11 Pennsylvania opinions name it 4 courts 1941–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Pennsylvania courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Commonwealth v. Austingreen2 sentences1992Id., 500 Pa. at 623 , 459 A.2d at 338 . 1992Id., 500 Pa. at 623 , 459 A.2d at 338. | 2 | 3 |
Shohola Falls Trails End Property Owners Ass'n v. Zoning Hearing Boardgreen1 sentence2021Shohola Falls Trails End Property Owners Association, Inc. v. Zoning Hearing Board, 679 A.2d 1335, 1341 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1996). 16 Appellant has offered no case precedent, nor is this Court aware of existing case precedent, holding that a code enforcement officer’s directive to cure the permit violation is akin to an ordinance that gives rise to the right to seek a validity variance. | 1 | 1 |
James v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authoritygreen1 sentence1992Id., 500 Pa. at 623 , 459 A.2d at 338. | 1 | 1 |
Gossman v. Lower Chanceford Township Board of Supervisorsgreen2 sentences1983See Gossman v. Lower Chanceford Township Board of Supervisors, 62 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 229 , 435 A.2d 684 (1981); Galbreath v. Board of Supervisors of Northampton Township, 55 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 165 , 423 A.2d 45 (1980). 1983See Gossman v. Lower Chanceford Township Board of Supervisors, 62 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 229 , 435 A.2d 684 (1981); Galbreath v. Board of Supervisors of Northampton Township, 55 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 165 , 423 A.2d 45 (1980). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Pennsylvania. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Clark v. Troutman
green
2 sentences1988Therefore, Dithridge points to the case of Clark v. Troutman, 509 Pa. 336 , 502 A.2d 137 (1985), where the Supreme Court considered a situation involving an act passed by the legislature’ raising the salaries of elected officials of some counties, when permitted by the constitution. 1988Therefore, Dithridge points to the case of Clark v. Troutman, 509 Pa. 336 , 502 A.2d 137 (1985), where the Supreme Court considered a situation involving an act passed by the legislature’ raising the salaries of elected officials of some counties, when permitted by the constitution. | 2 | 1988–1988 |
Synagro-WWT, Inc. v. RUSH TP., PENNSYLVANIA
green
1 sentence2009The district court explained that the township had two available remedies: it could inform the Department of any possible SWMA violations so that the Department could inspect the site and take enforcement action pursuant to its regulations, or the township could bring an action in equity for an injunction to restrain violations of the SWMA as provided for in Section 604 of SWMA. 16 Id. at 422 . | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Commonwealth v. Downing
green
2 sentences2002In Commonwealth v. Downing, 511 Pa. 28 , 511 A.2d 792 (1986), defendant sought admission to the Temple University Law Library. 2002In Commonwealth v. Downing, 511 Pa. 28 , 511 A.2d 792 (1986), defendant sought admission to the Temple University Law Library. | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Galbreath v. Board of Supervisors
green
2 sentences1983See Gossman v. Lower Chanceford Township Board of Supervisors, 62 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 229 , 435 A.2d 684 (1981); Galbreath v. Board of Supervisors of Northampton Township, 55 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 165 , 423 A.2d 45 (1980). 1983See Gossman v. Lower Chanceford Township Board of Supervisors, 62 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 229 , 435 A.2d 684 (1981); Galbreath v. Board of Supervisors of Northampton Township, 55 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 165 , 423 A.2d 45 (1980). | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Weinbach's Appeal
green
2 sentences1958The Superior Court is an intermediate Court whose jurisdiction “is limited to matters expressly conferred by statute: "Weinbach’s Appeal, 316 Pa. 333 , 175 A. 500 .” Society Christopher Columbus v. Lombardo, 155 Pa. Superior Ct. 67 , 36 A. 2d 825 . 1958The Superior Court is an intermediate Court whose jurisdiction “is limited to matters expressly conferred by statute: "Weinbach’s Appeal, 316 Pa. 333 , 175 A. 500 .” Society Christopher Columbus v. Lombardo, 155 Pa. Superior Ct. 67 , 36 A. 2d 825 . | 1 | 1958–1958 |
Societa diMutuo Soccorso v. Lombardo
green
2 sentences1958The Superior Court is an intermediate Court whose jurisdiction “is limited to matters expressly conferred by statute: "Weinbach’s Appeal, 316 Pa. 333 , 175 A. 500 .” Society Christopher Columbus v. Lombardo, 155 Pa. Superior Ct. 67 , 36 A. 2d 825 . 1958The Superior Court is an intermediate Court whose jurisdiction “is limited to matters expressly conferred by statute: "Weinbach’s Appeal, 316 Pa. 333 , 175 A. 500 .” Society Christopher Columbus v. Lombardo, 155 Pa. Superior Ct. 67 , 36 A. 2d 825 . | 1 | 1958–1958 |
Puhl v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission
green
2 sentences1941The scope and purpose of the clause has been defined in Puhl et al. v. Pa. P. U. C., 139 Pa. Superior Ct. 152 , 11 A. 2d 508 , as follows: “It was the intent and purpose of the proviso in section 804 to recognize and continue in force service bona fide performed by contract motor carriers on the effective date of the act as a matter of right, without the necessity of establishing that the applicant was fit and able properly to perform such service or showing that the proposed service was in the public interest. 1941The scope and purpose of the clause has been defined in Puhl et al. v. Pa. P. U. C., 139 Pa. Superior Ct. 152 , 11 A. 2d 508 , as follows: “It was the intent and purpose of the proviso in section 804 to recognize and continue in force service bona fide performed by contract motor carriers on the effective date of the act as a matter of right, without the necessity of establishing that the applicant was fit and able properly to perform such service or showing that the proposed service was in the public interest. | 1 | 1941–1941 |
Spackman v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission
neutral
2 sentences1941In asserting the right to a permit under the clause, the burden is on the applicant to establish all facts necessary to invoke its benefits. *248 Spackman v. Pa. P. U. C., 141 Pa. Superior Ct. 164 , 14 A. 2d 839 . 1941In asserting the right to a permit under the clause, the burden is on the applicant to establish all facts necessary to invoke its benefits. *248 Spackman v. Pa. P. U. C., 141 Pa. Superior Ct. 164 , 14 A. 2d 839 . | 1 | 1941–1941 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.