permit privilege (Arizona) · Go Syfert
← Arizona issues

permit privilege in Arizona

6 Arizona opinions name it 2 courts 1976–2020 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Arizona courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
Ulan v. Vend-A-Coin, Inc.green
arizctapp · 1976 · cited in 2 Arizona opinions naming this issue, 1983–1984
2 sentences

1983“A license is merely a permit or privilege to do what otherwise would be unlawful.” Ulan v. Vend-A-Coin, Inc., 27 Ariz.App. 713, 715 , 558 P.2d 741, 743 (1976).

1983“A license is merely a permit or privilege to do what otherwise would be unlawful.” Ulan v. Vend-A-Coin, Inc., 27 Ariz.App. 713, 715 , 558 P.2d 741, 743 (1976).

12

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Arizona. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (4)

CaseCitedYears
Southern Union Co. v. United States green
scotus · 2012
1 sentence

2020That statute, codified under a heading entitled “criminal penalties,” imposed a criminal fine of $50,000/day for each violation, as well as up to five years in prison. 42 U.S.C. § 6928 (d)(7); 567 U.S. at 347 .

12020–2020
Crowell v. Jejna green
arizctapp · 2007
1 sentence

2008Id. at 540, ¶ 23 , 161 P.3d at 583 . ¶ 9 Appellants concede that there is no common law analog to the City’s charges that appellants engaged in nude dancing without a permit in violation of S.C.C. § 16-247(a).

12008–2008
Maricopa County Health Department v. Harmon green
arizctapp · 1987
2 sentences

1989Maricopa County Health Department v. Harmon, 156 Ariz. 161 , 750 P.2d 1364 (App.1987).

1989Maricopa County Health Department v. Harmon, 156 Ariz. 161 , 750 P.2d 1364 (App.1987).

11989–1989
Radke v. Union Pacific Railroad Company green
colo · 1959
2 sentences

1976Radke v. Union Pacific Railroad Company, 138 Colo. 189 , 334 P.2d 1077 (1959).

1976Radke v. Union Pacific Railroad Company, 138 Colo. 189 , 334 P.2d 1077 (1959).

11976–1976

Where else courts name it

CA 66 (1894–2023) CT 61 (1965–2026) TX 34 (1935–2017) NY 33 (1927–2019) IL 23 (1910–2025) NJ 21 (1956–2026) VT 13 (1998–2026) MA 13 (1945–2021) WA 12 (1985–2023) WI 11 (1963–2016) MI 11 (1957–2026) PA 11 (1941–2021) FL 10 (1938–2021) OR 9 (1929–2025) AR 8 (1951–2012) ND 8 (1977–2019) MN 8 (1979–2016) MD 8 (2001–2026) CO 7 (1972–2025) IN 7 (1926–2019) UT 6 (2013–2018) NH 6 (1952–2012) AZ 6 (1976–2020) NC 6 (1972–2020) IA 6 (1930–2026) ME 5 (2000–2012) OH 5 (1982–2014) OK 5 (1934–2017) HI 4 (2006–2018) MO 4 (1981–2021) LA 4 (1976–2023) SD 4 (2013–2022) TN 3 (1940–2006) DC 3 (1990–2017) NM 3 (1980–2009) GA 3 (1981–2011) KY 3 (1928–2018) WV 3 (1997–2015) SC 3 (1998–2018) VA 3 (1967–2001) AL 3 (1973–1995) NE 2 (1970–2025) WY 2 (1983–1985)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check