Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Oregon opinions name it 2 courts 1987–2012 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Oregon courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
United States v. Urquidezgreen2 sentences1987We quoted the following passage from United States v. Urquidez, 356 F Supp 1363, 1367 (DC CD Cal 1973), with approval: “* * * [Although the inquiry was far from complete, the experience of this case has amply shown that, as of now, the validity of a polygraphic test is dependent upon a large number of variable factors, many of which would be very difficult, and perhaps impossible, to assess. 1987We quoted the following passage from United States v. Urquidez, 356 F. Supp. 1363, 1367 (D.C.C.D.Cal. 1973), with approval: "* * * [A]lthough the inquiry was far from complete, the experience of this case has amply shown that, as of now, the validity of a polygraphic test is dependent upon a large number of variable factors, many of which would be very difficult, and perhaps impossible, to assess. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Oregon. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Hoxie v. Department of Revenue
green
2 sentences2012“Obviously a myriad of factors can affect the RMV of property * * * The exception value is limited to the RMV attributable to the new improvements.” Id. 2010The court went on to state that "a myriad of factors can affect the RMV of property." Id. | 2 | 2010–2012 |
California v. Ramos
green
2 sentences2003However, subject to that constitutional limitation, the Court has stated that, under the Eighth Amendment, a jury is “free to consider a myriad of factors to determine whether death is the appropriate punishment.” California v. Ramos, 463 US 992, 1008 , 103 S Ct 3446 , 77 L Ed 2d 1171 (1983). 2003However, subject to that constitutional limitation, the Court has stated that, under the Eighth Amendment, a jury is “free to consider a myriad of factors to determine whether death is the appropriate punishment.” California v. Ramos, 463 US 992, 1008 , 103 S Ct 3446 , 77 L Ed 2d 1171 (1983). | 2 | 2002–2003 |
Zant v. Stephens
green
1 sentence2002In that case, the Court found no constitutional infirmity when a Georgia court instructed the jury in the selection phase to consider “all facts and circumstances presented in extenuation, mitigation, and aggravation of punishment as well as such arguments as have been presented for the State and for the Defense.” Zant, 462 US at 878-80 , 889 n 25. *284 Applying those standards, we cannot say that ORS 163.150(1) and its related jury instruction violate the Eighth or Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution. | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.