permit requirement (Maryland) · Go Syfert
← Maryland issues

permit requirement in Maryland

8 Maryland opinions name it 2 courts 2001–2026 3 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Maryland courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

CaseFollowedCited
Mahai v. Stategreen
md · 2021 · cited in 1 Maryland opinions naming this issue, 2026–2026
1 sentence

2026See Mahai v. State, 474 Md. 648, 664 (2021); Edgewood Nursing Home v. Maxwell, 282 Md. 422, 427 (1978) (citations omitted).

11
Edgewood Nursing Home v. Maxwellgreen
md · 1978 · cited in 1 Maryland opinions naming this issue, 2026–2026
1 sentence

2026See Mahai v. State, 474 Md. 648, 664 (2021); Edgewood Nursing Home v. Maxwell, 282 Md. 422, 427 (1978) (citations omitted).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Maryland. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (5)

CaseCitedYears
Dept. of Env. v. Carroll Cnty. Frederick Cnty. v. Dept. of Env. green
md · 2019
2 sentences

2023We also pointed out that, in Carroll County, 465 Md. at 188 - 89, 214 A.3d at 73, we had “observed that a[ municipal separate storm sewer system] permit is not a typical [National Pollution Discharge Elimination System] permit; [municipal separate storm sewer systems] differ from ‘end-of-pipe’ point sources and have a different permit standard.” Md.

2021Carroll County, 465 Md. at 243-44 .4 Phase II extended the permit requirement to “small” MS4s, such as those operated by the County, which serve fewer than 100,000 people.

22021–2023
cluster 352415 green
cadc · 1977
2 sentences

2019That exemption was challenged and held invalid in Natural Resources Defense Council v. Costle, 568 F.2d 1369 , 1372-73 (D.C.

2019That exemption was challenged and held invalid in Natural Resources Defense Council v. Costle, 568 F.2d 1369 , 1372-73 (D.C.

22019–2019
Reed v. Town of Gilbert green
scotus · 2015
2 sentences

2020Reed, supra, 135 S. Ct. at 2227 .

2020Reed, supra, 135 S. Ct. at 2227 .

12020–2020
Kor-Ko Ltd. v. Maryland Department of the Environment green
md · 2017
2 sentences

2018This loading rate for phosphorus is expressed as an enforceable "limit" rather than a goal in MDE's tentative determination. 7 EN § 1-604(b) describes the procedure MDE is required to follow after the close of the public comment period: (b) (1) [MDE] shall prepare a final determination if: (i) Written comments adverse to the tentative determination were received by [MDE] within 30 days after the publication of the notice of tentative determination pursuant to this section; (ii) Comments adverse to the tentative determination were received in writing at, or within 5 days after, the public heari

2018This loading rate for phosphorus is expressed as an enforceable "limit" rather than a goal in MDE's tentative determination. 7 EN § 1-604(b) describes the procedure MDE is required to follow after the close of the public comment period: (b) (1) [MDE] shall prepare a final determination if: (i) Written comments adverse to the tentative determination were received by [MDE] within 30 days after the publication of the notice of tentative determination pursuant to this section; (ii) Comments adverse to the tentative determination were received in writing at, or within 5 days after, the public heari

12018–2018
Howard County v. Carroll green
mdctspecapp · 1987
2 sentences

2001Appellants rely on Howard County v. Carroll, 71 Md.App. 635 , 526 A.2d 996 (1987), to support their argument that the subjective motivation of an owner excepts him from the permitting requirements.

2001Appellants rely on Howard County v. Carroll, 71 Md.App. 635 , 526 A.2d 996 (1987), to support their argument that the subjective motivation of an owner excepts him from the permitting requirements.

12001–2001

Statutes the citing opinions construe

CFR § 40c.f.r.122.44 (5) CFR § 40c.f.r.130.2 (5) USC § 33u.s.c.1251 (5) USC § 33u.s.c.1311 (5) USC § 33u.s.c.1313 (5) USC § 33u.s.c.1342 (5) USC § 33u.s.c.1362 (5) CFR § 40c.f.r.122.26 (3) CFR § 40c.f.r.123.44 (3) CFR § 40c.f.r.125.3 (3) CFR § 40c.f.r.130.3 (3) USC § 33u.s.c.1319 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

CA 66 (1894–2023) CT 61 (1965–2026) TX 34 (1935–2017) NY 33 (1927–2019) IL 23 (1910–2025) NJ 21 (1956–2026) VT 13 (1998–2026) MA 13 (1945–2021) WA 12 (1985–2023) WI 11 (1963–2016) MI 11 (1957–2026) PA 11 (1941–2021) FL 10 (1938–2021) OR 9 (1929–2025) AR 8 (1951–2012) ND 8 (1977–2019) MN 8 (1979–2016) MD 8 (2001–2026) CO 7 (1972–2025) IN 7 (1926–2019) UT 6 (2013–2018) NH 6 (1952–2012) AZ 6 (1976–2020) NC 6 (1972–2020) IA 6 (1930–2026) ME 5 (2000–2012) OH 5 (1982–2014) OK 5 (1934–2017) HI 4 (2006–2018) MO 4 (1981–2021) LA 4 (1976–2023) SD 4 (2013–2022) TN 3 (1940–2006) DC 3 (1990–2017) NM 3 (1980–2009) GA 3 (1981–2011) KY 3 (1928–2018) WV 3 (1997–2015) SC 3 (1998–2018) VA 3 (1967–2001) AL 3 (1973–1995) NE 2 (1970–2025) WY 2 (1983–1985)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check