Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Kentucky opinions name it 2 courts 2009–2025 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Kentucky courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Greathouse v. American National Bank & Trust Co.green2 sentences2023Greathouse v. American National Bank and Trust Co., 796 S.W.2d 868 (Ky. App. 1990). 2009Greathouse v. *662 American National Bank and Trust Co., 796 S.W.2d 868, 870 (Ky.App.1990). | 1 | 2 |
Kentucky Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. v. Conleygreen1 sentence2025See, e.g., Kentucky Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company v. Conley, 456 S.W.3d 814, 818 (Ky. 2015) (noting that “the appropriate sanction for the violation of a rule is not automatic dismissal; rather, the penalty must be commensurate with the harm caused and the severity of the defect, as determined on a case-by-case basis”). | 1 | 1 |
Jones v. Commonwealthgreen1 sentence2025Jones v. Commonwealth, 237 S.W.3d 153, 157 (Ky. 2007). | 1 | 1 |
KENTUCKY BAR ASS'N v. Harrisgreen1 sentence2012See Kentucky Bar Association v. Pat Harris, 269 S.W.3d 414 (Ky.2008) (An attorney was sanctioned with a public reprimand, after adjudication by an administrative agency, for violating Kentucky state employment policies.). | 1 | 1 |
Comley v. Commonwealthgreen1 sentence2012See Kentucky Bar Ass’n v. Burroughs, 578 S.W.2d 39 (Ky.1979) (The Supreme Court adopted the decision of the Board of Governors that commingling funds with those of a client constitutes unethical and unprofessional conduct and warrants public reprimand); Hines v. Kentucky Bar Ass’n, 122 S.W.3d 66 (Ky.2003) (Attorney’s acquiring an interest in his client’s real estate, and thereby commingling the client’s property with his own property, warranted public reprimand). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Kentucky. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Ready v. Jamison
green
1 sentence2015Id. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Hines v. Kentucky Bar Ass'n
neutral
1 sentence2012See Kentucky Bar Ass’n v. Burroughs, 578 S.W.2d 39 (Ky.1979) (The Supreme Court adopted the decision of the Board of Governors that commingling funds with those of a client constitutes unethical and unprofessional conduct and warrants public reprimand); Hines v. Kentucky Bar Ass’n, 122 S.W.3d 66 (Ky.2003) (Attorney’s acquiring an interest in his client’s real estate, and thereby commingling the client’s property with his own property, warranted public reprimand). | 1 | 2012–2012 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.