5 Tennessee opinions name it 2 courts 2000–2024 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Tennessee courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Blackgreen2 sentences2014The trial court may, as a sanction, exclude the testimony of a witness who hears other testimony while subject to a sequestration order.” State v. Black, 75 S.W.3d 422, 424 (Tenn. Crim. 2009Instead, courts retain the discretion to impose a variety of sanctions appropriate to the circumstances.” State v. Black, 75 S.W.3d 422, 424 (Tenn. Crim. | 2 | 2 |
Sneed v. Board of Professional Responsibilitygreen1 sentence2019Id. (citing Garland v. Bd. of Prof’l Responsibility, 536 S.W.3d 811 , 816 (Tenn. 2017); Sneed v. Bd. of Prof’l Responsibility, 301 S.W.3d 603, 612 (Tenn. 2010)). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Anthonygreen1 sentence2000Although the rule does not provide for a sanction for its violation, prior to passage of the rule,“[t]rial judges had always been afforded wide discretion in determining whether to impose the sanction of excluding the evidence of a witness suspected of having violated the rule.” State v. Anthony, 836 S.W.2d 600, 605 (Tenn. Crim. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Tennessee. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Board of Professional Responsibility of The Supreme Court of Tennessee v. Loring Edwin Justice
green
1 sentence2024“Attorneys charged with disciplinary violations have a right to an evidentiary hearing before a hearing panel, which determines whether a violation has occurred and, if so, the appropriate sanction for the violation.” Justice, 577 S.W.3d at 923 . | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Parrish v. Bd. of Prof'l Responsibility
neutral
1 sentence2019Id. (citing Garland v. Bd. of Prof’l Responsibility, 536 S.W.3d 811 , 816 (Tenn. 2017); Sneed v. Bd. of Prof’l Responsibility, 301 S.W.3d 603, 612 (Tenn. 2010)). | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.