myriad factors (Connecticut) · Go Syfert
← Connecticut issues

myriad factors in Connecticut

6 Connecticut opinions name it 3 courts 1995–2025 1 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Connecticut courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (3)

CaseFollowedCited
State v. Danielsgreen
conn · 1988 · cited in 3 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 1998–2025
2 sentences

2025This difficult and delicate process neces- sarily involves a careful consideration by the court of such factors as the strength of the state’s case, the likelihood of conviction, the severity of the crime, its effect on the victim, the strength of the defendant’s defense, the defendant’s personal situation, and all the other myriad factors that underlie a judgment regarding fundamental fairness.’’ (Citation omitted.) State v. Dills, 19 Conn. App. 495 , 503–504, 563 A.2d 733 (1989); see also State v. Daniels, 209 Conn. 225, 238 , 550 A.2d 885 (1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1069 , 109 S. Ct. 134

2025This difficult and delicate process neces- sarily involves a careful consideration by the court of such factors as the strength of the state’s case, the likelihood of conviction, the severity of the crime, its effect on the victim, the strength of the defendant’s defense, the defendant’s personal situation, and all the other myriad factors that underlie a judgment regarding fundamental fairness.’’ (Citation omitted.) State v. Dills, 19 Conn. App. 495 , 503–504, 563 A.2d 733 (1989); see also State v. Daniels, 209 Conn. 225, 238 , 550 A.2d 885 (1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1069 , 109 S. Ct. 134

33
Redwine v. Georgiagreen
scotus · 1989 · cited in 3 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 1998–2025
2 sentences

2025This difficult and delicate process neces- sarily involves a careful consideration by the court of such factors as the strength of the state’s case, the likelihood of conviction, the severity of the crime, its effect on the victim, the strength of the defendant’s defense, the defendant’s personal situation, and all the other myriad factors that underlie a judgment regarding fundamental fairness.’’ (Citation omitted.) State v. Dills, 19 Conn. App. 495 , 503–504, 563 A.2d 733 (1989); see also State v. Daniels, 209 Conn. 225, 238 , 550 A.2d 885 (1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1069 , 109 S. Ct. 134

1998This difficult and delicate process necessarily involves a careful consideration by the court of such factors as the strength of the state’s case, the likelihood of conviction, the severity of the crime, its effect on the victim, the strength of the defendant’s defense, the defendant’s personal situation, and all the other myriad factors that underlie a judgment regarding fundamental fairness.” State v. Dills, supra, 19 Conn. App. 503 -504; see State v. Daniels, 209 Conn. 225, 238 , 550 A.2d 885 (1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1069 , 109 S. Ct. 1349 , 103 L.

33
Hicks v. Fairgreen
scotus · 1989 · cited in 3 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 1998–2025
2 sentences

2025This difficult and delicate process neces- sarily involves a careful consideration by the court of such factors as the strength of the state’s case, the likelihood of conviction, the severity of the crime, its effect on the victim, the strength of the defendant’s defense, the defendant’s personal situation, and all the other myriad factors that underlie a judgment regarding fundamental fairness.’’ (Citation omitted.) State v. Dills, 19 Conn. App. 495 , 503–504, 563 A.2d 733 (1989); see also State v. Daniels, 209 Conn. 225, 238 , 550 A.2d 885 (1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1069 , 109 S. Ct. 134

1998This difficult and delicate process necessarily involves a careful consideration by the court of such factors as the strength of the state’s case, the likelihood of conviction, the severity of the crime, its effect on the victim, the strength of the defendant’s defense, the defendant’s personal situation, and all the other myriad factors that underlie a judgment regarding fundamental fairness.” State v. Dills, supra, 19 Conn. App. 503 -504; see State v. Daniels, 209 Conn. 225, 238 , 550 A.2d 885 (1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1069 , 109 S. Ct. 1349 , 103 L.

33

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (2)

CaseCitedYears
State v. Dills green
connappct · 1989
2 sentences

2025This difficult and delicate process neces- sarily involves a careful consideration by the court of such factors as the strength of the state’s case, the likelihood of conviction, the severity of the crime, its effect on the victim, the strength of the defendant’s defense, the defendant’s personal situation, and all the other myriad factors that underlie a judgment regarding fundamental fairness.’’ (Citation omitted.) State v. Dills, 19 Conn. App. 495 , 503–504, 563 A.2d 733 (1989); see also State v. Daniels, 209 Conn. 225, 238 , 550 A.2d 885 (1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1069 , 109 S. Ct. 134

2025This difficult and delicate process neces- sarily involves a careful consideration by the court of such factors as the strength of the state’s case, the likelihood of conviction, the severity of the crime, its effect on the victim, the strength of the defendant’s defense, the defendant’s personal situation, and all the other myriad factors that underlie a judgment regarding fundamental fairness.’’ (Citation omitted.) State v. Dills, 19 Conn. App. 495 , 503–504, 563 A.2d 733 (1989); see also State v. Daniels, 209 Conn. 225, 238 , 550 A.2d 885 (1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1069 , 109 S. Ct. 134

31995–2025
Doe v. State green
conn · 1990
2 sentences

2005We must respect the legislative prerogative of choosing the special circumstances under which such [tax credits] may be made.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Doe v. State, 216 Conn. 85, 111 , 579 A.2d 37 (1990).

2005We must respect the legislative prerogative of choosing the special circumstances under which such [tax credits] may be made.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Doe v. State, 216 Conn. 85, 111 , 579 A.2d 37 (1990).

12005–2005

Statutes the citing opinions construe

CT § Conn. Gen. Stat. § 54-56 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

IL 39 (1977–2023) TX 32 (1960–2026) CA 31 (1981–2023) NY 28 (1980–2024) AL 25 (2002–2025) PA 23 (1959–2025) OH 19 (1995–2025) NJ 15 (1987–2026) IN 14 (1970–2024) MO 11 (1967–2024) WV 9 (1995–2022) TN 8 (1994–2011) MD 7 (1971–2004) VA 7 (1990–2014) FL 7 (1986–2019) CT 6 (1995–2025) IA 6 (2008–2025) ID 5 (1978–2018) OR 5 (1987–2012) UT 4 (1983–2019) NM 4 (2013–2019) RI 4 (1985–2003) GA 4 (1997–2021) WA 4 (1984–2012) NC 3 (1979–2024) MA 3 (2003–2020) WY 3 (1986–2006) MN 3 (1986–2023) MT 2 (1985–1990) NE 2 (1981–2018) CO 2 (1988–1999) AK 2 (1982–1982) NV 2 (1985–1993) SC 2 (2017–2022) AZ 2 (2006–2025) DE 2 (2016–2017)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check