Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 Oregon opinions name it 2 courts 1929–2025 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Oregon courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Outdoor Media Dimensions, Inc. v. Department of Transportationgreen2 sentences2025Id. at 301 .4 The Court could have ended the different treat- ment either by: (1) striking from the OMIA the exemp- tion from the permit requirement for on-premises signs or (2) striking the permit requirement itself as it applied to off- premises signs. 2025Id. at 301 .4 The Court could have ended the different treat- ment either by: (1) striking from the OMIA the exemption from the permit requirement for on-premises signs or (2) striking the permit requirement itself as it applied to off- premises signs. | 2 | 4 |
Oregon Occupational Safety & Health Division v. CBI Services, Inc.green2 sentences2017See OR-OSHA v. CBI Services, Inc., 356 Or 577, 585 , 341 P3d 701 (2014) (identifying circumstances justifying deference to an agency’s statutory construction). 2017See OR-OSHA v. CBI Services, Inc., 356 Or 577, 585 , 341 P3d 701 (2014) (identifying circumstances justifying deference to an agency’s statutory construction). | 1 | 1 |
Brower Ex Rel. Estate of Caldwell v. County of Inyogreen2 sentences2001See, e.g., Brower v. Inyo County, 489 US 593, 599 , 109 S Ct 1378 , 103 L Ed 2d 628 (1989) (discussing requirements of proximate causation with respect to section 1983 claims). 2001See, e.g., Brower v. Inyo County, 489 US 593, 599 , 109 S Ct 1378 , 103 L Ed 2d 628 (1989) (discussing requirements of proximate causation with respect to section 1983 claims). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Oregon. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Lake Oswego Preservation Society v. City of Lake Oswego
green
2 sentences2017We generally interpret statutes by “examining] the statutory text in context, along with its legislative history, applying as needed relevant rules and canons of construction.” Lake Oswego Preservation Society v. City of Lake Oswego, 360 Or 115, 124 , 379 P3d 462 (2016). 2017We generally interpret statutes by “examining] the statutory text in context, along with its legislative history, applying as needed relevant rules and canons of construction.” Lake Oswego Preservation Society v. City of Lake Oswego, 360 Or 115, 124 , 379 P3d 462 (2016). | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Bridgeview Vineyards, Inc. v. State Land Board
green
1 sentence2013Finally, the law also contained more stringent permitting requirements for salmonid streams by requiring a permit before any material could be removed from those streams, except for ‘activities customarily associated with agriculture.’” Id. at 261 . | 1 | 2013–2013 |
City of Eugene v. Miller
green
2 sentences2006In that aspect of its case, petitioner relies on Purcell and City of Eugene v. Miller, 318 Or 480 , 871 P2d 454 (1994), both of which involved ordinances that effectively prohibited certain forms of speech. 2006In that aspect of its case, petitioner relies on Purcell and City of Eugene v. Miller, 318 Or 480 , 871 P2d 454 (1994), both of which involved ordinances that effectively prohibited certain forms of speech. | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Van v. Travel Information Council
green
1 sentence1997As discussed *122 above, the OMIA’s permit requirement is not content-based, 22 150 Or App at 117-18, Van, 52 Or App at 408-09 , and the relocation and transfer provisions apply to all billboards, regardless of the content of their messages. | 1 | 1997–1997 |
State v. Haynes
neutral
2 sentences1929The unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor within this state is a statutory offense; and, as heretofore held by this court in State v. Haynes, 116 Or. 635 ( 242 Pac. 603 ), the admission of evidence of the possession of such liquor in a cause wherein such possession constitutes a distinct offense, having no relation to or bearing upon the issues to be determined, will constitute reversible error. * * Treating of the general principles of evidence, our Code provides that collateral questions should be avoided, but that it is within the discretionary power of the court to permit inquiry into 1929The unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor within this state is a statutory offense; and, as heretofore held by this court in State v. Haynes, 116 Or. 635 ( 242 Pac. 603 ), the admission of evidence of the possession of such liquor in a cause wherein such possession constitutes a distinct offense, having no relation to or bearing upon the issues to be determined, will constitute reversible error. * * Treating of the general principles of evidence, our Code provides that collateral questions should be avoided, but that it is within the discretionary power of the court to permit inquiry into | 1 | 1929–1929 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.